Notice: I have written in other languages, many interesting articles that you
can read translated in English in this
link.

LEADBEATER IS PRINCIPE OF CHARLATANS




The Australian newspaper Truth of Sydney published on June 4, 1922, on page 6, an article stating that Charles Leadbeater was a trickster and recounted Annie Besant's fanatic defense of Leadbeater in Sydney.








A PRINCE OF CHARLATANS

THE SINGULAR AND SLIMY LEADBEATER
MRS. BESANT DEPARTS; BUT LEAVES HIM HERE

Further Information About This Precious Pair



Annie Besant went to Australia to defend Charles Leadbeater

Mrs. Besant was booked to leave for London last Thursday, after a short stay in this City, marked by a tumultuous storm of protest on account of her past and recent association with the pseudo "Bishop" Leadbeater.

The row was commenced by leading members of the local Theosophical Society, who would have nore of yhe "Bishop" cupers within the Theosophical fold, and were determined that he would not drag in that spurious organisation of freakish emulation,  'The Liberal Catholic Church.'

(Cid note: it is a fake church that Leadbeater and Wedgwood developed so they could pretend to be bishops and satisfy their pedophilic desires.)

Neither as the mouth-piece and defender (in frequently needed in the past of her affectionate hirsute pal [Leadbeater], or in defence of her suspicious championing of him did Annie utter one word of rebuttal.

In the face of this, and the serious charges levelled at Leadbcater, it is curious to note that Mrs. Besant was farewelled at a gathering of citizens in the chief civic hall. Even though those present could not be classed as thoroughly representative of the citizens, they included several members of the learned professions, content to figure publicly with an old woman who has constantly dabbled in the black arts of the East.

Mrs. Besant, in her meandering among Spiritualists, Theosophists, Atheists, Buddhists. Hindus, and a host of other bodies, ending in "ists", has cleverly; got into touch with wealthy cranks.

She has written proliflcally, and her weird ebullitions have had a ready sale, especially the treatises on contraception. These enjoyed a large circulation. Bradlaugh and she are alleged to have received, directly and indirectly, about £15,000 as the result of their publishing the 'Fruits of Philosophy'.' No doubt Bradlaugh got the lion's share.

In 1913, she admitted in evidence that she drew 10'000 or 12'000 rupees a year from the Theosopliical publishing house in London. She has provided £600 a year each to be paid to Krishnamurtl and his brother.

At the time she was brazenly retaining in her and Leadbeater's dual custody the two Hindu brothers (referred to in last issue), an appeal was made by leading Hindu officials on behalf of the father, who was beggared by the law costs of the suit he instituted against Mrs. Besant, for funds to carry the case further.

The appeal, published in a leading paper 'The Hindu', set out that the fight was against 'a person so influential and wealthy ag the President of the Theosophical Society,' and involved issues of much public importance from a social, religious and moral point of view.

It continued, "The Indian community cannot be sufficiently on its guard against the creeping into it of beliefs, practices, and teachings which are subversive of all morality and social order, and which are detrimental to the healthy development of the youths of this country on the lines of clean living and right thinking."

However, despite all this, Mrs. Besant found favor in certain social circles here: and has left her beloved friend Leadbeater behind, an object of suspicion mainly because of the past imputations against him regarding young boys, that, he still persists ill gathering in Ills well-preserved but senile presence.

Before her departure, Annie administered a public spanking to those who "blew the gaff" on her.

It is stated: "A number of Theosophists who have taken an active part in demanding an inquiry into the charges made relative to The Liberal Catholic Church, and certain of its dignitaries, have received a little note from Mrs, Besant cancelling their membership of the Esoteric School of Theosophy. They have been called upon to return all documents, photographs, etc., which have come into their possession as members of the School and told that Mrs. Besant can no longer regard them as her pupils."

Beforf she arrived in Sydney, Mrs. Besant was fully aware of the hostility among local Theosophists towards Leadbeater for, from Adyar, Madras, India.

On March 2, 1922, she sent a printed circular to the members of the local society in which she stated that she did not propose to enter into any detailed defence of "my honored Colleague, Bishop  C.W, Leadbeater, or of myself or any others slandered by name."

