Notice: I have written in other languages, many interesting articles that you
can read translated in English
in these links:
Part 1 and Part 2.


THE ELECTRONS EXPLAINED BY SPENCER LEWIS

 
The following article was published by Harvey Spencer Lewis in his pamphlet Cromaat G (1919) which was reserved exclusively for members of AMORC and in blue I added my comments.
 
 
 
THE TRUTH ABOUT ELECTRONS
 
The following is a comparison of the statements made regarding electrons and atoms by (1st) E.R. Fournier d’Albe in his recent book “The Electron Theory,” and by (2nd) the Rosaecrucian teachings prepared long before such book was published. Note also the comments made under d’Albe's statements, which will help you to appreciate the apparent contradictions and vague ideas held by science in regard to electrons and atoms.
 
 

Fournier d’Albe

R+C

 

(The existence of electrons is assumed from some observations.)

“Us charge consists of what has hitherto been called ‘negative’ electricity.” – page 23.

‘‘The fundamental property of the electron which distinguishes it from ordinary matter Is that it repels another electron instead of attracting It. as two pieces of matter do” – page 23.

(This statement assumes that there is matter in addition to electrons.)

 

 

(The existence of the electron is known from law and experiment.)

Electrons have either negative or positive charges: there being two kinds of electrons.

(This is false since only negative electrons exist.)

Electrons may repeal each, other or attract each other on the basis that like repeals like and attracts unlike, — negative attracting positive. etc.

 

“Each atom contains a number of electrons, but their electrical action is compensated by some force within the atom which, for lack of a better term, we may call ‘positive electricity’.” – page 26

(This statement attempts to explain away the fact that a number of negative electrons do hold together in an atom instead of repelling each other; therefore the admission of the existence of some unknown form of positive electricity within the atom.)

 

Atoms are composed of two or more electrons, half of which are positive or negative electrons: the attraction between these unlike electrons unites them; therefore each atom has both positive and negative charges within it.

(Lewis was not updated because Ernest Rutherford had already discovered the existence of protons the year before.)

 

“We have, therefore, reason to suppose that in any uncharged lump of a divalent metal —say a ball of copper— there are at least twice as many electrons as there are atoms” – page 26.

 

There can be no metal or piece of matter in any form composed of atoms which is not charged with both positive and negative electricity due to the presence of positive and negative electrons in the atoms composing all matter.

(This is incorrect because in normal conditions the charge of electrons and protons is neutralized.)

 

“Since the connection between the atoms and these electrons is not rigid, we may, suppose that this proportion (that there are twice as many electrons as atoms) is liable to variations.” – page 26.

(Herein we note the first supposition regarding something so fundamental that it should be of positive knowledge.)

 

The so-called “connection” or pro­ portion between electrons In every atom is rigid according to a very definate law of harmony and proportion, and not left open to chance. The Divine Mind is the directing chemist.

(This is also incorrect because we now know that the proportion of electrons can vary in each atom.)

 

“When the electrons are in excess of the usual number, we find that the boll is negatively charged; when there is a deficiency the ball is positively charged.” – page 27.

(The term “usual number” would indicate that the scientist is aware of the fact that there is some law of proportion for the number of electrons in an atom, but how then can there be an excess of electrons in any atom?)

(Various phenomena allow this, and the negative atom is called an anion and the positive atom is called a cation.)

 

When an atom contains one more negative electron than positive the atom has a negative polarity, and when there is one more positive electron the atom has a positive polarity; thus, Atoms, Like electrons, have either positive or negative charges due to predominance of either negative nr positive electrons in the atom.

“An atom at rest” is one which contains three or more electrons, where there can be one more positive than negative or one more negative than positive electrons.

When an atom is composed of only two electrons, it is not stationary in its nature, because, it naturally seeks either one more positive or one more negative electron to overcome its neutral condition, or disintegration follows as the result of its neutrality.

(With each different element the neutrality of the atom that composes it varies.)

This fact or law is utilized in the processes of transmutation and a principal of this law is manifested in the radio-active minerals where certain atoms with in the molecules are liberating their neutral electrons.

(This is false and actually the transmutation occurs because the nucleus of the atom splits.)

