One
of his many barbarities, Osho decided that his followers should be sterilized,
and below, I transcribe the texts that I have found about this issue:
Win McCormack's article
Win McCormack is a journalist who has
extensively investigated Osho and his movement, and on this subject he wrote
the following:
According to Sarah T. and numerous other former
sannyasins, Rajneesh strongly discouraged his female disciples from having
children and strongly encouraged women followers —especially his women
administrators— to have themselves sterilized.
Sarah recalls that in 1980, the year before Rajneesh
left India, nearly all the top women in the ashram hierarchy underwent
sterilization at the ashram medical center. The method of sterilization used
there, she says, was cauterization of the fallopian tubes.
(www.newrepublic.com/article/147871/bhagwans-sexism)
Satya Franklin's testimony
Satya Franklin was a close member of
Osho.
Sheela (who
was Osho's chief administrator) had a hysterectomy and
I believe she was the first.
Bhagwan felt children were a distraction
from the spiritual path. He said the nuclear family is a disease." He
deterred one of Sheela's entourage from having a child by advising her to
"borrow" a friend's for a week and see if she still wanted one.
But the idea of the sterilization
was that if you didn't want to have kids anyway and people had multiple sexual
partners, it was not unreasonable. Not every man, but scores had vasectomies. I
know people who left became angry about the sterilizations. They were livid
that their lives were ruined.
Were people forced to be sterilized?
People were told if you want to
be on a spiritual path this is good to do. They were not forced, but if they
didn't they were at risk of losing their ashram job or being asked to leave.
People were not encouraged to be pregnant, that's for sure.
(www.newsweek.com/wild-wild-country-sex-cult-member-reveals-truth-about-orgies-sterilizations-876747)
Lily Dunn's testimony
Lily Dunn knew the Osho commune in
England very well
Those families who raised their children within the ashram and at
Rajneeshpuram were encouraged to give them up to the greater good of the
multiparent family. It was forbidden, from the age of five, for children to
sleep with their parents. Children were considered to obstruct their parent’s
personal development. Many men, including my father, were encouraged to have a
vasectomy on joining the movement; many women were sterilised, some when they
were young.
In a recent series of articles for The New Republic, Win McCormack,
author of The Rajneesh Chronicles (2010), writes that among the
thousands of followers who lived and worked at Rajneeshpuram over the four
years of its existence, not one baby was born within the commune.
There was a Facebook page dedicated to a young woman who had attempted
to reverse her sterilisation, done at Poona, aged just 19. Years later, she’d
fallen in love and wanted to have a baby. She was 33, the same age I was when I
saw the posting and had my first child. It is a much more straightforward
procedure for a man to reverse a vasectomy than for a woman to reverse
sterilisation. The young woman had died.
(www.aeon.co/essays/lost-innocence-the-children-whose-parents-joined-an-ashram)
Win McCormack's second article
I found this Win McCormack article, and
there he wrote:
Rajneesh did not want his
followers to have children, a subject I wrote about in “Bhagwan’s Strange
Eugenics.” Rajneesh made the following statement to the INS in an interview in
Portland on October 14, 1982:
-
“Just as murder is
considered by the society, so the birth of a child should be considered by the
commune.”
He wasn’t kidding. Rajneesh required
that all his top women officials have themselves sterilized, and he encouraged
his other disciples to do the same. If a woman got
pregnant at the Pune ashram in India or Rajneeshpuram in Oregon, she was given
a stark choice: Agree to have an abortion, or leave the property forthwith. There
were zero children born in Oregon to Rajneesh cult members during the time the
commune was extant.
“Bhagwan
told his followers that a woman could not become enlightened if she had a
child,” a former disciple informed me, “because it would take away from her
vital energy. It took so much energy to become enlightened that if
you had a child, you wouldn’t have the energy to pursue that path.”
Actually, the reason Bhagwan did
not want his followers to have children was the same reason he did not care for
them to have stable, committed, loving relationships: Having a child might
motivate its parents to forsake the commune for a more normal, adult lifestyle.
(Source: https://newrepublic.com/article/147657/outside-limits-human-imagination
)
Discussion
I found this discussion in a sannyasins forum.
Parmartha
commented:
When I worked in a big department
in the then ashram, a number of “workers” both male and female got sterilised,
and this procedure was given free to those who were seen as dedicated.
