Notice: I have written in other languages, many interesting articles that you
can read translated in English in this
link.

Showing posts with label Evil - Devil - Hell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evil - Devil - Hell. Show all posts

ENTITIES THAT OWN PERSONS MENTIONED BY NICHOLAS ROERICH

 
(This is chapter 6 of the Nicholas Roerich's book Shambhala.)
 
 
 
OBSESSION
 
-        “I still cannot believe what you tell me about obsessions. They may be simply a reflection of the subconscious mind. For do we not all hear and read and see all kinds of things during our lifetime? Then we forget them; but the fissures of our brain somehow retain these facts and then later, unexpectedly disclose them. Then they seem entirely foreign to us.”
 
Thus spoke a friend in Urga to me. He, being an official, regards skepticism as the supreme mark of dignity.
 
One must never insist, nor even try to convince. Often, it is only necessary to draw another’s attention to a slight incident, and at this sign of the semaphor, the entire trend of life may change its course. Hence, without insistence, our friend was informed of a few other events, which had obsession as their underlying theme. He was told about the Tibetan “Rollang”—the resurrection of the dead. But of course the skeptic only shrugged his shoulders; he disdained to speak of it.
 
We told him of an incident in the United States, where a person of high intelligence maintained that her deceased bridegroom had taken possession of her and was controlling her entire life, offering advice and giving her orders. In fact, her obsessor demonstrated such distinction from her own consciousness, that he caused her not only spiritual indisposition but even physical pain.
 
Our skeptic answered that such “obsessed” people could probably be found by the scores in our lunatic asylums and that in the practise of the law, such incidents of irresponsible consciousness were well known. However, this did not convince him in the least. We then told him how, according to the Chinese, the Tao-tai of Khotan had become obsessed by the Thai whom he himself had killed. And how the Chinese now point out that the murderer has adopted certain characteristic habits of the dead man and that even the face of the murderer has changed most characteristically within a short time.
 
The skeptic again only shrugged his shoulders.
 
 
Several days passed. Then one evening our skeptic came to visit us, looking somewhat strange. Apparently something perplexed him and he seemed to search for an opportunity to blurt it out. Finally he exclaimed:
 
-        “One listens to your tales—and then all kinds of strange things begin to happen. After the last conversation we had concerning the ‘obsessed’ people, as you call them, I dropped in to the Chinese photographer. He is married to a very simple Buryat woman, quite illiterate. I’ve known them for a long time. I noticed that the Chinese was somewhat sad, quite changed, so I asked him if he was ill.
 
‘No,’ he answered me. ‘I’m all right—but it’s my wife. It’s bad. I don’t know how to cure her. Recently she began to talk of the strangest things! She says that some one has taken possession of her—not one person but two simultaneously. God knows where she gets the strange words from. It seems that one of them was drowned. The other died from over-drink. I know that things like that happen, because we used to have many cases like that at home in China.
 
I asked him to call his wife. In she came. She always was small and slight, but now she looked far thinner. You know, she is quite a simple Buryat woman, entirely illiterate. When she entered, her husband left the room.
 
I asked her, ‘Won’t you have tea with me, too?’
 
‘No,’ she answered, ‘he forbids me to drink tea with you because you do not believe and you wish me harm.’
 
‘Who forbids you?’ I asked her.
 
‘Oh, it’s always he—the German.’
 
‘What German? Tell me where he comes from.’ I asked her.
 
‘Well,’ she continued, ‘one is Adolph; the other is Felix. They are in me for three weeks already!’
 
‘And where are they from?’, I asked.
 
‘Some time ago,’ she began, ‘a man came to see my husband, to have his picture taken. He was a fat German —maybe you have seen him in the street; he has some kind of business. These two were with him. He went away, but the two remained and they became tied up to me. One of them, Adolph, became a coolie after the war in Vladivostok. He was drowned when he went out boating. They had a fight. The other, Felix, is also a German, and he is always drunk and swears terribly!’
 
And so she continued to tell me what they made her do, how they compelled her to eat much meat, especially uncooked, because they liked it with blood. They also suggested to her to drink wine because they liked it very much. One of them, the drunkard, continuously whispers to her to hang herself or to cut her throat and that then they could help her to accomplish anything.
 
