THE REINCARNATION ACCORDING TO ALICE BAILEY

Alice Bailey wants to make her followers believe that the Masters of Shamballa know very little about reincarnation and that they are totally ignorant about how reincarnation works.

And this why Alice Bailey in her book "The Reappearance of the Christ", she claims that Djwal Khul stated the following asseveration:

« The teaching (hitherto given out on reincarnation) has done more harm than good. Only one factor remains of value: the existence of a Law of Rebirth is now discussed by many and accepted by thousands.

Beyond the fact that there is such a law, we [the Masters] know little and those who know from experience the factual nature of this return reject earnestly the foolish and improbable details, given out as fact by the theosophical and occult organizations.

The Law exists; but the details of its working, we [the Masters] know as yet nothing. Only a few things can be said with accuracy about it and these few warrant no contradiction. »

(Chapter five: “The teachings of the Christ”, p.117-118)

But this statement by Alice Bailey is false because when you study The Original Theosophy (which is the true esoteric teaching transmitted by the Masters) you realize that the Masters know enormously about reincarnation. And in the blog I will go detailing the extraordinary teaching they gave us about the reincarnation.

For example, in this other article, I have compiled the information Master Kuthumi gave about reincarnation, and if you read it, you will be able to verify that he has a very deep knowledge on that subject (see link).

But also what Alice Bailey says often is opposite what Master Kuthumi taught, for example:

1) Alice Bailey stated:

« Some Egos cycle through their incarnations and their pralayas very rapidly; others spend untold aeons, and hence it is impossible to say that there are even "averages" connected with the appearance of Egos on the physical plane. »

(A Treatise on Cosmic Fire, p.1036)

This is false because the masters and their disciples did reveal that average.

2) And also Alice Bailey assured that:

« The periods in which the spiritual man is out of incarnation and has withdrawn into egoic consciousness. They practically do not exist for the one who is little evolved, since they pass cyclically and with amazing speed inside and outside the incarnation

Life interludes, or those periods where in the spiritual man is out of incarnation, and has withdrawn into the egoic consciousness. These, for the little evolved, are practically non-existent; they cycle in and out of incarnation with amazing rapidity. »

(A Treatise on White Magic, p.513)

This is also false because Master Kuthumi pointed out that on average the duration to reincarnate is 1200 to 1500 years.

3) And also Alice Bailey stated that:

« Basically, it is not desire which prompts return but will and knowledge of the plan. »

(Esoteric Astrology, p.324)

This is also false because Master Kuthumi pointed out that one of the main factors that drives souls to want to reincarnate is the strength of Tanha (which in Sanskrit means the desire to have earthly experiences).

4) And also Alice Bailey assured that:

« It is not the need for achieving an ultimate perfection which goads the ego on to experience in form, for the ego is already perfect. »

(Esoteric Astrology, p.324)

This is incorrect because Master Kuthumi explained that humans at the beginning of their evolution are like “cosmic seeds,” that is, they already contain in them the full potential to become divine beings, but there is still nothing built into them, and that is why humans have to reincarnate, in order to carry out that development.

5) And also Alice Bailey wrote that:

« An instance of this inaccurate and foolish attempt to throw light upon the theory of rebirth, can be seen in the time limits imposed upon departed human souls, between incarnation on the physical plane, and the return to physical rebirth - so many years of absence are proclaimed, dependent upon the age of the departed soul, and its place upon the ladder of evolution.

If, we are told, the soul is very advanced, absence from the physical plane is prolonged, whereas the reverse is the case. Advanced souls, and those whose intellectual capacity is rapidly developing, come back with great rapidity, owing to their sensitive response to the pull and obligations, interests and responsibilities already established upon the physical plane. »

(Esoteric Healing, p.403)

This is also false because Master Kuthumi pointed out that more your life on Earth has been enriching in knowledge, experiences, development, spirituality and positive karma. More time you will remain in the divine world before reincarnating again. And only in exceptional cases the humans quickly reincarnate.