The ashram even gave reasons for
workers to consider. I no longer believe these reasons came directly from Osho
but they were sometimes enunciated as if they did.
One was a perfectly valid reason
and still very true today: overpopulation is killing the planet.
Another common point coming from
middle managers in the ashram was that children hindered personal growth and
meditation: being a seeker one had to be one pointed and plan a life free from
distraction. This reason seems more dubious: surely meditation needs to be
tested amongst the noises and chaos of the world…
Another reason given to female
workers who were considering sterilisation was that they could become more
orgasmic and live without fear of pregnancy. Maybe so, but lets face it many
people got sexually transmitted diseases, so even that is a mixed-up reason.
During my 40 years of sannyas and
being addicted somewhat to networking, I have met a fair few female sannyasins
who regretted, in hindsight, their sterilisations, and one does wonder about
it. In the best conversation I had about the topic, the sannyasin concerned
said that sterilisation should have been only for the very few. It should never
have been a “fashion”.
Kavita
said:
I have heard too many stories of Osho insisting on
having sterilization and also encouraging abortions in his Commune. Well, if
that’s true I am sure he had his reasons.
Madhu
replied:
I could very well relate to your
contribution, although ´my story´ is quite another one, having gone through
abortion issues long ago, regret and much pain. It´s a scar in my case.
Lokesh
replied:
There
is nothing perfectly valid about this reasoning at all, if put in its correct
context. Most of the sannyasins who underwent sterilization in Poona 1 were
westerners. What does overpopulation have to do with countries like Scotland?
Nothing. Same goes for a number of countries in Europe. A lack of young people is putting a strain on pension systems etc.
To
believe that those sterilizations helped the world’s overpopulation in any way
illustrates a time when people were undergoing the worst kind of brainwashing,
because it is pure bullshit.
Another
common point coming from middle managers in the ashram was that children
hindered personal growth and meditation. More bullshit. The truth is quite the
opposite. Many enlightened men and women in the past were also parents.
One of the main recruiters for
sterilization in Poona 1 was Diksha. She later apologized for any damage done.
Many young women of that time lost their capacity to bear children and later
deeply regretted it. One of the more unsavoury aspects of Poona 1. It is
history now. Perhaps some will learn from the mistakes we made
during those times and then perhaps something good will come of it.
Bottom
line is think for yourself and question all authority. Osho was seen as an
authority during those times and so were people like Diksha, who actually
coerced and encouraged people to have those ops. It was ridiculous and a good
reflection of the downside of those crazy times, times when people were ready
to give up everything, including their critical faculties and common sense…and
for what exactly? Enlightenment?
Does anyone know of just one
person who became enlightened due in part to undergoing a sterilization
operation in Poona 1? Just the question frames the absurdity of the whole
carry-on.
Simond
commented:
Lokesh, you describe it well, how
in one way or another, and in this case, in the matter of sterilisation, how we
have all been duped or fooled by the ignorance and the authority of others.
We are born into an ignorant
world, with parents who are themselves ignorant, and teachers who are lost. It
is a wonder any of us learn. But some of do see through the veil, like Lokesh
which makes you a delight to read.
The sterilisation issue seems a
perfect example of how some were duped into an action they later regret and see
was totally ignorant and unnecessary.
(www.sannyasnews.org/now/archives/5961)
OBSERVATIONS
Several Osho
followers think that it was not he who gave those directives, but his
administrators. But as you could verify, witnesses asserted that those directives
were given by Osho himself, and he was also who claimed that having children was
an obstacle to spiritual development.
Something
that is totally false because all the true masters that I know, they assure
that having children and raising them properly is one of the greatest teachings
that life gives you, because children teach you to develop: patience, understanding,
responsibility, affection, and many other qualities more.
And Osho was
also the one who put the pretext of overpopulation so that his followers would
be sterilized, check his books "Ultimate
Philosophy" and "The Last
Testament I".
And that is
also a true fallacy, because what causes overpopulation is not procreating
children, but procreating too many children. And if you don't believe me, ask
the Europeans and the Japanese.
But as the
witnesses pointed out, the followers who did not want to abort or sterilize, they
were threatened to have to leave the ashram, and fanatical as his followers
were, they preferred to obey so as not to leave his guru. But later, when the
brainwashing had faded, many of them were repentant.
No comments:
Post a Comment