She also stated: "The published letter of Mr. Martyn contains a number of infamous accusations, none of which I believe, against persons whom I know to be in capable of the conduct charged."

It will be thus seen that Annie arrived here with the stubborn intention of sticking to Leadbeater, and she left; these shores with her original intention intact. The many mealy-mouthed at tempts on her part to excite sympathy in the face of the glaring revelations of what she knew of Leadbeater's past immoral and contaminating practices might well be'expected from this remarkable woman.

At various times she has cleverly writhed and twisted out of many tight corners, and helped others similarly placed to safety from a putrid morass of impurities. She helped Leadbeater back into the Theosophlcal Society after he had been Ignomlnlously exposed and ejected, and still has the brazen effrontery to try and foist him on this city — this time as a mitred prelate.

After the trounefags Leadbeater got at the various tribunals he was summoned before, both Theosophical and judicial, over his teachings and practices with boys, he has flagrantly set up an establishment here, and expects to be tolerated.

The question for the public is: how long is he to be permitted to affront the people with his insidious and unwhole some doctrines, muttered Into the ears of young boys, strutting through the ultra-respectable suburb where he lives, escorted like a mediaeval prelate, but looking more like a patriarchal popin jay?


Annie has gone, but the memory of her when she was a Bradlaughian Atheist, which form of Secularism she deserted — remains. Half of the Atheists of the National Secular, Society went over to George William Foote, and the remainder followed the scoundrel. Dr. E.B. Aveling, into Socialist societies. Annie, the clairvoyant, the author of mystic rot that would get a Sydney fortune-teller six months.

Annie, the author of 'The Law of Population', and the publisher of 'The Fruits of Philosophy', who taught race-destroying theories, such as her pet subject — the prevention of conception, has gone; but she has left Leadbeater!




Mr. Martyn

True Theosophists hold in disgust those who want to pse the Theosophical Society as a screen for filthy practices, and fore most among them Is a Sydney business man, Mr. T.H. Martyn, who has had ample opportunities of forming his plainly manifested aversion to Leadbeater.

He still admires Mrs. Besant as the head of the Society, in which he has held prominent and trusted positions, but her shielding of, and renewed confidence in, Leadbcater after what he witnessed and was confidentially informed in connection with the "Bishop" has shaken Mr. Martyn profoundly.

He denounced Leadbeater in scathing terms and earned the enmity and reproaches of his erstwhile confidante and friend, Mrs. Besant.

Before an enthusiastic audience of Theosophists Mr. Martyn recently lectured in the King's Hall, and said he accepted individual, responsibility for saying that the founding of the Order of The Star of the East by Mrs. Besant and Leadbeater had aroused fear of sectarianism.

Mr. Leadbeater had always been a storm-centre in the Society. He had been a High Church clergyman, and later a follower of Madame Blavatsky. Then he took to training boys. It was astonishing after all the trouble this had caused that he should have resumed that practice.

He had been accepted by the Theosophical Society, to a great extent, as the agent of the Hierarchy, and an authority on initiations.

When Leadbeater and Wedgwood met, it was like the meeting of the matchbox and tinder. Both were ceremoniallsts, and the result was the 'Liberal Catholic Church'. Mr. Wedgwood has made no excuse for his assumption of the title of 'Bishop' except that the only way he could get out of England and escape conscription, was as a "Bishop."

Mrs. Besant had lent her support to the two "Bishops" [Leadbeater and Wedgwood], and she had tried to thrust 'The Liberal Catholic Church' — a human-made organisation, on to the Theosophical Society.

(And Annie Besant succeeded, since from then the "bishops" of this pseudo-theosophical-Christian sect largely control the Theosophical Society of Adyar.)

He had been informed that this "church" in London had been built up on moral rottenness.


Mr. Martyn next said that Mrs. Besant had given him a message to bear to Australia, that Mr. Wedgwood must leave a body over which she had control. She said that great difficulty existed in maintaining a correct attitude in regard to the moral standards of members of the society, but where a member held a prominent position she considered it herduty to consider the good name of the society and keep it clean.

