Notice: I have written in other languages, many interesting articles that you
can read translated in English in this
link.

Showing posts with label Theosophical Movement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theosophical Movement. Show all posts

FERDINAND T. BROOKS




There is very little information about this theosophist.

Ferdinand T. Brooks was an Irishman who became interested in Theosophy, so he went to India in 1900 and became a close associate of Annie Besant, who became president of the Theosophical Society in 1907.

Brooks was a tutor to Jawaharlal Nehru, who later became Prime Minister of India.

Brooks became aware of the delusions into which Annie Besant was falling, and for this reason, he published three books detailing several of the negative things he witnessed.




1. The Theosophical Society and its Esoteric Boyeydom

Originally published by Thompson & Co., Madrás, 1914. Reprinted by Edmonton Theosophical Society, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1991.





2. Neo-Theosophy Exposed

That means the pseudo-theosophy of Leadbeater and Besant being exposed. This book was originally published by Thompson & Co., Madras, 1914. Reprinted by Edmonton Theosophical Society, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1991.

·        Facsímil in pdf





3. My Resignation

The entire títle is "My Resignation or the sequel of my heresies," originally was published by Vyasashrama Book Shop, Madras, 1914 or 1915.

Unfortunately, this book has not been digitized.

Above, I've included a photo of the cover, which is Mr. Brooks's public statement regarding his resignation from the Theosophical Society of Adyar, due to the organization's mismanagement by Annie Besant.

The cover reads:

« The Religion which rises above sectarianism is Theosophy, no matter when o where.

The Polities which rises above party-interests is Theosophy, no matter when o where.

The Good of Man and World, no matter when o where — the Truthfulness by which Truth becomes known, the Services by which Happiness grows — that is Theosophy.

Whereas —

The 'Theosophy' which subordinates the Good of Man, no matter when o where, to the exaltation of a person of the pushing of a Policy, is not never was and never be Theosophy.

In justice to a great and noble Word. In this he known. »











THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1886 AND BLAVATSKY


(This article was published in The World newspaper of New York on September 12, 1886, p. 13; I added subheadings for ease of reading, and in purple and in parentheses I corrected errors.)



THEOSOPHY IN NEW YORK

Facts about Mme. Blavatsky, Her Powers and Her Religion

Brilliant Bohemian Gatherings at the Lamasery — Intellectual New Yorkers at the feet of the Marvellous Russian Countess — The Mediums Outdone — Votaries of the Buddhist Teacher — Is She a Freemason?


A few days ago a Hindoo was thrown into jail for preaching Buddhism at the Ocean Grove Camp-Meetings.  “The Aryan Theosophical Society of New York” has been expounding and disseminating the gospel of Buddha here for nearly ten years with quiet and unimpeded persistency.

It was William Q. Judge, President of this society and editor of the Path, the organ of Theosophy in America, that went to the rescue of the aggressive Hindoo Sattay and secured his release.

Local interest is thus revived in a movement strangely at variance alike with conventional Christianity and with nineteenth-century materialism.

In other cities, also, Theosophy has recently achieved sensational notoriety.

In Washington, Prof. Elliott Coues, one of the foremost scientists of the Smithsonian Institution, astonished his friends and the public by declaring his complete acceptance of the ideas and tenets of Theosophy.

In Boston the wife of a prominent literary man, herself a woman of rare intellectual gifts and great social influence, became insane through studying Theosophy.

In Cincinnati a lady of wealth and position is worshipped by hundreds and pretends to have reached the highest state of psychological development in deification and, like Alexander, claims divide honors while still in the flesh.

In less than ten years after the organization of the parent society in New York branch societies have been formed in Boston, Philadelphia, Washington, Cincinnati, St. Louis, and San Francisco, aggregating a membership of nearly 5,000 — all enthusiastic to the point of fanaticism.

Within the same period the movement has become actively prominent in London, Paris and other European capitals.