 

“It follows from the law of attraction that an electron cannot be removed from a neutral atom without a very great force as compared with its mass.” – page 30.

(If all the electrons are negative how can there be the law of attraction working between them or on them or with them?

If, according to the foregoing statements, a neutral atom is one which contains only negative electrons, since positive electrons are denied, these electrons would repel each other, according to d’Albe's own statements.)

(If Lewis were informed then he would know of the existence of protons which are positively charged particles.)

 

It is true that the force of attraction existing between a negative and positive electron in a neutral atom is the greatest force known in consideration of its mass.

If this force could be released from the atoms found in ordinary pieces of matter, it would be sufficient to run the most powerful engines and motors.

 

"The attraction between the electrons In a neutral atom is the strongest cohesive force we know.” – page 30.

(Can this refer to the attraction between negative electrons which we were previously told Is repulsion, or what is it?)

 

Both cohesion and adhesion in atoms and molecules are accounted for by the attraction due to the force of attraction created by the negative and positive polar of like and unlike electrons in all ities or charges of atoms and molecules because of the presence atoms.

 

"Of course, the electrons in a solid metal have widely varying velocities.” – page 33.

The electrons in all matter or composing all atoms have two actions which they transmit to and make a similar property bf the atom — namely, a revolving motion on their own axis and a radiation of the fundamental spirit energy within them at the rate of so many vibrations per second.

(This Lewis is making it up.)

The rate of vibrations, so far as even and uneven number are concerned, constituting the negative or positive charge of the individual electron; and the combined vibrations of the electrons in the atom constituting the nature of the manifestation of the atom or. In other words, its chemical property.

 

"In other words, what is the work, required to bring a company of electrons from infinite to the surface bf the earth? ... For the charge of the earth is negative. It repels electrons and attracts positive atoms.” – page 69.

(Granting that the, earth IS negative In its polarity, it would repel all electrons if all electrons were negative; and assuming that this is true and that all electrons ate negative, again we may ask what constitutes a positive atom which the earth so strangely attracts?)

(This is explained by the existence of cations, which are not attracted from space but created on Earth through chemical and electromagnetic phenomena.)

 

Electrons have their source in the infinite, but are directed toward the earth in positive and negative form or nature, In order to constitute the material existence or manifestation of things.

The earth itself, being composed of gross matter, Is potentially negative because of the negative polarity of a predominating number of its atoms and molecules, and throughout all space the negative electrons attract the positive electrons, the negative atoms attract the positive atoms, and in this way atoms and molecules are formed and matter is brought into such form as permits its vibrations of the spirit energy to manifest to us grossly enough to be perceived by our gross objective senses.

(This is also being made up by Lewis.)

 

“It Is likely, therefore, that an electron theory of the chemical atom will shortly come into being. Such a theory is made necessary by the facts of radioactivity where atoms are found throwing off electrons and positive particles. These electrons and positive particles must therefore have been constituents of the atom.” – page 282

(This means that the recent discovery of radioactivity has, upset all the previous theories regarding matter and its composition, whereas, if the theories had been true the observation of radioactivity should have supplied science with the best proof or evidence of the correctness of the theories. Furthermore, in the above statement reluctance is shown to call the radiating electrons by the proper names, negative and positive electrons.)

 

Such chemical theory or law of the composition of matter is well known in the R+C teachings where it has been held for many years, that the atom is composed of negative and positive electrons; and radioactive minerals demonstrate this law by their action, which action never puzzled the R+C student nor has he had to, seek elsewhere than in his own teachings to know that such radio-action was a process of disintegration, where molecules were releasing the atoms and the atoms freeing the electrons into space once more.

(This is false since radioactivity emits radiation, not atoms or electrons.)

 

 
 
(p.13-16)
 
 
 
 
 
OBSERVATION
 
It is very deplorable that Spencer Lewis should criticize the research that scientists were doing on atoms and electrons, claiming that he was a great eminence and that his allegations came from the Rosicrucian teaching, when it is evident that in reality his explanations are speculations that he himself made and which, to make matters worse, are full of errors and falsehoods. And this is one more example of how ignorant, conceited and charlatan was the founder of AMORC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

ANALYSIS OF PLATO'S ACCOUNT OF ATLANTIS

 
 
 
THE PARABLE OF ATLANTIS
 
KRITIAS-TIMAIOS
 
By Alexander Wilder, M.D.
 