She stated that she had asked him to convey the message because she had heard that the police were taking the matter up. She believed the charges were true, and gave Ihim her reasons for the belief.

He delivered the message, and the only result was that ih one month Mrs. Besant was forced to recant. Mr. Jinaradajasa had told her that Mr. Wedgwood's expulsion would make a fundamental difference between her and Mr. Leadbeater, as Mr. Leadbeater had declared Mr. Wedgwood an initiate.

The moral issue at stake was apparently overlooked, the point made by Mr. Jinaradajasa being that, as Mr. Wedgwood had been admitted as an initiate by Mr. Leadbeater, the latter's judgment in the matter ought not to be set at variance.

That left him absolutely floored in his confidence in Mr. Leadbeater, because he knew of the way in which Mr. Leadbeater had held Mr. Wedgwood up as a great moral power. Naturally, he came to the conclusion that Mr. Leadbeater's initiates were mistakes, and he held that opinion still.

(Charles Leadbeater claimed that his accomplices were "initiates": Wedgwood, Arundale, Rukmini, etc.; but in reality, they were all swindlers just like Leadbeater.)


Mr. Martyn then read the Farrar confession as to inmorality in connection with the Liberal Catholic Church, and criticised Mrs. Besant's action in ignoring it.

It was unfortunately a reflection upon her. he said, when one considered her responsibility as president of the Theosophlcal Society. How ever, so far as her dismissal of the subject by "Take it to the police" was concerned, there was plenty of evidence that the police could have if they wanted it: and it was better that they should nave it than that the matter should not be dealt with at all.




Epilogue

The result of the influence of this church movement in tiie society was that it became necessary to form an organisation which would counteract the influence, and that organisation was the Loyalty League. There was a tendency to fall down and worship certain individuals because they were occultists.

Sydney is well rid of Mrs. Besant, but there still remains Leadbeater, about whom Mr. Martyn says, proof of his undesirability can be got among certain members of the Society.

It has been ascertained by 'Truth' that the Minister of Justice is having inquiries made, which might bear fruition. Leadbeater is a most undesirable person to have in any community. An initial step should be taken by the authorities of stripping him of the power to perform marriages.

Even if he be sheltering behind certain highly-placed and influential friends this should not be allowed to baulk the full est investigation into the conduct of this self-styled "Arhat" [High Initiate].










BIOGRAPHIES ABOUT ANNIE BESANT



TEXTS



        Wikipedia biography
        Biography of Theosophy Wiki






HER AUTOBIOGRAPHY

Annie Besant published her autobiography in London in 1893, when she was only 46 years old, and it covers the first half of her life (until Blavatsky's death in 1891), since Besant died in 1933 when she was almost 86 years old.




OTHER BIOGRAPHICAL TEXTS

Agarwal, CV & Pedro Oliveira. Annie Besant in India.

Aiyangar, M.V. Srinivasa. An Open Letter to Mrs. Annie Besant; Being a Reply to Her Attacks on Hinduism. Madras, M. C. Narasimhacharya [1915].

Aiyar, Ramaswami. Annie Besant. Delhi Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, [1963].

Besant, Arthur Digby. The Besant Pedigree. London: Besant & Co., 1930.

Besterman, Theodor. Mrs. Annie Besant, a Modern Prophet, London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd., 1934.

Besterman, Theodore. The Annie Besant Calendar. London: The Theosophical Pub. House, 1927.

Besterman, Theodore. A Bibliography of Annie Besant. London, The Theosophical society in England, 1924.

Bright, Esther. Old Memories and Letters of Annie Besant. London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1936.

Dictionary of National Biography. "Besant, Annie", Dictionary of National Biography. Available at the Oxford DNB website. This is a particularly well-written account of her life.

Dinnage, Rosemary. Annie Besant. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1986.

Fussell, Joseph H. Mrs. Annie Besant and the Leadbeater Advice. San Diego: 1913. Pamphlet.

Indian Section, Theosophical Society. In honor of Dr. Annie Besant: Lectures by Eminent Persons, 1952-88. Varanasi, UP, India: Indian Section, Theosophical Society, 1990.