Western disciples of this religion transplanted from the Orient have written books discussing it in a way that has challenged the attention of profound religious and scientific scholars.  In fact, the rapid headway made by this religion of marvels is fully as marvellous as any other feature of it.

(Theosophy is not a religion.)




Blavatsky

Whatever may be thought of the claims to serious consideration of modern Theosophy and its credulous adherents, the founder, organizer and inspirer of the movement is certainly a remarkable woman.

Mme. Blavatsky came to New York about ten years ago unheralded and unknown.  She was said to be a Russian Countess in her own right, the widow of a General whose services in the Russian army had won him fame and a place on the personal staff of the Czar.

In appearance, Mme. Blavatsky, though not at all handsome in the common acceptance of the term, was exceedingly impressive and interesting.  Tall and stoutly built, she carried herself with queenly dignity.

Her head is large, and under a broad, intellectual brow shone a pair of large, luminous blue eyes whose strange spiritual expression fascinated all who came within her influence.

Like Bulwer’s mysterious Zanoni, her age was uncertain.  She might have been under forty; with the physical vigor and elasticity of youth she possessed the mental maturity of age.

She had not been in New York long before she gathered about her a curiously mixed set of literary and artistic Bohemians, visionaries, cranks and an occasional practical thinker from Wall street or the colleges.




Blavatsky and the Spiritists

At that time Spiritualism was the rage in New York.  Flint’s teapot trick had not been exposed, Charles Foster was astonishing the town and Henry Kiddle was writing his book.  Looking upon Mme. Blavatsky as a valuable ally.

The Spiritualists at first welcomed her with open arms; but their joy was short-lived.  One evening, at the close of one of Flint’s seances during which the usual fol-de-rol manifestations of knocks and musical instruments played by unseen hands, writings, etc., had been gone through, a companion asked her opinion of it all.

She replied that it was all very wonderful, perhaps, but that if the company would accompany her to her rooms she would repeat the whole performance without turning down the gas.  Several of those present, including Colonel H. S. Olcott, who had gained much notoriety in Spiritualist circles by his defense of the Fox sisters, politely expressed incredulity.

“Come along and see,” said Madame. And they went.  Upon reaching her apartments in Thirty-seventh street, near Eighth avenue, sure enough Mme. Blavatsky repeated all Flint’s wonders with seeming ease, and in the full glare of gaslight.

The mediums and their followers never forgave her expose of their humbuggery.  She explicitly disavowed any belief in Spiritualism in the common sense or any claims to mediumistic powers.

“It is my own spirit and not the spirits of those who have gone from earth,” she declared, “that does these things.  Whatever powers I possess are simply the result of the complete power over my will that I have acquired.”

It was in these rooms, afterwards familiarly known as “The Lamasery” (the name given a Bhuddist convent in Thibet), that a brilliant crowd of Bohemians were wont to gather of an evening to drink tea from Madame’s samovar and indulge in “a feast of reason and a flow of soul.”




Blavatsky's great knowledge

The hostess proved herself a conversationalist of rare magnetic power, and no one ever tired of listening to her fascinating recital of experiences in many lands, her views on life and art, or her exposition of the occultism of the East.

She was an accomplished linguist, as most Russians are; and she not only spoke French, German, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Hindostanee and several Arabic dialects with east and fluency, but displayed a deep knowledge of the ancient and modern literature of all countries.

She was familiar with German and French philosophy, and commenting upon the work of the great thinkers expressed many ideas of striking force and originality.  Occasionally she entertained her guests with music, and her piano playing was pronounced emphatically that of a great musician.