~ * ~

And this shows that Alice Bailey was very ignorant of how reincarnation works, but it also shows that Alice Bailey was not a Master Kuthumi's disciple as she intended, because if she had truly been her disciple, then she would have taught same teachings and not the lies she put in her books.

THE PLANES OF THE UNIVERSE ACCORDING TO ALICE BAILEY

In her book “A Treatise on the Cosmic Fire” (1925) Alice Bailey puts the following diagram and she affirms that these are:

"The Seven Planes of our Solar System"

(This diagram is found on pages 117 and 961.)

And on the left side of this diagram, Alice Bailey pointed out that these seven planes of the Solar System constituted “the Cosmic Physical Plane”.

But the detail is that this statement is FALSE since Blavatsky taught to her personal group of pupils in the meeting that she had with them on November 26, 1890, the true structure taught by the Transhimalayan Masters through the following diagrams:

(All the class Blavatsky gave, it can be seen online here)

And since it is difficult to understand these graphs for those who have not studied Theosophy in depth, I will give you a simpler interpretation below.

And as you can see, the structure taught by Blavatsky is very different of the structure taught by Alice Bailey, besides that the seven planes of existence where humans unfold:

They make up only the densest plane of the seven HUGE planes of existence that constitute the Solar System.

And these seven HUGE planes of existence that constitute the Solar System, they make up in turn the densest plane of the seven IMMENSE planes of existence that constitute the Universe.

So, why did Alice Bailey publish that falsehood?

Because she based on what Leadbeater and Annie Besant wrote, not realizing that what they taught was wrong. And the structure taught by Leadbeater, Annie Besant and Alice Bailey, is catastrophic for the students who want to acquire the true esoteric knowledge, for the reasons I explain here.

THE PLANES OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ALICE BAILEY

In her book “A Treatise on the Cosmic Fire” (1925) Alice Bailey puts the following diagram and she affirms that these are:

"The Seven Planes of our Solar System"

(This diagram is found on pages 117 and 961.)

The detail is that this statement is FALSE since Blavatsky taught to her personal group of pupils in the meeting that she had with them on November 26, 1890, the true structure taught by the Trans-Himalayan Masters through the following diagram:

(All the class Blavatsky gave, it can be seen online here)

And since it is difficult to understand these graphs for those who have not studied Theosophy in depth, I will give you a simpler interpretation below.

And as you can see, the structure taught by Blavatsky is very different of the structure taught by Alice Bailey, besides that the seven planes of existence where humans unfold:

They make up only the densest plane of the seven HUGE planes of existence that constitute the Solar System.

So, why did Alice Bailey publish that falsehood?

Because she based on what Leadbeater and Annie Besant wrote, not realizing that what they taught was wrong. And the structure taught by Leadbeater, Annie Besant and Alice Bailey, is catastrophic for those students who want to acquire true esoteric knowledge, for the reasons I explain here.

THE SUBTLE PLANES ACCORDING TO ALICE BAILEY

In her book “A Treatise on the Cosmic Fire” (1925) Alice Bailey puts the following diagram and she affirms that this is the esoteric structure of our solar system:

(This diagram is found on pages 117 and 961.)

But unfortunately this diagram is FALSE since the true esoteric structure of the seven planes of existence, teaching by the Masters ant their real disciples, is the following:

And these seven planes are grouped into three parts:

A) The three higher planes constitute the divine world. (Although it would be more accurate to say: the part of the divine world that humans can now access, since there are still higher levels of existence, but to be able to access them, one must already be a very advanced initiate).

B) The three lower planes constitute the terrestrial world, of which only the physical plane is perceptible to the physical senses. But there is also a subtle counterpart that is the astral plane, which serves to give shape to matter. And there is also another subtle counterpart that is the energetic plane, which serves to vitalize that matter. (Because if the energetic plane did not exist, the matter would remain dead, and if the astral plane did not exist, the matter would dissolve, becoming again energy).