Kumar, Yudhistera. Annie Besant as an Indian Educator. With a foreword by B. Pattabhi Sitaramayya. Lashkar, Gwalior, Swarup Publications [introduction, 1951].

Mukerji, NN Unemployment and Limitation of Family. With 46 illus. and ports. of Mr. Charles Bradlaugh and Mrs. Annie Besant of 1877. Calcutta, NN Mukerji, 1918.

Muthanna, IM Mother Besant and Mahatma Gandhi. Vellore, Tamil Nadu: Thenpulam, 1986.

Nethercot, Arthur Hobart. The First Five Lives of Annie Besant. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.

Nethercot, Arthur Hobart. The Last Four Lives of Annie Besant. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.

Pécastaing-Boissiere, Muriel. Annie Besant (1847-1933): La lutte et la quête. Paris: Éditions Adyar, 2015. English edition: Annie Besant: Struggles and Quest. London: Theosophical Publishing House, 2017. German edition: Annie Besant : Weisheit und Wissenschaft - Die Biographie. Aquamarin-Verlag GmbH, 2017.

Prakasa, Sri. Annie Besant. Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1954.

Prakasa, Sri. Annie Besant as Woman and as Leader. 3rd edition - Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1962.

Pruthi, Raj. Annie Besant's rise to power in Indian politics, 1914-1917. New Delhi: Concept Pub. Co., 1981.

Prakasa, Sri. Annie Besant. Bombay, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1954. 2nd ed.

Prakasa, Sri. Annie Besant as Woman and as Leader. Bombay, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1962. 3rd ed.

Taylor, Anne. Annie Besant: A Biography.

Theosophical Society. Woman World Honored: Annie Besant, Warrior. Madras, Theosophical Pub. House, 1943.

Veritas [pseudonym]. Mrs. Besant and the Alcyone Case. Mylapore, Madras [India]: Goodwin & Co., 1913.

Wessinger, Catherine. Annie Besant and Progressive Messianism (1847-1933). Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press, 1988.

West, Geoffrey [pseudonym]. Annie Besant. New York, Viking Press, 1928.

Williams, Gertrude Marvin. The Passionate Pilgrim: a Life of Annie Besant. New York: Coward-McCann, 1931.






DOCUMENTARIES

BBC documentary

The BBC is the UK's public broadcaster, and in 1984 it released a documentary series entitled "Sea of ​​Faith" in which philosopher Don Cupitt explores the works and lives of a mix of thinkers, and this video contains the section where he discusses on Annie Besant.







Lukasfilm documentary

Documentary produced in 2007 by George Lukas' Production Company entitled "Annie Besant: The Unlikely Rebel" to complement his series "The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones" in which Annie Besant appears in one of the episodes when the child Indiana Jones meets the teenager Krishnamurti.










WHY DO SOME OF KUTHUMI'S LETTERS RESEMBLE BLAVATSKY'S LETTERS?

 





CALLIGRAPHY

Some graphologists have commented that Kuthumi's handwriting, which appears in some of the letters that this master wrote to Mr. Alfred Sinnett, resembles Blavatsky's handwriting.

Blavatsky explained that this is because the master used her as his energetic intermediary to paranormally precipitate his letters over great distances, and in doing so, Kuthumi's handwriting combined with Blavatsky's handwriting.

On this matter, the Sanskrit scholar Charles Johnston had the following conversation with Blavatsky:

«
-       “There is one thing about the Society for Psychical Research Report that I want you to explain to me. What about the handwriting of the masters' letters?”
 
-       “Well, what about it?” asked H. P. B., immediately interested.
 
-       “They say that you wrote them yourself, and that they bear evident marks of your handwriting and style. What do you say to that?”

-       “Let me explain it this way,” she answered, after a long gaze at the end of her cigarette. “Have you ever made experiments in thought-transference? If you have, you must have noticed that the person who receives the mental picture very often colors it, or even changes it slightly, with his own thought, and this where perfectly genuine transference of thought takes place.