The name of Kritias, which Plato prefixed to the last of the Dialogues, was by no means popular in Athens. Belonging to one of the most honored families, his career had not been worthy, or of benefit to his country. For a time Kritias had been one of the followers of Socrates, but upon being remonstrated with for his gross misconduct, he turned from his teacher, and even became a bitter enemy. Taking part in some of the revolutions after the death of Pericles, Kritias was banished from Athens. He returned, however, some years afterward, at the time that Lysander entered the city, and was appointed a member of the Council of Thirty, which had been created to frame a new constitution for the city. His ascendancy was characterized by the capital execution of several thousand individuals. He issued an edict for bidding lectures and discourse upon philosophy and liberal learning. At the end of four months the Athenians regained the control of public affairs and Kritias was slain in a partisan conflict.
 
Despite the apparent incongruity of representing him as sustaining friendly relations with Socrates, whom he actually had endeavored to involve in serious difficulty and peril, it was evidently in the mind of Plato to leave a remembrance of him which would be more favorable, showing characteristics of real merit, and perhaps to relieve his name from somewhat of the obloquy resting upon it. He was an uncle of the philosopher and had endeavored to introduce his nephew into the public service and otherwise promote his welfare. Possibly one of the reasons for his hostility to Socrates had been for his influence in attracting the young man from politics to philosophy; and it may be that Plato himself, though he had refused to enter public life under the conditions then prevailing, nevertheless cherished gratitude for the efforts in his behalf; and perhaps there were·also considerations of family affection, which, indeed, in those days were regarded as of transcendent importance.
 
Socrates had been represented in The Republic as having described the commonwealth as it should be constituted, how its citizens should be reared and instructed, and what is required for the public defense and for the permanency and welfare of the entire community.
 
Kritias, who has been a silent listener, is now mentioned by him as being thoroughly informed in these matters, and begins to tell of an Athens of many thousand years before, that had been established on such principles, and had maintained them successfully and alone, in a war between the peoples of Greece and Atlantis.
 
He gives way, however, to the philosopher Timaios, whose extended account of the origin of the universe, the human race and other inhabitants, has already been noticed. He then follows in his turn with a record which had been preserved in the family of Solon, and declared to be in every respect true. When Solon had completed the remodeling of the government of Athens and observed the effect of his changes, he made a journey to Egypt. The former restrictions upon foreigners had been relaxed, and at the order of the king, Amosis II, who lived at Sais, he was admitted to the instructions which were given at the temple of the goddess Neith (1). Endeavoring to draw them out in relation to matters of antiquity he affected to boast of the progenitors of the Hellenic peoples.
 
''Ah, Solon, Solon,'' responded the oldest priest of the group, "you Greeks are nothing but boys, and there is not a Greek of any age really mature. You have no traditions, no learning that is of any great antiquity.'' Then the old man went on to tell of many great deluges, many devastations by catastrophe and volcanic action, remarkable changes in the configuration of the sky and other wonderful events.
 
Then, he adds, there was an Athens, which had been founded nine thousand years before and a thousand years before Saïs itself. It was a model city, and its customs had been such as the Saïtes themselves had been eager to copy. The goddess herself, Neith-Athena, the tutelary alike of each of the cities, had established them. There were the sacred class devoted to religion and learning; the craftsmen of different kinds, who meddled with none outside their guild; the shepherds, huntsmen and tillers of the soil.
 
There were also the soldiers who followed no other calling. Likewise, in regard to the superior knowledge, the law took cognizance of it from the beginning, not only in respect to all the universe, but even to divination and the medical art with regard to hygiene, and hence from these divine subjects to human affairs generally and the branches of learning connected with them. The goddess of wisdom selected the site of Athens because she foresaw that its wholesome climate would favor the growth of a superior race of men, wise like herself. Then under these auspices, and what is better, under a good government (2), there sprang up a people surpassing all others in every thing meritorious, as became those who were the offspring and under the tutelage of the gods.
 
