THE REINCARNATION ACCORDING TO ALICE BAILEY



Alice Bailey wants to make her followers believe that the Masters of Shamballa know very little about reincarnation and that they are totally ignorant about how reincarnation works.

And this why Alice Bailey in her book "The Reappearance of the Christ", she claims that Djwal Khul stated the following asseveration:

« The teaching (hitherto given out on reincarnation) has done more harm than good. Only one factor remains of value: the existence of a Law of Rebirth is now discussed by many and accepted by thousands.

Beyond the fact that there is such a law, we [the Masters] know little and those who know from experience the factual nature of this return reject earnestly the foolish and improbable details, given out as fact by the theosophical and occult organizations.

The Law exists; but the details of its working, we [the Masters] know as yet nothing. Only a few things can be said with accuracy about it and these few warrant no contradiction. »
(Chapter five: “The teachings of the Christ”, p.117-118)

But this statement by Alice Bailey is false because when you study The Original Theosophy (which is the true esoteric teaching transmitted by the Masters) you realize that the Masters know enormously about reincarnation. And in the blog I will go detailing the extraordinary teaching they gave us about the reincarnation.

_ _ _

Once again Alice Bailey says things about Masters that the facts show that they are false.




THE PLANES OF THE UNIVERSE ACCORDING TO ALICE BAILEY



In her book “A Treatise on the Cosmic Fire” (1925) Alice Bailey puts the following diagram and she affirms that these are:

"The Seven Planes of our Solar System"


(This diagram is found on pages 117 and 961.)

And on the left side of the diagram, Alice Bailey pointed out that these seven planes of the Solar System constituted “the Cosmic Physical Plane”.

The detail is that this statement is FALSE since Blavatsky taught to her personal group of pupils in the meeting that she had with them on November 26, 1890, the true structure taught by the Trans-Himalayan Masters through the following diagrams:


(All the class Blavatsky gave, it can be seen online here)

And since it is difficult to understand these graphs for those who have not studied Theosophy in depth, I will give you a simpler interpretation below.



And as you can see, the structure taught by Blavatsky is very different of the structure taught by Alice Bailey, besides that the seven planes of existence where humans unfold:


They make up only the densest plane of the seven HUGE planes of existence that constitute the Solar System.


And these seven HUGE planes of existence that constitute the Solar System, they make up in turn the densest plane of the seven IMMENSE planes of existence that constitute the Universe.



So, why did Alice Bailey publish that falsehood?

Because she based on what Leadbeater and Annie Besant wrote, not realizing that what they taught was wrong. And the structure taught by Leadbeater, Annie Besant and Alice Bailey, is catastrophic for those students who want to acquire true esoteric knowledge, for the reasons I explain here.




THE PLANES OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ALICE BAILEY


In her book “A Treatise on the Cosmic Fire” (1925) Alice Bailey puts the following diagram and she affirms that these are:

"The Seven Planes of our Solar System"


(This diagram is found on pages 117 and 961.)

The detail is that this statement is FALSE since Blavatsky taught to her personal group of pupils in the meeting that she had with them on November 26, 1890, the true structure taught by the Trans-Himalayan Masters through the following diagram:


(All the class Blavatsky gave, it can be seen online here)

And since it is difficult to understand these graphs for those who have not studied Theosophy in depth, I will give you a simpler interpretation below.


And as you can see, the structure taught by Blavatsky is very different of the structure taught by Alice Bailey, besides that the seven planes of existence where humans unfold:


They make up only the densest plane of the seven HUGE planes of existence that constitute the Solar System.


So, why did Alice Bailey publish that falsehood?

Because she based on what Leadbeater and Annie Besant wrote, not realizing that what they taught was wrong. And the structure taught by Leadbeater, Annie Besant and Alice Bailey, is catastrophic for those students who want to acquire true esoteric knowledge, for the reasons I explain here.