Among those who were to be seen at these gatherings were Prof. Weiss, of the New York University; Thomas A. Edison, A. L. Rawson, the painter; Prof. Wilder, the genial and lamented Sam Ward, poet, philosopher, lobbyist and bon vivant; his chere ami, William Henry Huribert, then editor of The World; the Earl of Dunraven, whose father wrote a monumental book on Spiritualism, and who is now Lord Salisbury’s Under-Secretary for the Colonies; David A. Curtis, of the Herald; Edward P. Mitchell, then, as now, exploiting his brilliant imagination in the Sun’s columns; Albert Bierstadt, the artist; Charles Sotheran, mystic and bibliophile; Linda and Eda Diez, the actresses; A. M. Palmer, the manager; Edwin Booth, John Russell Young; William Stuart, then manager of the Old Park Theatre; Edward Donavan, the artist, and a host of other choice spirits, including on several occasions the Earl of Dufferin, whose present position as Viceroy of India affords him opportunities to continue his studies of Oriental religion in its ancient home, and Laurence Oliphant, whose social satires in Blackwood and whose scheme for the Jewish colonization of Palestine have given him a prominence distasteful to his native modesty.

At this time Mme. Blavatsky’s great life work, “Isis Unveiled,” was on the press, and many curious stories of her alleged remarkable powers are told.




Blavatsky could materialize money

One day Mr. J. W. Bouton, her publisher, called, and fancying from something that was said that the author was in need of money, delicately offered to advance a sum on the book.

“Money!” exclaimed Mme. Blavatsky, laughing; “I’m never troubled about money.  I toil not, neither do I spin for material needs, yet I am always provided.  Now I think of it, I have several little bills to pay.  Will you kindly see if there is any money in the top drawer of my writing-desk while I pour you some tea?”

Mr. Bouton opened the drawer indicated, which was in a desk at the other end of the room.  It was quiet empty.  He made sure of that and, closing the drawer, declared the fact.

“Ah,” said madame, nonchalantly, “I want $500.  Open the drawer again, if you please.”

Mr. Bouton did so, and started back amazed.  Where but an instant before was emptiness, five good, crisp hundred dollar bills met his astonished gaze.

“That is my Fortunatus purse,” explained the fair Russian, handing her visitor a cup of tea and receiving the money from his hands.  “Whenever I want money it is placed there conveniently and safely to my hands.”




Blavatsky materialized a portrait

A lady living in West Thirty-first street, possessed of a considerable fortune and well known in New York society, who spent much time with Mme. Blavatsky, in those days, and who is still active in the Theosophical organization, avers that she saw the seer produce instantly, by simply laying her hand on a sheet of paper, an excellent photograph of a relative of this lady whom madame had never seen and who was then in a distant city.




Her clairvoyance

Mr. Rawson, the artist above mentioned, aided Gen. Cesnola greatly in his explorations of Cyprus. His archaeological acquirements gained him the warm personal friendship of Pope Pius IX., and by special favor of the Pontiff he was allowed, under surveillance, to examine some books in the secret chambers of the Vatican Library absolutely forbidden to everybody but the Papal Secretary and members of the Sacred College of Cardinals.

Even these were not privileged to copy a line.  Yet Mr. Rawson affirmed that several pages of extracts from these secret books are given verbatim in “Isis Unveiled.”  Clairvoyance is the only explanation vouchsafed for the accomplishment of this seeming impossibility.




Blavatsky and Freemasonry

A like explanation is given of her thorough knowledge of Freemasonry.  She astonished thirty-third-degree Master Masons by her knowledge not only of all the ordinary grips, signs and passwords, but of the inner mysteries revealed only to the most advanced members of the craft.

An old Freemason once complimented her on this knowledge as a convincing test of her clairvoyant powers.

“It is not clairvoyance,” she rejoined earnestly.  “I am as genuine a Mason as you are.”

“But women are not admitted to the mysteries,” said the incredulous man.

“Not now,” rejoined the mysterious woman, “but they were formerly.”

“I must look up the matter,” said my friend humbly.

He did look it up and found that though it was an accepted tradition that priestesses of the Temple of the Sun in ancient Egypt were initiated into the Masonic order, there was no record of the admission of a woman within the sacred circle during the last 2,000 years.