     Well, it is something like that with the precipitated letters. One of our Masters, who perhaps does not know English, and of course has no English handwriting, wishes to precipitate a letter in answer to a question sent mentally to him. Let us say he is in Tibet, while I am in Madras or London. He has the answering thought in his mind, but not in English words.

     He has first to impress that thought on my brain, or on the brain of someone else who knows English, and then to take the word-forms that rise up in that other brain to answer the thought. Then he must form a clear mind-picture of the words in writing, also drawing on my brain, or the brain of whoever it is, for the shapes. Then either through me or some Chela with whom he is magnetically connected, he has to precipitate these word-shapes on paper, first sending the shapes into the Chela’s mind, and then driving them into the paper, using the magnetic force of the Chela to do the printing, and collecting the material, black or blue or red, as the case may be, from the astral light.

     As all things dissolve into the astral light, the will of the magician can draw them forth again. So he can draw forth colours of pigments to mark the figure in the letter, using the magnetic force of the Chela to stamp them in, and guiding the whole by his own much greater magnetic force, a current of powerful will.”

-       “That sounds quite reasonable,” I answered. “Won’t you show me how it is done?”

-       “You would have to be clairvoyant,” she answered, in a perfectly direct and matter-of-fact way, “in order to see and guide the currents. But this is the point: Suppose the letter precipitated through me; it would naturally show some traces of my expressions, and even of my writing; but all the same, it would be a perfectly genuine occult phenomenon, and a real message from that Mahatma.

     Besides, when all is said and done, they exaggerate the likeness of the writings. And experts are not infallible. We have had experts who were just as positive that I could not possibly have written those letters, and just as good experts, too. But the Report says nothing about them.

     And then there are letters, in just the same handwriting, precipitated when I was thousands of miles away. Dr. Hartmann received more than one at Adyar, Madras, when I was in London; I could hardly have written that."
»
(CW VIII, p.392-408)



Observation

Skeptical people will think that what Blavatsky said was made up, but esoterically it could be true. This characteristic, where the handwriting of the sender and receiver blend together, is observed in another occult phenomenon: when an entity writes through someone in a trance state, known as 'automatic writing.'

However, I perceive a significant difference between Blavatsky's handwriting and that of Master Kuthumi.



Blavatsky's handwriting





Kuthumi's handwriting










DRAFTING

Blavatsky was also criticized for the peculiarities of Kuthumi's English in her letters, which her detractors considered proof that she had written them. However, Blavatsky explained that this was because Kuthumi had taught her English, and that was why she had acquired these peculiarities.

Regarding this matter, she wrote to Mr. Sinnett:

« Janvier 6, 1886. Wurzburg.

My dear Mr. Sinnett

I am impressed to give you the following: First let me tell you that the dear Countess went off to Munich like a shot to try and save Hubbe from his weakness and the Society from crumbling down. She was the whole evening in a trance, getting out and in from her body. She saw Master and felt him all the night. She is a great clairvoyant.

Well, after reading a few pages of the Report I was so disgusted with Hume's gratuitous lies and Hodgson's absurd inferences that I nearly gave up all in despair. What could I do or say against evidence on the natural worldly plane!

Everything went against me and I had but to die. I went to bed and I had the most extraordinary vision. I had vainly called upon the Masters — who came not during my waking state, but now in my sleep I saw them both, I was again (a scene of years back) in Mahatma K.H.'s house. I was sitting in a corner on a mat and he walking about the room in his riding dress, and Master was talking to someone behind the door. "I remind can't" — I pronounced in answer to a question of His about a dead aunt. — He smiled and said "Funny English you use."

Then I felt ashamed, hurt in my vanity, and began thinking (mind you, in my dream or vision which was the exact reproduction of what had taken place word for word 16 years ago) "now I am here and speaking nothing but English in verbal phonetic language I can perhaps learn to speak better with Him."

(To make it clear with Master I also used English, which whether bad or good was the same for Him as he does not speak it but understands every word I say out of my head; and I am made to understand Him — how I could never tell or explain if I were killed but I do. With D.K. I also spoke English, he speaking it better even than Mahatma K.H.)