Nine thousand years before, says the Egyptian priest, there existed a state of war over the known world. Beyond the Pillars of Heracles the ocean was at that time open and navigable for galleys, and there existed fronting the continent an island larger than Libya and Asia Minor together. There were likewise other islands which were in alliance with it, and they were subject to a powerful confederation of kings, who also held the western regions of Europe and Africa under their dominion.
 
At that period Athens was foremost among the commonwealths of Greece. It was distinguished for the superiority of its population in moral stamina, in the arts, and in war. At first that city was leader of the Greek peoples, but finally they all stood aloof, leaving Athens to maintain alone the conflict with the kings of Atlantis. The invaders were routed, and independence was thus preserved for the free states, and won for all others within the pillars of Heracles.
 
Afterward there came a succession of violent earthquakes and floods. In a single day and night the people of Athens were buried beneath the earth, and the island of Atlantis was engulfed in the waters. Hence only mud remains where that region once existed, and the ocean where it existed formerly is neither navigable nor even accessible.
 
According to the ancient legends the whole earth was originally apportioned among the gods. There was no contest among them in order that one might seize the domain of the other. But each one occupied the portion allotted, peopled it, and attended to the welfare of those under his charge. The gods did not coerce their subjects arbitrarily, but, like skilful pilots, led them by persuasions. The domain of each was assigned according to his peculiar character.
 
As Hephaestos and Athena, having the same father and disposition, were also alike in the love of wisdom and liberal art, Athens was assigned jointly to them as being adapted naturally to superior excellence and intelligence. Here they planted the autochthones, natives of the soil, making the men good and orderly. Owing to the devastations of the floods the records of these times were lost. The survivors could not read, and hence only names were preserved. These included women as well as men, because both sexes engaged alike in the pursuits of war. In accordance with that usage they dedicated a statue of the goddess armed as a soldier, in recognition of the fact that all living beings associating together, female, as well as male, have the natural ability common to each race to follow every meritorious pursuit.
 
The dominion of Athens, as the priest declared, then extended over all the territory of Attika. The region was much larger than in later periods, for floods had not then washed away the earth, and the soil was very productive. The population was composed of craftsmen in the various callings, and of those who labored at agriculture. There was also the noble caste of warriors, twenty thousand in number, who had been set apart originally by the divine founders of the Commonwealth. Its members lived apart from the others, on the higher ground around the temples. They held their possessions in common, eating at a common table, and sustaining no familiar relations with the other citizens in the lower districts, except as was necessary to procure food and other matters of necessity.
 
From this caste were taken the guardians of the commonwealth, the defenders of the country, the rulers and magistrates. Such being their quality, and their administration of affairs, both in their own community and in the rest of Greece being just, they were distinguished over Europe and Asia, both for personal beauty and moral excellence. Kritias insists accordingly that the Athens of that far-off time was like the commonwealth which had been described in the philosophical dialogue.
 
When at the beginning the whole earth was apportioned among the gods to assure their worship and sacrifices, the Atlantic island was in the allotment of Poseidon (3). Among the natives of Atlantis was Evenor, whose daughter, Kleito, won the regard of the divine overlord. Poseidon accordingly constructed a residence for her on the island, surrounding it with high belts of land alternating with other zones of sea. For at that time ships and navigation were not known. She became the mother of ten sons, in five pairs, on whom Poseidon bestowed dominion. The oldest was placed over his mother's home and the region about it, which was the largest and most desirable in the island. He was also made king over the whole territory.
 
The other brothers also received rich allotments and were appointed to sovereignty in subordination to the eldest. He also gave them names, which Kritias explains as having been translated into Greek. The designation of the oldest brother, Atlas, may evoke some question. Not only is it the name of a range of mountains in Africa, but the term Atlan is also used for titles of places in America.
 
These princes and their descendants, we are told, dwelt for many generations as rulers in the "Sea of Islands," and extended their dominion to the Continent, including in it all Libya as far as Egypt and Europe clear to Italy. The family of Atlas surpassed all the others. The oldest son succeeded the father, and they all possessed wealth beyond the power of computing. Much of this was procured from foreign countries, but their principal riches was obtained in the island itself. Atlantis abounded in rich ores. One of these, orichalkon, or mountain copper, was next in value to gold itself. Kritias declares that only the name was known; nevertheless one may ask whether platinum was meant.
 