The Buryat woman told me the kind of things the men tell her. They seem to have traveled a great deal on ship, especially one of them. He must have been a sailor. Why, think of it, she gave me the names and descriptions of towns of which she couldn’t have had the slightest notion. Then she spoke of ships, and used such technical terms that only a person completely at home on sailing craft would know them. Many of the terms she was unable to explain, when I questioned her further, but she insisted she heard them from the men.
 
I must confess that I left the Chinaman rather puzzled. This is the first time I ever heard such things with my own ears, and it all correlates with the things you have been telling me.
 
 
I must confess I had an insatiable desire to go and see the people again, so I went today for the second time. When I asked the Chinese about his wife, he just waved his hands in despair and said that things had become worse. As I asked him whether I could see his wife again, she herself entered the room.
 
‘I cannot stay here with you,’ she said to me. ‘They forbid me; they say you want to harm me. They want me to be happy and you can spoil it all. Because you know some people who can drive them away.’
 
Then she left the room and her husband, waving his hands once again, muttered, ‘Bad, very bad indeed. Our home will be destroyed.’
 
 
You see, I am a man of the law and I therefore like everything to be authentic. I confess that I did not believe the tales you told me last time, because nothing like it had ever occurred previously in my life. But since I have heard and have seen this thing myself, I can no longer doubt it, because I have known the woman for a long time and she now impresses me quite differently.
 
She does not just talk, or talk nonsense as happens in cases of paralysis or pathological cases such as I have often had in my practise. No, in this case I can clearly see something foreign, not her own, with a decided and characteristic psychology. For when she repeats the sentences told to her by the sailor, one can distinctly feel the speech of a seaman, and a seaman of recent, prewar days. Thus also in the speech of the other man, the drunkard; it is precisely that of one of the derelicts whom the war cast into the far-off lands of Siberia.
 
‘By the way,’ suddenly the confused skeptic asked, ‘how does one proceed to drive away such obsessions? Because, when she hinted at people I know, I felt at once that she spoke of you’.”
 
 
I laughingly remarked to the skeptic that it appeared as though we had changed roles, and that he would probably laugh if I told him that in such cases of obsession one puts pieces of bloody raw meat on the table and then pours strong-smelling intoxicants all around the room. Then every one must leave the house and the person obsessed must never return to it again. Of course, other methods may be used.
 
This reminded me of a curious episode which happened in America, when I had a serious disagreement with the spirits. I was asked to view some paintings which were alleged to have been done by an obsessed woman. Up to that time, the woman knew nothing about art and had never touched a brush. I saw a series of strange paintings, obviously painted in various technics and by different hands.
 
On one and the same canvas, one could see the characteristic technic of a French impressionist, and besides it an equally clear Japanese technic. Here also were Egyptian temples with a decidedly German romantic turn.
 
Thereupon, I remarked to the artist that it seemed peculiar to me that such varied styles should be painted together and on one canvas without any coordination whatsoever. But the artist stated that the painting had been done thus not accidentally, because the spirits who guided her were indeed of various nationalities. Thereupon I observed that this technical medley did not contribute to a completeness of painting. Upon this the artist reflected for a long time and then said sharply:
 
-        “They find it very good so!”
 
I continued to persist in my opinion and the spirits in a very brusk and rough manner persisted in their own wish that the painting remain as it was. Thus proceeded a quarrel with the spirits which continued with some vigor…
 
-        “I do not know anything of your American incident,” interrupted the skeptic. “But after all I have seen and heard, I now consider it entirely possible. But I would not like to leave the Buryat woman in her present situation. I think that I ought to go there again and try to take some measures.”
 
I attempted to explain to the skeptic that with his complete ignorance of the subject he would only bring harm to the woman, and that he might easily cause her to commit suicide or take other extreme measures. Finally we exchanged roles completely. I tried to dissuade my friend from all further visits to the Chinese, while he, like a drunkard who smells wine, began ingeniously to invent all kinds of excuses to continue this adventure...
 
It was strange to see how the old lawyer, recently so staid, was trying to find every invention decently possible to justify himself and to show his need of continuing his visits to the Chinese. Naturally, he did not overlook poor science: he had to continue his excursions in the name of science! And again, it was in the name of science that humanity had to be warned. But behind all these important considerations, there was clearly revealed an instinct suddenly aroused to the knowledge of invisible worlds.
 