Then, in my dream still, three months after as I was made to feel in that vision — I was standing before Mahatma K.H. near the old building taken down he was looking at, and as Master was not at home, I took to him a few sentences I was studying in Senzar in his sister's room and asked him to tell me if I translated them correctly — and gave him a slip of paper with these sentences written in English.

He took and read them and correcting the interpretation read them over and said "Now your English is becoming better — try to pick out of my head even the little I know of it." And he put his hand on my forehead in the region of memory and squeezed his fingers on it (and I felt even the same trifling pain in it, as then, and the cold shiver I had experienced) and since that day He did so with my head daily, for about two months.

Again, the scene changes and I am going away with Master who is sending me off, back to Europe. I am bidding good bye to his sister and her child and all the chelas. I listen to what the Masters tell me. And then come the parting words of Mahatma K.H. laughing at me as He always did and saying "Well, if you have not learned much of the Sacred Sciences and practical Occultism — and who could expect a woman to — you have learned, at any rate, a little English. You speak it now only a little worse than I do!" and he laughed.

Again the scene changes I am 47th St. New York writing Isis and His voice dictating to me. In that dream or retrospective vision I once more rewrote all Isis and could now point out all the pages and sentences Mahatma K.H. dictated — as those that Master did — in my bad English, when Olcott tore his hair out by handfuls in despair to ever make out the meaning of what was intended.

I again saw myself night after night in bed — writing Isis in my dreams, at New York, positively writing it in my sleep and felt sentences by Mahatma K.H. impressing themselves on my memory.

Then, as I was awakening from that vision (in Würzburg, now) I heard Mahatma K. H.'s voice — "and now put two and two together, poor blind woman. The bad English and the construction of sentences you do know, even that you have learned from me . . . take off the slur thrown upon you by that misguided, conceited man (Hodgson): explain the truth to the few friends who will believe you — for the public never will to that day that the Secret Doctrine comes out."

I awoke, and it was like a flash of lightning; but I still did not understand what it referred to. But an hour after, there comes H[um]ubbe Schleiden's letter to the Countess, in which he says, that unless I explain how it is that such a similarity is found and proven by Hodgson between my faulty English and Mahatma K.H.'s certain expressions, the construction of sentences and peculiar Gallicisms — I stand accused for ever of deceit forgery (!!) and what not.

Of course I have learned my English from Him! This Olcott even shall understand. You know and I told it to many friends and enemies — I was taught dreadful Yorkshire by my nurse called governess. From the time my father brought me to England, when fourteen, thinking I spoke beautiful English — and people asked him if he had me educated in Yorkshire or Ireland — and laughed at my accent and way of speaking — I gave up English altogether trying to avoid speaking it as much as I could.

From fourteen till I was over forty I never spoke it, let alone writing and forgot it entirely. I could read — which I did very little in English — I could not speak it. I remember how difficult it was for me to understand a well written book in English so far back only as 1867 in Venice.

All I knew when I came to America in 1873 was to speak a little and this Olcott and Judge and all who knew me then can testify to. I wish people saw an article I once attempted to write for the Banner of Light when instead of sanguine I put sanguinary, etc.

I learned to write it through Isis, that's sure and Prof. A. Wilder who came weekly to help Olcott arranging chapters and writing Index can testify to it. When I had finished it (and this Isis is the third part only of what I wrote and destroyed) I could write as well as I do now not worse nor better. My memory and its capacities seem gone since then.

What wonder then that my English and the Mahatma's show similarity!

Olcott's and mine do also in our Americanisms that I picked up from him these ten years. I translating mentally all from the French would not have written sceptic with a k; though Mahatma K.H. did and when I put it with a c Olcott and Wilder and the proof reader corrected it.

Now Mahatma K.H. has preserved the habit and stuck to it and I never did since I went to India. I would have never put carbolic instead of "carbonic" — and I was the first to remark the mistake when Hume Mahatma's letter, at Simla, in which it occurs. It is mean and stupid of him to publish it, for, if he says this referred to a sentence found in some magazine, then the word correctly written was there before my eyes or those of any chela who precipitated the letter, and therefore it is evidently a lapsus calami if there were any calami in precipitation.