There was also wood produced in abundance suitable for building and other purposes; and also grass and other plants for the food of animals, both wild and tame. There was even a profusion of food for elephants, of which there were great numbers. Nature, with the aid of human ingenuity thus supplied in plenty whatever would excite the palate, please the sick or gratify the fancy.
 
The enterprise and industry of the population are glowingly described. Atlantis abounded in temples, magnificent houses, and in ports and docks for commerce. The belts of water with which Poseidon had surrounded the metropolis were bridged over, thus giving access to the royal residence. A canal was likewise constructed, three hundred feet wide and a hundred feet deep, extending from the ocean to the outermost zone of water. Tunnels were also made through the belts of land so that the zone of water became a harbor for vessels. A high wall of stone was erected at the outermost belt of land which surrounded the metropolis, and other walls of similar structure were built at the interior circuits. The outer wall was covered with a coating of copper; the next wall was coated with silver, and the innermost wall with orichalkon, which shone with a ruddy glow.
 
The stone with which these walls were built had been quarried on the central island, and there were three kinds, white, red and black. Many of the buildings were in plain style, but in others the three kinds of stone were ingeniously combined so as to produce an agreeable effect.
 
At the beginning a magnificent building was erected as a dwelling for the divinity and for the ancestors. Each monarch as he came to power added to its embellishments, endeavoring to excel those who had preceded him, till it became wonderful for size and the beauty of the works.
 
Kritias proceeds now to describe the wealth and luxury of the people of Atlantis. Inside the citadel was the temple dedicated to Kleito and Poseidon. It was surrounded by an enclosure of gold. There were brought to it every year contributions from the ten principalities, and sacrifices were presented to each of the divinities. There was also a temple to Poseidon himself, over six hundred feet long and three hundred wide, built and adorned with Oriental splendor. The body of the edifice was coated with silver, and the pinnacles with gold. Inside of the building, the roof was of ivory; and it was adorned everywhere with gold, silver and orichalkon. All the other parts of the wall and floor were lined with orichalkon.
 
There were numerous statues of gold. The god himself was represented standing upon a car attached to which were six winged horses, his head touching the roof, as he stood. A hundred Nereids riding on dolphins were by him, indicating that he was the tutelary of the ocean as well as of the seismic territories. Other statutes likewise, some the gift of private individuals and others presented from the subordinate princedoms were placed there, part of them inside and part outside the building. In short, the whole was of a style and magnificence corresponding with the government and the splendor which attended the public worship.
 
The principal island abounded with springs, both cold and hot, which the inhabitants employed for their private fountains. They built their houses around them, placing tanks in them, some for cold water to use in summer and others for hot water in winter. The baths for the royal family were apart from the others, and those for the women separate from those of the men. There were also baths for the horses and cattle, all of which were kept scrupulously clean.
 
The stream of water which flowed from this region, was conducted to the Grove of Poseidon, a sacred domain, where were trees of every kind, growing to prodigious size and height. The water was carried thence by aqueducts to the circles outside.
 
On the island were many temples dedicated to different divinities, and likewise public gardens and places of exercise, some for men and some for horses. There was a race-course in the largest island, over a furlong wide and extending the whole way around the circumference for contests of speed between the horses.
 
There were barracks for the troops; part in the belt of land next the citadel, and part inside, near the royal quarters. The docks were filled with triremes and naval stores.
 
Such were the conditions about the royal residence. Crossing the three harbors, one came to a wall which went completely around, beginning from the sea and fifty furlongs from the outermost harbor near the metropolis. This enclosed both the entrance of the canal and the entrance to the ocean. This area was covered with buildings densely crowded together. The canal and harbor were always full of vessels, and thus there was an incessant din kept up day and night.
 
The rest of the country differed in many particulars. The whole region had a high elevation above the level of the sea. There was an extensive plain immediately surrounding the city, which was encircled by a range of mountains sloping toward the sea. The country was of oblong shape extending over three thousand stadia (or about forty miles) and about two thousand directly across. It lay toward the south, and so was sheltered from the north. The mountains were numerous and beautiful, and there were many villages, rivers, lakes, and meadows, which supplied food in abundance, and likewise wood suitable for all kinds of work.
 