 
The wife of the skeptic, who was also present and who had previously upheld me, now insisted by every measure that I should dissuade her husband from his excursion, for during the last days he had been talking only about the Buryat woman and the Germans. Finally the recent skeptic gave his promise to drop the matter, after I assured him that if he would but look around him, he would see many far more significant things.
 
On leaving, he suddenly suggested to me that I accompany him just once to a Mongolian witch:
 
-        ”You know, it is the same woman who foretold to Ungarn the day of his death and all his immediate future, which was exactly fulfilled. She lives near here now.”
 
I declined to visit the sorceress but I wonder whether the skeptic did not go to see her himself!
 
 
 
 
Second case
 
As always happens, an unusual conversation does not cease at once. Hardly had the skeptic left our house, when two other visitors came. One of them, a local Mongol, was highly educated and had lived abroad. The other, an ex-officer, had served throughout the war. The conversation began with some entirely unrelated matters The Mongol was telling of the natural wealth of Mongolia, where mineral oil flows in streams through the desert and where the rivers carry inexhaustible gold. Then describing the gold districts, he added in the same calm narrative tone, “And those murdered Chinamen allowed us no sleep all the time we were staying at the mines.”
 
-        “But how could the dead disturb your sleep?”
 
-        “Those were the dead Chinamen who were killed during the riots, after the war and the revolution.”
 
-        “But look here, how could people, killed long since, prevent you from sleeping?”
 
-        “Exactly by walking around, talking, knocking the ashes out of their pipes and rattling the crockery.”
 
-        “You are certainly joking.”
 
-        “No,” was the serious reply. “We could not see them but all through the night we could hear them. A lot of them had been killed there and, as people say, they were killed unawares. They went to bed quite calmly that night, not suspecting an attack. It is always so; people who are unexpectedly killed cannot give up their daily habits. The Chinese are especially like that. They love their ground and their houses. And when people are attached to their earthly possessions, it is always difficult for them to leave them behind.”
 
So seriously spoke the Mongol.
 
The officer who had thus far been silent, then added, “Yes, with the Chinese this often happens. In Mukden there is an old house in which no one wants to live. A Chinaman was killed there and he gives no one any peace. Each night he screams out as if he was being killed again. We wanted to verify this rumor once, and we went there and stopped overnight. But about one o’clock we noticed a bright blue sphere descending from the top floor along the railing of the staircase. That was enough for us, I admit, and we packed off.
 
-        “But now I remember another case that happened during the war near the Prussian border. The whole staff had stopped over night in a small hut. At midnight we all suddenly awoke together, each one shouting something about horses. One man shouted, ‘Who brought the horses in here!’ Another roared, ‘Look at the horses running away!’ I also awoke and in the darkness near me, I saw some horses pass me by in a flash neighing as though in fright. The guards stationed outside had heard nothing. But in the morning we discovered that our drove of horses had been blown up by a shell.”
 
The Mongol became lively thereupon and confirmed this:
 
-        “I also have heard about invisible animals. It was in the Yurta of our Shaman-sorcerer. The Shaman invoked the lower elementary powers and we all could hear the galloping and neighing of whole droves of horses; we could hear the flight of entire flocks of eagles and the hissing of innumerable snakes right inside the yurta . . . you should speak to our minister of war. He is a fortune teller and he could tell you numberless unsuspected things.”
 
-        “But why do you think they are unsuspected?”
 
-        “Well, I have become accustomed to think that all foreigners regard our customary occurrences as most strange…”
 
Ulan Bator Khoto, 1927.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OBSERVATION
 
In esotericism it is well known that people can be possessed to a greater or lesser extent (what Nicolás Roerich calls 'obsessed') by different beings, mainly by astral entities or by deceased humans.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

HELL EXPLAINED BY WILLIAM JUDGE





Theosophy teaches that the main hell is lived on the physical plane, because it is during the incarnation that humans have to deal with the negative karma that they have generated, and that is why you see so much suffering on Earth.

And about this subject, William Judge mentioned the following:


« The Oriental doctrine of reward and punishment of the human Ego is very different from the theological scheme accepted throughout Christendom, since the Brahmans and Buddhists fix the place of punishment and compensation upon this earth of ours, while the Christian removes the “bar of God” to the hereafter.