As he was too gallant to utter a reflection on either the age or the veracity of the lady he did not mention the matter again.  Sam Ward, himself a Mason of high degree, frankly accepted the idea that, like Zanoni, madame was at least 3,000 years old and had discovered the secret of eternal youth.




Her astral projection

More than one of Mme. Blavatsky’s former associates in New York assert that the lady has repeatedly demonstrated her power of “projecting her astral body beyond the bounds of flesh,” as Prof. Coues claims to do.

Her appearances and disappearances were as sudden and mysterious as those of the weird adept, Ram Lal, in Marion Crawford’s story of “Mr. Isaacs.”  In fact, if all that is reported be true, this Theosophist priestess might well controvert Sir Boyle Roche’s famous aphorism that “a man cannot be in two places at once, barrin’ he was a bird.”  Mme. Blavatsky claimed to be able to be in two or more places at once when she so desired.

When she announced that she was about to go to India to spread the doctrines of Theosophy among the natives and foreigners there, a friend asked her why she did not utilize her supernatural powers by continuing to give the infant Theosophical Society of New York the aid of her presence and guidance, carrying out her mission in India at the same time.

To this she replied simply that she was commanded to leave New York and that she bowed to the superior wisdom of the adepts.




The Masters

These adepts, be it understood, are the highest order of Theosophists, who by long years of fasting, study and meditation had attained an advanced state of spiritual perfection.

These men dwell principally in the mountains of Thibet, far from contact with the world and mankind; sometimes in small communities, oftener as hermits in solitude.

Dwelling entirely away from railroads, telegraphs and newspapers, they are said to possess a direct knowledge of everything of moment that goes on in the world and to be able to communicate their thoughts or to convey their persons instantaneously to any quarter of the globe.




Astrology

Astrology is a favorite study of the Theosophists, and those who have devoted themselves sufficient to this “science” (popularly supposed to have been exploded centuries ago) are said to forecast individual destinies and events with marvellous exactness.




More information about Blavatsky and Theosophy

Far from being an ascetic, Mme. Blavatsky when here greatly enjoyed a good dinner washed down by good wine, and was much addicted to smoking Turkish cigarettes of a peculiar and excellent quality.

(Blavatsky did not drink alcohol.)

In the discussions at the “Lamasery” already alluded to, Mme. Blavatsky argued that Theosophy was but an extension of the theory of evolution taught by Spencer, Huxley and Darwin, beyond its mere material phase.

In universal evolution she held that man’s higher nature — the spiritual rather than the physical or intellectual — was developed.  Among the proven possibilities of this development she counted omniscience, omnipotence and omnipresence — the qualities generally attributed by the mass of mankind to the Deity it worships.

The principal means to these grand attainments, according to the Blavatsky theory, are a complete control of the will power and the acquisition of divine knowledge.

Theosophy (from the Greek Theos, God, and sophos, wise) means wise in the things of God.  Its mission is to teach man to control and use his will power for the higher advancement of humanity.

This, stripped of mystic symbolism, Oriental phraseology and abstruse metaphysical speculation, is the real essence and meaning of Theosophy.




Henry Olcott

Soon after Mme. Blavatsky’s departure, five years ago, she was followed by Col. H. S. Olcott, Hierophant and President of the New York society.

(Olcott did not succeed Blavatsky; he was elected president of the Theosophical Society from the beginning, while Blavatsky was elected its correspondent. And Olcott left with Blavatsky for India.)

The sensation their teachings produced will be remembered by newspaper readers of that day.

Much of the notoriety they then gained was due to the persistent efforts of the Rev. Joseph Cook, of Boston, who followed Olcott and Blavatsky from place to place endeavoring to carry on a controversy and valiantly abusing Buddhism and all its teachers.

Olcott is still in India, but Mme. Blavatsky is in Germany writing another book, which, as the result of her advanced development in the East, will probably cause even a greater sensation than “Isis Unveiled.”