C) And to connect these two worlds there is an intermediate plane that serves as a bridge between the divine world and the terrestrial world.

And as you can see, the structure taught by Original Theosophy is very different from what Alice Bailey teaches.

So, why did Alice Bailey publish that incorrect structure?

She did it because she based on what Leadbeater and Annie Besant taught, without realizing that what they taught was wrong. And for proof of this, I refer to what Leadbeater wrote in chapter five of his book “A Textbook of Theosophy”:

« Mrs. Besant, President of the Theosophical Society, has decided to take new names to name the planes. So in the future this new nomenclature will be used to replace the old names that were given in volume II of my book “The Inner Life”.

Below is a table for reference.

	NEW NAMES	OLD NAMES
1	Divine World	Adi plane
2	Monadic World	Plano Aupapaduka
3	Spiritual World	Atomic or Nirvanic Plane
4	Intuitional World	Buddhic Plane
5	Mental World	Mental Plane
6	Emotional or Astral World	Astral plane
7	Physical World	Physical Plane

»

And as you can see, they are exactly the same names and the same structure that Alice Bailey used for her diagram.

OBSERVATION

However, despite the strong evidence that Leadbeater, Besant and Alice Bailey wrote incorrect things, several of their followers have claimed me that the matter is not for as much and that they do not see why I make "a whole scandal", since there is not much difference between the two structures.

But those who think like this is because they have NOT studied esotericism seriously, because if they had really investigated more deeply, than they would be as outraged as I am, and to prove them, consider the following analogy:

Imagine that Leadbeater in his arrogance decides that the notes of the musical range are incorrect and that therefore he must modify them.

And then he decides to join the “C” with the “D”, and also the “E” with the “F”. And as he eliminated two notes, to continue having seven notes, he invents two new notes (and which we suppose he calls them: “J” and “K”).

So instead of having:

C – D – E – F – G – A – B

Now we have:

CD – EF – G – A – B – J – K

And the one who does not know much about music is going to say:

              -  "I do not see much difference, since there are also seven notes and sound similar, so it can be considered that it is more or less the same."

But instead he who knows music will say:

              -  "But what circus did that guy! How they want me to touch such a jumble of inventions and deformations! This cannot be applied in any real musical score!"

And the same happens to the deformations that Leadbeater invented with esotericism.

• Because having gathered the physical plane with the energetic plane.

• And to have joined the astral plane with the kamasic plane.

• And to have invented the divine plane and the monadic plane.

Leadbeater completely altered the structure taught by the Trans-Himâlayan Masters and this structure IS THE BASE on which everything that exists in the Universe is organized, because of the Correspondence Law that says:

"As is above, is below, as is in the small, is in the great."

And consequently that septenary structure taught by the Masters will also be reflected in all the other aspects of Creation.

For example:

In the macrocosmic scales of the Universe

In the hidden constitution of the humans

In the cosmic evolution that humans make through the seven rounds, since it is in each of these rounds that one of these seven principles is perfected.

And also in the evolution that humans make within each of these rounds through the seven root races.

And these correspondences also you find them:

-      on the sacred planets,

-      in the rays of creation,

-      in the chakras,

-      in the colors,

-      in the musical notes,

-      in the hidden structure of the different kingdoms of nature (the mineral kingdom, the plant kingdom, the animal kingdom), etc.

THESE CORRESPONDENCES ARE EVERYWHERE !!!

And when people alter the basic structure, these correspondences disappear (what happens with the various esoteric pseudo-teachings that have emerged). And that's why while you keep reading only the books of Leadbeater, Besant or Alice Bailey, the structures they teach will seem very consistent.

But the day you want to apply those structures with what the Masters of Shamballa really taught, you will crash because simply those alterations are irreconcilable with the true esoteric teaching.

So it is up to you to decide if you want to keep wasting your time studying false things or if you really want to acquire true esoteric knowledge.