We may not profitably stop to argue upon logic with the latter; it will be sufficient to quote to them the words of Jesus, St. Matthew, and the Psalmist. “With what measure ye mete, it shall be measured unto you again,” said Jesus [Matt 7:2]; and Matthew declares that for every word, act, and thought we shall have to answer, while David, the royal poet, sang that those who serve the Lord should never eat beggar’s bread.

We all know well that the first two declarations do away with the vicarious atonement; and as for the Jewish singer’s notion, it is negatived every day in any city of either hemisphere.

Among the Ceylonese Buddhists the name of the doctrine is Kamma; with the Hindus it is Karma. Viewed in its religious light, it “is the good and bad deeds of sentient beings, by the infallible influence or efficacy of which those beings are met with due rewards or punishment, according as they deserve, in any state of being.”

When a being dies, he emits, as it were, a mass of force or energy, which goes to make up the new personality when he shall be reincarnated. In this energy is found the summation of the life just given up, and by means of it the Ego is forced to assume that sort of body among those appropriate circumstances which together are the means for carrying out the decrees of Karma.

Hence hell is not a mythical place or condition after death in some unknown region specially set apart by the Almighty for the punishment of his children, but is in very truth our own globe, for it is on the earth, in earth-lives experienced in human bodies, that we are punished for bad deeds previously done, and meet with happiness and pleasure as rewards for old merit.

When one sees, as is so common, a good man suffering much in his life, the question naturally arises, “Has Karma anything to do with it, and is it just that such a person should be so afflicted?”

For those who believe in Karma it is quite just, because this man in a previous life must have done such acts as deserve punishment now.

(Note: It is usually due to that, but also the suffering may be due to the fact that the person is a victim of the circumstances, and then in her next life, she will be compensated.)

And, similarly, the wicked man who is free from suffering, happy and prosperous, is so because in a previous existence he had been badly treated by his fellows or had experienced much suffering. And the perfect justice of Karma is well illustrated in his case because, although now favored by fortune, he, being wicked, is generating causes which, when he shall be reborn, will operate then to punish him for his evil-doing now.


Some may suppose that the Ego should be punished after death, but such a conclusion is not logical. For evil deeds committed here on the objective plane could not with any scientific or moral propriety be punished on a plane which is purely subjective. And such is the reason why so many minds, both of the young and old have rejected and rebelled against the doctrine of a hell-fire in which they would be eternally punished for commission of sin on earth.

Even when unable to formulate the reason in metaphysical terms, they instinctively knew that it would be impossible to remove the scene of compensation from the very place where the sin and confusion had been done and created. When the disciples of Jesus asked him if the man who was born blind was thus brought into the world for some sin he had committed, they had in mind this doctrine of Karma, just as all the Hindus and Buddhists have when they see some of their fellows crippled or deformed or deprived of sight.

The theory above hinted at of the person at death throwing out from himself the new personality, so to speak, ready to await the time when the Ego should return to earth seeking a new body, is a general law that operates in a great many other instances besides the birth or death of a being. It is that which is used by the Theosophists to explain the relations between the moon and the earth»
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.33)





We see that the physical plane is the place for action, while heaven is the place for rest (even for people who were bad).

The exception to this rule are those individuals who were so extremely bad, that they will not have a period of rest and happiness after death, but they will experience a terrible period of suffering and torment.

And this is the hell that religions talk about, and it is located in the lowest area of purgatory. But Theosophy explains that it is not eternal, but temporary (like the stay in heaven), and then the humans reincarnate again.






And that is why, when people asked William Judge:

Does Theosophy teach that this earth is the hell of this planetary system?  And, if so, does each solar system have its own hell?


William Judge replied:


« Very many writers affirm it to be their opinion that the real hell is this earth, but it is not clear that such is the view “of Theosophy,” meaning thereby the exact truth. It was taught, apparently, by Buddha that there is a hell after death of the body, and some of the conditions of Kama-Loka are a hell most surely; it is also taught in Hinduism that there is a hell apart from earth-life.

Some Kabbalists seem to lean to the view that earth is hell, and when we consider the troubles of the soul therein it would appear to be so. For what could be more dreadful than to be living on the earth with a full knowl edge that your acts will lead to a worse state after death and may finally blot out the soul?