General Abner Doubleday, who succeeded Olcott in the Presidency of the New York society, retired about two years ago, and William Q. Judge, a former law partner of Col. Olcott, took the helm.




William Judge

President Judge is a tall, handsome, blond-bearded, blue-eyed and eager enthusiast.  He speaks with ready and impressive eloquence, has travelled in the East and read much of the literature of Oriental religions.

But even Theosophists are human.  Personal jealousies arose, petty scandals were whispered about and under the first year or so of Mr. Judge’s regime there was a serious falling off both in the dignity and the membership of the society.

Its fortnightly meetings are held in an Odd-Fellows’ hall over a beer saloon at 35 Union square, amid strangely incongruous surroundings.

At a recent meeting Mr. Bjeregaard, the learned and amiable Librarian of the Astor Library, read a paper on Occultism to about a score of women and half a dozen men.

In the discussion which followed it was evident that the speaker had been very imperfectly understood.  An old outsider of cranky aspect got into a mathematical discussion with an impetuous young Chela in gold-bowed spectacles.

Another young man ruffled the President’s temper in a discussion of the comparative morality of monogamy and polygamy.

An enthusiastic woman of “uncertain” age poured forth a fearfully strange and complicated discourse on astrology, maintaining the floor against all contestants until shut off by a motion to adjourn.

In putting this motion the President adroitly got in some vague and glittering generalities about universal brotherhood, and the select gathering abandoned the warm and stuffy room for the fresher atmosphere of the square.












THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT DESCRIBED BY COUNTESS WACHTMEISTER



(The following address was given by Countess Constance Wachtmeister at the eighth Annual Convention of the American Theosophical Section in 1894.)



The Theosophical Movement of the 18th Century

The Theosophical Society was organized in the last century by Count St. Germain, Cagliostro and others. At that time there was a powerful Lodge in Paris, one also in Denmark, another in Germany, and three in Italy. But the revolution of ‘93 came and swept all away. And that is one reason why we now, in this century, have such a terrible Karma to work out.

(Cid's note: Blavatsky explained that Mesmer, Cagliostro and Saint Germain were the agents of the Trans-Himalayan Masters in the 18th century, and consequently they led the theosophical movement in the 18th century, although in that century it was not called "theosophical".)

That organization was the physical basis of the Society, which is really, in itself, an entity, formed by all the members who belong to it. The Theosophical Society has its seven Principles, and has to work through all of these. In the last century it worked through the physical basis, and now, in this century, it has had to work through Kama, or through the psychic state.

We are now, happily, I think, emerging from that state, and hereafter we may hope to enter upon a condition of very great activity.





Blavatsky

In 1851, in this century, Madame H. P. Blavatsky went to London with her father to take lessons in music, in which she manifested great talent.

One day, while walking in the street, she saw coming towards her some Indian Princes, and, amongst these, a very fine looking Indian – a man of seven feet high – and to her great surprise, recognized in this man one whom she had always looked upon as her guardian angel.

Ever since childhood she had seen him, and in moments of trial he had helped her. She had great love and affection for this person, and when she saw him in the physical form in London, she wanted to rush up to him and tell him how delighted she was to see him. But he made a sign to her to move on, and she went home and told her father, and all that night was unable to sleep, thinking of this strange thing – of how she had met her guardian angel.

The next day, she went to Hyde Park, and while there this man came again to her, and said it was true that he had watched her from childhood, because he saw in her a good instrument for the formation of this Society. He said it was on account, first of all, of her psychical power, for she had been a medium. Secondly, on account of her great intellectual and mental powers, and because of her partly Eastern and partly Western birth, as, he said, she would have to work in all countries.

Then he told her he had this work given to him to do by those above him, and that therefore he was most anxious that she should accept this position he offered her, which was to form this Society. He told her to go home to her father, consult with him, and then, if she would undertake this work, to return in three days to the Park and tell him. He pointed out to her that it would be a position of great trial, that she would be persecuted, and told her many things which would happen to the Society, and to herself.