THE SUBTLE PLANES ACCORDING TO ALICE BAILEY




In her book “A Treatise on the Cosmic Fire” (1925) Alice Bailey puts the following diagram and she affirms that this is the esoteric structure of our solar system:


(This diagram is found on pages 117 and 961.)

But unfortunately this diagram is FALSE since the true esoteric structure of the seven planes of existence, teaching by the Masters ant their real disciples, is the following:


And these seven planes are grouped into three parts:


A) The three higher planes constitute the divine world. (Although it would be more accurate to say: the part of the divine world that humans can now access, since there are still higher levels of existence, but to be able to access them, one must already be a very advanced initiate).

B) The three lower planes constitute the terrestrial world, of which only the physical plane is perceptible to the physical senses. But there is also a subtle counterpart that is the astral plane, which serves to give shape to matter. And there is also another subtle counterpart that is the etheric plane, which serves to vitalize that matter. (Because if the etheric plane did not exist, the matter would remain dead, and if the astral plane did not exist, the matter would dissolve, becoming again energy).

C) And to connect these two worlds there is an intermediate plane that serves as a bridge between the divine world and the terrestrial world.


And as you can see, the structure taught by Original Theosophy is very different from what Alice Bailey teaches.


So, why did Alice Bailey publish that incorrect structure?

He did it because she based on what Leadbeater and Annie Besant taught, without realizing that what they taught was wrong. And for proof of this, I refer to what Leadbeater wrote in chapter five of his book “A textbook of Theosophy” (1912):

« Mrs. Besant, President of the Theosophical Society, has decided to take new names to name the planes. So in the future this new nomenclature will be used to replace the old names that were given in volume II of my book “The Inner Life”.

Below is a table for reference.


 NEW NAMES
 OLD NAMES
1
Divine World
Adi plane
2
Monadic World
Plano Aupapaduka
3
Spiritual World
Atomic or Nirvanic Plane
4
Intuitional World
Buddhic Plane
5
Mental World
Mental Plane
6
Emotional or Astral World
Astral plane
7
Physical World
Physical Plane
»

And as you can see, they are exactly the same names and the same structure that Alice Bailey used for her diagram.





OBSERVATION

However, despite the strong evidence that Leadbeater, Besant and Alice Bailey wrote incorrect things, several of their followers have claimed me that the matter is not for as much and that they do not see why I make "a whole scandal", since there is not much difference between the two structures.

But those who think like this is because they have NOT studied esotericism seriously, because if they had really investigated more deeply, than they would be as outraged as I am, and to prove them, consider the following analogy:

Imagine that Leadbeater in his arrogance decides that the notes of the musical range are incorrect and that therefore he must modify them.

And then he decides to join the “C with the “D, and also the “E with the “F. And as he eliminated two notes, to continue having seven notes, he invents two new notes (and which we suppose he calls them: “J” and “K).

So instead of having:

C – D – E – F – G – A – B

Now we have:

CD – EF – G – A – B – J – K

And the one who does not know much about music is going to say:

              "I do not see much difference, since there are also seven notes and sound similar, so it can be considered that it is more or less the same."

But instead he who knows music will say:

              "But what circus did that guy! How they want me to touch such a jumble of inventions and deformations! This cannot be applied in any real musical score!"

And the same happens to the deformations that Leadbeater invented with esotericism!

Because having gathered the physical plane with the energetic plane.
And to have joined the astral plane with the kamasic plane.
And to have invented the divine plane and the monadic plane.

Leadbeater completely altered the structure taught by the Trans-Himâlayan Masters and this structure IS THE BASE on which everything that exists in the Universe is organized, because of the Correspondence Law that says:

"As is above, is below, as is in the small, is in the great."

And consequently that septenary structure taught by the Masters will also be reflected in all the other aspects of Creation.

For example:

In the macrocosmic scales of the Universe



In the hidden constitution of the humans



In the cosmic evolution that humans make through the seven rounds, since it is in each of these rounds that one of these seven principles is perfected.