But in my opinion the question of hell, like that of heaven, is to be decided on a consideration of a man as a thinker who thinks always and who is because he is a thinker. Hence his life at any time or place must be the result of his thoughts, must be founded on his thoughts, and have its color and effect from his thoughts.

So if after the death of the body his thoughts before that naturally lead to the weaving of a beautiful, heavenly web, he will reside in those thoughts until they are exhausted, and then coming back to earth again his only hell will be this life.

But if, enjoying himself or not here, he indulges in those thoughts that inevitably lead to the bitterness of a black life in Kāma-Loka, then his hell must be a stage or condition of that state of the very worst description, to which earth-life is heaven in comparison; in his case the return to life here would be heaven and the other life hell.

(Note: Master Kuthumi explained that very few humans get this suffering experience after death, because the person really had to be extremely malevolent in order not to have even a short period of rest and happiness during his post-mortem stay before returning to reincarnate.)

This leads me to the conclusion that the very lowest and worst hell must be a condition of the mind, and that it must have place out of a body and hence be a stage or degree of Kāma-Loka.

This would explain the various statements as to hells, because the awful condition that some souls must be in after the limitations of the body are shaken off, would be of just the sort described, and their particular locus should be in the vicinity of the earth, as that is the representative of the grossest form of matter.

If the law of analogy is to rule, then other worlds must have their own hells of this sort; but the solar system seems to be quite a large enough subject for us to be content with for the present.

But it seems to me that all the theories of hell, no matter of what awful variety, are founded on the life of the mind and the soul, and to be drawn from descriptions of that life according to natural results.

A dream of oppressive character will give some idea of what a hell may be, for there the mind devoid of body is suffering that which the body afterwards knows to be wholly of thought»
(Echoes of the Orient II, p.363-4)










THE DWELLER OF THE THRESHOLD DESCRIBED BY BLAVATSKY




Blavatky explained (as I detailed in the following chapter) that when a human sinks very deeply into degradation or evil, he ends up separating himself from his superior triad and becomes a person without a soul.

And this heartless human will continue to incarnate becoming with each new incarnation an increasingly abject entity, until finally the life force in he is exhausted, and then he will end up disintegrating.

But Blavatsky also pointed out that sometimes those heartless humans are transformed into what the occultists call a "Dweller of the Threshold", and below I will transcribe what she said about this matter.


« In rarer cases, however, something far more dreadful may happen. When the lower Manas is doomed to exhaust itself by starvation; when there is no longer hope that even a remnant of a lower light will, owing to favorable conditions––say, even a short period of spiritual aspiration and repentance––attract back to itself its Parent Ego, then Karma leads the Higher Ego back to new incarnations. In this case the Kâma-Mânasic spook may become that which we call in Occultism the “Dweller on the Threshold.”

This “Dweller” is not like that which is described so graphically in Zanoni, but an actual fact in nature and not a fiction in romance, however beautiful the latter may be. Bulwer must have got the idea from some Eastern Initiate. Our “Dweller,” led by affinity and attraction, forces itself into the astral current, and through the Auric Envelope of the new tabernacle inhabited by the Parent Ego, and declares war to the lower light which has replaced it.

This, of course, can only happen in the case of the moral weakness of the personality so obsessed. No one strong in his virtue, and righteous in his walk of life, can risk or dread any such thing; but only those depraved in heart. Robert Louis Stevenson had a glimpse of a true vision indeed when he wrote his Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. His story is a true allegory. Every Chela would recognize in it a substratum of truth, and in Mr. Hyde a “Dweller,” an obsessor of the personality, the tabernacle of the “Parent Spirit.”

“This is a nightmare tale!” I was often told by one, now no more in our ranks, a person who had a most pronounced “Dweller,” a “Mr. Hyde,” as an almost constant companion. “How can such a process take place without one’s knowledge?”

It can and does so happen, and I have almost described it once before in The Theosophist. “The Soul, the Lower Mind, becomes as a half animal principle almost paralyzed with daily vice, and grows gradually unconscious of its subjective half, the Lord, . . . one of the mighty Host”; and “in proportion to the rapid sensuous development of the brain and nerves, sooner or later, it (the personal Soul) finally loses sight of its divine mission on earth.”