A deep canal extended around the plain, ten thousand fur-longs in length. It received the water from the mountains, and winding round the plain, discharged it into the ocean. Other canals were also constructed for transportation of wood and commercial products and likewise for irrigation in summer.
 
The public defense was provided by a militia system carefully arranged. The plain on the island was divided into sixty thousand lots of the dimension of a stadium (or 660 feet) each way. Then it was ordered that of the men fit for service each individual commander should have an allotment, a hundred stadia in extent. In the mountainous districts and the rest of the country was also a large population, and to every man was assigned a lot by the commander. Each of these commanders was required to furnish the sixth part of a war-car, two horses, a two-horse car without a seat, a car-driver with a fighting man, also two armed soldiers, two archers, two slingers, besides light-armed men, stone-shooters and javelin-hurlers, with four sailors so as to man twelve hundred vessels. The other nine sovereign-ties had arrangements that were somewhat different.
 
The institutions of government continued as they had been arranged from the beginning. Each of the ten kings ruled individually in his own district and commonwealth. All was conducted according to the ordinances of Poseidon.
 
The first kings had also recorded their ordinances on a tablet of orichalkon which was deposited in the temple of that divinity. Every fifth or sixth year they assembled there in council, in which each took an equal part for the general welfare.
 
They made investigation into the procedures of each in his own dominion, and judged them accordingly. In order to assure the faithful submission of each they sacrificed a bull beside the inscribed regulations. Then was an oath written there denouncing execrations on the disobedient. Making each a libation of the blood of the animal, they renewed the oath to do justice, to punish offenders rigidly, never to transgress the laws, and never to rule or obey any ruler except according to the laws. Then having partaken of supper together, they dressed themselves in robes of dark blue color, and proceeded to scrutinize each other's procedures of administration. Their decisions in each case were inscribed on a golden tablet, which was deposited in the temple together with their robes of office.
 
The ten kings were obligated not to make war on one another, but to give their aid in case of any movement to exterminate any royal family. The supreme dominion over the whole was thus assigned to the Atlantic family, but a king was not permitted to put any of them to death without approval of half the others.
 
For many generations, so long as the inherited nature of the god their ancestor remained to aid them, they continued obedient to the laws and held in affectionate regard their kindred divine parentage. For they were possessed of a genuine high-mindedness and noble principles, and also combined mildness with discretion in incidental matters and in their relations with one another. They held everything in low esteem except it was meritorious; thought lightly of riches, and were not intoxicated by luxury. Being thus circumspect in conduct, they were quick to perceive that all these benefits are increased by friendship combined with virtue; but that when too eagerly sought after and overvalued, they became corrupt and worthless.
 
To such consideration as this, and to the divine nature which continued inherent in them, was due their great prosperity. But eventually the divine quality which was hereditary b them was effaced by much and frequent intermingling in nuptial union with the mortal element; and so the moral character common to other men became ascendant. They became unable to cope with events, and began also to behave unbecomingly. To those who could discern, they appeared to have parted with their most excellent qualities, and to have become ignoble and base. Yet though they were greedy and oppressive, they seemed to those who were unable to appreciate true blessedness, to be in the highest degree happy and fortunate.
 
It was then that Zeus, the supreme God who rules by laws, and is able to descry these things, perceived a noble race involved in wretched conditions. He resolved to call it to account, in order that its members might again be made watchful and return to the sense of what is right. Accordingly he assembled all the gods in council in their most holy habitation. This being at the centre of the universe, commands a view of everything belonging to the region of change below. Having collected them together he proceeded to announce his purpose.
 
 
~ * ~
 
Here the story of Kritias abruptly concludes and a sentence is left unfinished. There is a tradition that Plato's death took place while engaged in writing; and as the trilogy is unfinished, it would appear as though this was the point at which his work was interrupted. Perhaps, however, he was in the habit of writing his composition as he had matter and opportunity, and was awaiting the moment at which to resume.
 