"Difference in handwritings" — oh the great wonder! Has Master K.H. written himself all His letters? How many chelas have been precipitating and writing them — heaven only knows. Now if there is such a marked difference between letters written by the same identical person mechanically, (as the case with me for instance who never had a steady handwriting) how much more in precipitation, which is the photographic reproduction from one's head.

And I bet anything that no chela (if Masters can) is capable of precipitating his own handwriting twice over in precisely the same way — a difference and a marked one there shall always be, as no painter can paint twice over the same likeness (see Schmiechen with his (Master's portraits).

Now all this shall be easily understood by theosophists (not all) and those who have thought over deeply and know something of the philosophy. Who shall believe all I say in this letter outside of the few? No one.

And yet, I am demanded an explanation and when it comes out (if you write it out from facts I can give you) no one shall believe it. Yet you have to show at least one thing: occult transactions, letters handwriting etc. cannot be judged by the daily standard, experts, this that and the other. There are no three solutions but two: Either I have invented the Masters, their philosophy, written their letters etc. or, I have not.

If I have and the Masters do not exist, then their handwritings could not have existed, either: I have invented them also; and if I have — how can I be called a "forger"? They are my handwritings and I have the right to use them if I am so clever. As for philosophy and doctrine invented the S.D. shall show.


Now I am here alone with the Countess for witness. I have no books no one to help me. And I tell you that the Secret Doctrine will be 20 times as learned, philosophical and better than Isis which will be killed by it.

Now there are hundreds of things I am permitted to say and explain. It will show what a Russian spy can do, an alleged forger plagiarist etc. The whole Doctrine is shown the mother stone the foundation of all the religions including Xty, and on the strength of exoteric published Hindu books, with their symbols explained esoterically.

The extreme lucidity of "Esoteric Buddhism" will also be shown and its doctrines proven correct mathematically, geometrically logically and scientifically. Hodgson is very clever, but he is not clever enough for truth and it shall triumph after which I can die peacefully. »
(ML 140, p.478-481 )
 



Blavatsky also gave this explanation to Dr. Hübbe:

« To Dr. Hübbe-Schleiden, President of the Theosophical Society of Germany and the other German regions. 
. . .


I am also accused of "similarity of style" — the same mistakes  — spelling, gallicisms etc etc. Ergo I am Mahatma KH and he is I .  But why not explain it in the correct way?

Ask Olcott, Judge & all those who knew me in America before I wrote Isis.  They will tell you that I hardly spoke English.  That most of the pages of Isis, where there is anything worth reading were dicated to me by Master KH.  — sometimes 30, 40 pages at a time without one mistake as Olcott & Dr Wilder know; that I learned to write English with him, the Master & spelt as he did in Isis sceptic with a K & Bakkus instead of Bacchus & so on.

Till 1868, I had ceased to speak English having learned it in my childhood.  And only from February 1868 till 70, some nine or ten months & then for about six months I spoke only English for I knew neither Tibetan nor Hindi, nor anything  — with the Mahatma.

I may say I relearned the little English I knew when I came to America in 1873 from Him.  I learned positively to write, from him while writing Isis.

When I arrived to India I began spelling sceptic (a word unfortunately too often used in our Society) with a c having been laughed at for my previous spelling & [4] KH. went on spelling it in His own way.

He precipitated & wrote through me hundreds of letters before I went to America & met Olcott but my Master protested saying it was mediumship.  I actually thought the first letter He wrote to Mr Sinnett had been written through me at Simla; only I was told by Him I was mistaken.  Nor would Mr Sinnett believe it.

As to my Master  — he does not know one word of English.  Every letter he wrote he had to take his English either from my head or that of one of his English speaking chelas.  There are no miracles in nature.  Everything that occurs must have its cause its effect.
(www.blavatskyarchives.com/hpblet010486.htm)
 


Observation

It makes very sense that if Master Kuthumi taught Blavatsky English, then Blavatsky speaks this language as Kuthumi does.