Truly, “like the vampire, the brain feeds and lives and grows in strength at the expense of its spiritual parent . . . and the personal half-unconscious Soul becomes senseless, beyond hope of redemption. It is powerless to discern the voice of its ‘God.’ It aims but at the development and fuller comprehension of natural, earthly life; and thus can discover but the mysteries of physical nature. . . . It begins by becoming virtually dead, during the life of the body; and ends by dying completely––that is, by being annihilated as a complete immortal Soul.

Such a catastrophe may often happen long years before one’s physical death: ‘We elbow soulless men and women at every step in life.’ And, when death arrives . . . there is no more a Soul (the reincarnating Spiritual Ego) to liberate, . . . for it has fled years before.”

Result: Bereft of its guiding principles, but strengthened by the material elements, Kama-Manas, from being a “derived light,” now becomes an independent Entity. After suffering itself to sink lower and lower on the animal plane, when the hour strikes for its earthly body to die, one of two things happens: either Kama-Manas is immediately reborn in Myalba (the state of Avichi on earth), or, if it become too strong in evil––“immortal in Satan” is the Occult expression––it is sometimes allowed, for Karmic purposes, to remain in an active state of Avichi in the terrestrial Aura.

Then through despair and loss of all hope it becomes like the mythical “devil” in its endless wickedness; it continues in its elements, imbued through and through with the essence of matter; for evil is coëval with matter rent asunder from spirit. And when its higher Ego has once more reincarnated, evolving a new reflection, or Kama-Manas, the doomed Lower Ego, like a Frankenstein’s monster, will ever feel attracted to its “Father,” who repudiates his Son, and will become a regular “Dweller” on the “threshold” of terrestrial life»
(CW 12, p.637)










THE EVIL EXPLAINED BY MASTER KUTHUMI




In this article, I will transcribe what Master Kuthumi wrote about evil in the book The Mahatmas Letters.



WHAT IS EVIL?

Master Kuthumi replied:

« Evil has no existence per se and is but the absence of good and exists but for him who is made its victim. It proceeds from two causes, and no more than good is it an independent cause in Nature.

Nature is destitute of goodness or malice; she follows only immutable laws when she either gives life and joy, or sends suffering and death, and destroys what she has created.

Nature has an antidote for every poison and her laws a reward for every suffering. The butterfly devoured by a bird becomes that bird, and the little bird killed by an animal goes into a higher form. It is the blind law of necessity and the eternal fitness of things, and hence cannot be called Evil in Nature.

The real evil proceeds from human intelligence and its origin rests entirely with reasoning man who dissociates himself from Nature. Humanity then alone is the true source of evil.

Evil is the exaggeration of good, the progeny of human selfishness and greediness. Think profoundly and you will find that save death — which is no evil but a necessary law, and accidents which will always find their reward in a future life — the origin of every evil whether small or great is in human action, in man whose intelligence makes him the one free agent in Nature.

It is not nature that creates diseases, but man. The latter's mission and destiny in the economy of nature is to die his natural death brought by old age. Save accident, neither a savage nor a wild (free) animal die of disease.

Food, sexual relations, drink, are all natural necessities of life; yet excess in them brings on disease, misery, suffering, mental and physical, and the latter are transmitted as the greatest evils to future generations, the progeny of the culprits.

Ambition, the desire of securing happiness and comfort for those we love, by obtaining honours and riches, are praiseworthy natural feelings but when they transform man into an ambitious cruel tyrant, a miser, a selfish egotist they bring untold misery on those around him, on nations as well as on individuals.

All this then — food, wealth, ambition, and a thousand other things we have to leave unmentioned — becomes the source and cause of evil whether in its abundance or through its absence. Become a glutton, a debauchee, a tyrant, and you become the originator of diseases, of human suffering and misery. Lack all this and you starve, you are despised as a nobody and the majority of the herd, your fellow men, make of you a sufferer your whole life.

Therefore it is neither nature nor an imaginary Deity that has to be blamed, but human nature made vile by selfishness. »
(ML 10, p.56-57)


This affirmation that evil does not exist by itself, but is created by men themselves, I have also found in other high teachings. For example, in the book Talking with Angel by Gitta Mallasz, the angels explained that evil is nothing other than energy that is not in its correct place.