Modem critics are generally agreed in declaring the story a myth. Yet it was anciently believed by many to be substantially the record of actual fact. The present condition of the Atlantic Ocean at a distance beyond the Strait of Gibraltar, seems to indicate that the tale of the submergence of large islands at that region is not without plausibility. Other ancient writers have accepted the belief of a populous country, somewhere in that direction; and Mr. J.D. Baldwin in his treatise on "Prehistoric Nations," cites from Pere de Bourbourg, to show the existence of a dominion in Central America greatly resembling that of Atlantis. There may be as much unwisdom in the ignotum pro absurdo as in ignotum pro magnifico (unknown for absurd as unknown for magnificent).
 
Parables are not altogether fictitious narratives. Occult symbolism often employs peculiar names, historic occurrences, and analogous matters for its purposes, and even intermingles its problems with them. It is not at all necessary in ascribing a figurative character to the story of Atlantis, to doubt the genuineness of the legend respecting it. That may be left wisely to future exploration.
 
In this dialogue, the former Athens is indicated as a model government where the best of the citizens, the aristoi, managed all the public affairs. Kritias accordingly declares it to be such a commonwealth as had been depicted in The Republic. He intermingles allusions incident to its history, such as the leading of the other cities of Greece, and sometimes as fighting alone, as was the case in the long conflict with Persia.
 
Atlantis is described as a confederation of kingdoms, such as Greece may have been in the early periods. It has Poseidon for its overlord, as did most of the Grecian states, and the monarchies which deteriorated to corrupt and unendurable despotisms. The overthrow of these is represented in legends by the exploits of Theseus and Herakles; and the story of Atlantis seems to have been brought to an analogous period of such a character.
 
In the rival nations, Athens and Atlantis, are likewise symbolic representations of man in his moral and spiritual conditions. In the Athenian commonwealth he is faultless, his tastes and talent are kept employed and his several relations personal and social, are observed after the most exemplary manner. For the ideal state has its correspondent likeness in the ideal man; and the influence of that man and the ideal extend over the whole earth.
 
Atlantis in like manner represents man in the other phase of character. We have the spectacle of ten kings, sons of Poseidon, ten being the number denoting completeness. As Poseidon ruled his domain by arbitrary law, so the dominion is strictly arranged. All that is needed is provided and arranged. Every want is met, every desire anticipated. So long as the hereditary divine quality and its influence are dominant all goes on well. But as with man when developing into adult life, there comes admixture from without. There are lapses from primitive integrity. As flatterers and time servers do not take notice of this in a monarch, so the individual is apt not to be conscious of serious dereliction in himself. Only those capable of discerning the spirit, the divinely illuminated, perceive the fall and its accompaniments.
 
There are both an Athens of unblemished fame and an enfeebled, demoralized Atlantis in every human being. ''So,'' says Paul, "with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin."
 
To this point, the speaker draws our attention. What is beyond is left for conjecture. The catastrophe of Atlantis has been told, but only as a physical occurrence. It is also added that Zeus himself, the supreme Arbiter, is about to take in hand the correcting of the unrighteous conditions and restoration to primeval order.
 
Thus we have the problem; it is ours individually to solve.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes
 
1. The names, "Saïs" and "Neith," are ·words of two syllables, the vowels not being diphthonged, are to be pronounced separately.
 
2. Konfucius was journeying with his disciples through a distant region. Meeting a woman by a well, he questioned her of her husband, her father and other kindred. They had all been killed by a tiger, she replied. “Why,” demanded the sage, “why do you not remove from a region that is infested by such a ferocious beast.”
 
“Because,” replied she, “we have a good government.” Turning to his disciples, the sage remarked: “See, a bad government is more feared than a ravenous tiger.”
 
3. Mr. Robert Brown Jr., of Barton·on·Humber, England, has given in his little treatise, ''Poseidon,'' a very full account of the parts of the globe anciently regarded as subject to this divinity and not to Zeus. He was regarded as overlord in the countries of the Mediterranean and Archipelago, except in Egypt and parts of Greece. The voyages of Ulysses or Odysseus were supposed to have taken place in the region allotted to him. Hence the defiance of Polyphemos, the Kyklops, to the authority of Zeus. The voyages of Aeneas were in that region, and it is noteworthy that the principal personages and monsters which were fabled to have been slain by Theseus and Herakles were connected with him, indicating by allegory a change in religion as well as in civil government.
 
 
(The Word, May 1906, p.82-92)