And also in the evolution that humans make within each of these rounds through the seven root races.



And these correspondences also you find them:

-      on the sacred planets,
-      in the rays of creation,
-      in the chakras,
-      in the colors,
-      in the musical notes,
-      and even in the hidden structure of the different kingdoms of nature (the mineral kingdom, the plant kingdom, the animal kingdom, etc.)

THIS CORRESPONDENCE IS FOUND EVERYWHERE

And when they alter the basic structure, these correspondences disappear (what happens with the various esoteric pseudo-teachings that have emerged). And that's why while you keep reading only the books of Leadbeater, Besant or Alice Bailey, the structures they teach will seem very consistent.

But the day you want to apply those structures with what the Masters of Shamballa really taught, you will crash because simply those alterations are irreconcilable with the true esoteric teaching.

So it is up to you to decide if you want to keep wasting your time studying false things or if you really want to acquire true esoteric knowledge.




THE SACRED PLANETS ACCORDING TO ALICE BAILEY




Theosophy explains that at an esoteric level, not all planets are equal, since there are planets that are more important than others, and these planets that have a particular relevance in the energetic structure of the solar system are called in the occultism:

“The Sacred Planets”

And as Alice Bailey pretended to be a great esotericist, she gave the following classification of the planets of our solar system:

Sacred planets

Vulcan
Mercury
Venus
Jupiter
Saturn
Neptune
Uranus


Non-sacred planets

Earth
Mars
Pluto
Moon
Sun


(This is found in her book “Esoteric Psychology”, volume I, part two, chapter III, section 2 entitled: “The Ray of Planet Earth”, p.335, the first edition was printed in 1936)


BUT THE DETAIL IS THAT THIS CLASSIFICATION IS ERRONEOUS!!!


Because the Masters and Blavatsky in the book “The Secret Doctrine” they pointed out that:

« The sacred planets are: Mercury, Mars, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, the Sun and the Moon. »

(Volume I, p.575, 1888)

We see that the sacred planets correspond to the planets used by ancient astrology. Which has much logic, since astrology (and despite all the alterations that have been made) is a very deep hermetic science and that is why the ancient astrologers knew the importance of these planets.


And contrary to what modern skeptics claim, the ancient sages knew that the sun and the moon were NOT planets. However, they used them in their classification for hidden reasons, as Blavatsky points out:

« This classification is accepted only for astrological purposes. While the true classification (which is kept in secret) differs from this, since the Sun, being the central star (and not a planet) has an even deeper and more mysterious relationship with our Earth chain than is generally known.

Neither the Earth, nor its satellite, the Moon, nor even the stars, for another reason, were more than substitutes used for esoteric purposes. »
(Secret Doctrine I, p.575)

The Sun and the Moon were used to represent two sacred planets that are still unknown today.


Why did Alice Bailey give that wrong classification?


Because she based on Leadbeater's erroneous teachings. And if you see the following table, you will realize that they are the same planets that Alice Bailey designated as sacred planets, only the planet Earth changed for Mercury.


TABLE
ALICE BAILEY

Vulcan
Venus
Earth
Jupiter
Saturn
Uranus
Neptune


Vulcan
Venus
Mercury
Jupiter
Saturn
Uranus
Neptune



This table was elaborated by the researcher Arthur Powell and published in his book “The Solar System” in 1930 (six years before Alice Bailey published her book “Esoteric Psychology”). And this table was elaborated in based on what Leadbeater had written in his book “A Textbook of Theosophy” (1912).

But the detail is that this structure is completely false and was invented by Leadbeater for the reasons that I explain here. (Later I will put this article)




CONCLUSION

If Alice Bailey had been the messenger of the Masters as she pretended to be, then she would have mentioned the same sacred planets that appear in the Secret Doctrine, but we see that in reality she read the Arthur Powell’s book to elaborate her supposed esoteric classification, and to top it off, she did not even realize that what Leadbeater taught was false !!!