And Master Pasteur also explained that all the calamities that hurt humanity are a consequence of the bad vibrations generated by humans themselves, but the day when people will learn to live in harmony, then Earth will become a planetary paradise.






EVIL IN THE COSMOS

Master Kuthumi wrote:

« And now to your extraordinary hypothesis that Evil with its attendant train of sin and suffering is not the result of men, but may be perchance the wise scheme of the moral Governor of the Universe.

Conceivable as the idea may seem to you trained in the pernicious fallacy of the Christian — "the ways of the Lord are inscrutable" — it is utterly inconceivable for me. Must I repeat again that the best Adepts have searched the Universe during milleniums and found nowhere the slightest trace of such a Machiavellian schemer — but throughout, the same immutable, inexorable law.

You must excuse me therefore if I positively decline to lose my time over such childish speculations. »
(ML 22, p.142-143)


Esotericism explains that there are hierarchies of dark beings, but these are not "the enemies of God" as is promulgated by Christianity and other similar religions, because these dark beings were also created by God and have a role to play within the creation.






EVIL ON THE PLANET EARTH

At cosmic level, evil not exist as an independent malevolent force, but this independent malevolent force exist on Earth created by men themselves, and on this matter, Master Kuthumi wrote the following:

« Morya thinks that for your purposes I better give you a few more details upon Atlantis since it is greatly connected with evil if not with its origin. »
(ML 23B, p.156)

Although, it is known that inexorably several humans will transform into black magicians throughout the evolution of humanity, in the case of Earth, the events that happened during Atlantis were those that generated the most powerful black magicians who they have emerged on our planet.

But even though black magicians generate much evil, the Transhimalayan Masters cannot prevent that evil because they must respect the free will available to humans (including that of black magicians).

And that is why Master Morya wrote:

« [We cannot counteract the work of the black magicians] who are on earth whose evil results we try to palliate but whose work we have no right to meddle with so long as they do not cross our path. »
(ML 134, p.463)

And the evil generated by black magicians make also humans evolve, and that is why Master Kuthumi said:

« The world moves and lives under the shadow of the deadly upas-tree of Evil; yet its dripping is dangerous to, and can reach only those whose higher and middle natures are as much susceptible of infection as their lower one. Its venomous seed can germinate but in a willing, well prepared soil. »
(ML 64, p.359)

« However, we will go on in that periodical work of ours; we will not allow ourselves to be baffled in our philanthropic attempts until that day when the foundations of a new continent of thought are so firmly built that no amount of opposition and ignorant malice guided by the Brethren of the Shadow will be found to prevail. »
(ML 9, p.51)






EVIL IN MAN

Master Kuthumi said:

« Viewed from our standpoint the evil is far greater on the spiritual than on the material side of man. »
(ML 11, p.64)

« The potency for evil is as great in man — aye greater — than the potentiality for good. »
(ML 20C, p.130)

And that is why before wanting to walk the initiatory path, the disciple first has to completely eliminate all germs of evil that may be inside him.

And it is the reason that Master Kuthumi replied to Mr. Sinnett:

« You were told, however, that the path to Occult Sciences has to be trodden laboriously and crossed at the danger of life; that every new step in it leading to the final goal, is surrounded by pit-falls and cruel thorns; that the pilgrim who ventures upon it is made first to confront and conquer the thousand and one furies who keep watch over its adamantine gates and entrance — furies called Doubt, Skepticism, Scorn, Ridicule, Envy and finally Temptation — especially the latter; and that he, who would see beyond had to first destroy this living wall; that he must be possessed of a heart and soul clad in steel, and of an iron, never failing determination and yet be meek and gentle, humble and have shut out from his heart every human passion, that leads to evil.

Are you all this?

Have you ever begun a course of training which would lead to it? »
(ML 62, p.352)






HOW TO EVALUATE THE EVIL?

Master Kuthumi indicated that a higher level of consciousness is needed to be able to measure evil correctly:

« Good and evil are not to be measured by events on the lower or physical plane. »
(ML 68, p.372)

And this is because we do not have the ability to know when damage is caused by karmic reasons and when it is caused by the evil of others.






HOW TO RESPOND TO EVIL?

Master Kuthumi mentioned:

« And that, though we may not say with the Christians, "Return good for evil" — we repeat with Confucius — "Return good for good; for evil — justice." »
(ML 85, p.401)