She went home, consulted with her father, who said she might do as she pleased, and that if she chose to take up the work, he himself would give her money and help her; but she was to decide for herself. After three days’ cogitation, she decided to accept this position offered her, and she returned to the Park and told this to her Master.

He then said she must go to Egypt, and that there she would have to stop for some time to be taught, so that she might be enabled to teach others. Then she went to India, and was taken, hidden in a hay cart, through a country where no European is ever permitted to pass. She lay in the cart, covered with hay, and was conducted safely through that part of the country by Indians. At last she reached the place where the Masters live, was received by the sister of one of Them, and lived in the Master’s house for three years.

 But these three years were years of very great trial. In the first place, she was taught how to use her will. She had to do lessons just like a child; had to get up early and work hard and learn mental lessons. At the end of three years she was told to go to Egypt, and there was placed under the charge of another Master, who taught her about the Book of the Dead and many other works. After that she was put in charge of a Jewish Rabbi and taught the Kabbala.

When she had passed through all these, she was told she was ready, and should go to America, and I know people who have told me it was a standing joke against her when she came, because whenever she met anyone she would ask: “Do you know anybody by the name of Olcott?” “Do you know a man called Olcott?”

They would say, no, they had never heard of such a person. But at last some one said, Yes, they had heard that Col. Olcott was with the Eddy Brothers, studying Spiritualism, and if Madame Blavatsky would go there she could meet him.

An hour later she was on the train which conducted her to the Eddy homestead, and there met Col. Olcott. She was quickly able to prove to him that all the phenomena witnessed at the Homestead, she could produce by will-power. She was able to tell him beforehand just what she was going to do. She was also able to duplicate any particular kind of phenomenon produced by the Eddy Brothers in a state of unconsciousness and passiveness, by mere will-power and in full possession of her own consciousness.





The Theosophical Society

Some time passed, and then she, with Col. Olcott and William Q. Judge, formed the nucleus of the Society, and Col. Olcott consented to become its President. Some time afterwards they went to India, and there established the Society.
Such was the beginning of this grand movement. At first but two or three meeting together in a drawing-room; then growing larger and larger, until it is what you now see it – a huge Society, with branches all over the face of the earth – in every country of the world.

We have members belonging to all nationalities and to every religion of the world. And all these people call themselves brothers; and this Theosophical Society is one vast brotherhood extending all over the globe. And it is a brotherhood not only in name, but in reality; for I, who have travelled in so many countries, can tell you that wherever I go I am received as a sister. In India, among the Hindus, I have been received as a sister, taken into their homes (where they are not accustomed to take strangers or Europeans at any time), and I have not only been treated as a sister, but as a much-loved sister.

And now I come over here to the opposite end of the world, and all receive me kindly; and wherever I travel, I feel I am welcome. This is a beautiful thought – to think we have created in the world such a brotherhood as this. I will not insist that it is a real brotherhood, but it is a nucleus which, as time goes on, will, I hope, become a real brotherhood.


(This speech was printed in The Irish Theosophist , Dublin, June 15, 1894, p. 127-129)











WILLIAM JUDGE EXPLAINS WHAT IS THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT

 

 
 
THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
 
There is a very great difference between the Theosophical Movement and any Theosophical Society.
 
The Movement is moral, ethical, spiritual, universal, invisible save in effect, and continuous. A Society formed for theosophical work is a visible organization, an effect, a machine for conserving energy and putting it to use; it is not nor can it be universal, nor is it continuous.
 
Organized Theosophical bodies are made by men for their better cooperation, but, being mere outer shells, they must change from time to time as human defects come out, as the times change, and as the great underlying spiritual movement compels such alterations.
 
The Theosophical Movement being continuous, it is to be found in all times and in all nations. Wherever thought has struggled to be free, wherever spiritual ideas, as opposed to forms and dogmatism, have been promulgated, there the great movement is to be discerned.
 
Jacob Boehme’s work was a part of it, and so also was the Theosophical Society of over one hundred years ago*; Luther’s reformation must be reckoned as a portion of it; and the great struggle between Science and Religion, clearly portrayed by Draper, was every bit as much a motion of the Theosophical Movement as is the present Society of that name – indeed that struggle, and the freedom thereby gained for science, were really as important in the advance of the world, as are our different organizations.
 
And among political examples of the movement is to be counted the Independence of the American colonies, ending in the formation of a great nation, theoretically based on Brotherhood.
 
One can therefore see that to worship an organization, even though it be the beloved theosophical one, is to fall down before Form, and to become the slave once more of that dogmatism which our portion of the Theosophical Movement, the Theosophical Society, was meant to overthrow.
 
Some members have worshipped the so-called “Theosophical Society”, thinking it to be all in all, and not properly perceiving its de facto and piecemeal character as an organization nor that it was likely that this devotion to mere form would lead to a nullification of Brotherhood at the first strain.
 
And this latter, indeed, did occur with several members. They even forgot, and still forget, that H. P. Blavatsky herself declared that it were better to do away with the Society rather than to destroy Brotherhood, and that she herself declared the European part of it free and independent. These worshippers think that there must be a continuance of the old form in order for the Society to have an international character.
 
But the real unity and prevalence, and the real internationalism, do not consist in having a single organization. They are found in the similarity of aim, of aspiration, of purpose, of teaching, of ethics. Freemasonry – a great and important part of the true Theosophical Movement – is universally international; and yet its organizations are numerous, autonomous, sovereign, independent
 
 The Grand Lodge of the state of New York, including its different Lodges, is independent of all others in any state, yet every member is a Mason and all are working on a single plan. Freemasons over all the world belong to the great International Masonic Body, yet they have everywhere their free and independent government.
 
 
When the Theosophical Society was young and small, it was necessary that it should have but one government for the whole of it. But now that it has grown wide and strong, having spread among nations so different from each other as the American, the English, the Spanish, the Swedish and others in Europe, and the Hindu, it is essential that a change in the outward form be made.
 
This is that it becomes like the Freemasons – independent in government wherever the geographical or national conditions indicate that necessity. And that this will be done in time, no matter what certain persons may say to the contrary, there is not the slightest doubt.
 
The American Group, being by geographical and other conditions outwardly separate, began the change so as to be in government free and independent, but in basis, aspiration, aim and work united with all true Theosophists.
 
We have not changed the work of H.P.B.; we have enlarged it. We assert that any person who has been admitted to any Theosophical Society should be received everywhere among Theosophists, just as Masons are received among Masons.
 
It is untheosophical to denounce the change made by the American Group; it is not Theosophy nor conducive to its spread to make legal claims to theosophical names, symbols and seals so as to prevent if possible others from using them. Everyone should be invited to use our theosophical property as freely as he wishes.
 
Those who desire to keep up H.P.B.’s war against dogmatism will applaud and encourage the American movement because their liberated minds permit; but those who do not know true Theosophy, nor see the difference between forms and the soul of things, will continue to worship Form and to sacrifice Brotherhood to a shell.
 
 
 
 
Note
 
* “The Theosophical Society of over one hundred years ago”. This is a reference to the theosophical movement of seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, since the present article was written in 1895.
 
This article was later compiled in William Q. Judge's “Theosophical Articles,” published by the Theosophy Company of Los Angeles in 1980, vol. II, p.124-126.
 
 
 
 
 
OBSERVATION
 
I agree with what William Judge wrote, but to avoid confusion I prefer to say that the theosophical movement (that is, the efforts made to spread theosophical teachings) is incorporated within a larger movement which is the movement for the progress of humanity (and that is what William Judge calls “The Theosophical Movement”).