Notice: I have written in other languages, many interesting articles that you
can read translated in English in this
link.

DO WE GROW AND AGE ALSO IN HEAVEN?




When people asked him:

Are our human souls born as infants or as adults into the Devachanic state?


William Judge replied:


« It seems to me to be a mistake to consider questions relating to the soul from the materialistic point of view of “infant” or “adult.” The soul is not born, nor does it die; it cannot be called an infant or an adult; those terms should only be used as more or less metaphorical, to show, as the Editor points out, a difference in character.

The soul assumes in the astral or ethereal realms of being that shape or form which most resembles its real character: it may seem to be what we would call infant or adult irrespective of the age of the body it had just quitted, or it might take the form of a beast or maybe a deformed, misshapen human body if its real life could be but fitly thus represented.

This was well known to Swedenborg and many other seers, who saw souls wandering in such shapes which the very law of their being compelled them to assume. And it does not require physical death to bring this about, for in life many a person presents to the clairvoyant the actual picture of the inner character, no matter how horrible that may be.

Form, shape, or lineament has then in the life of the soul to do with essential character. It is reported that one of the Adepts writing of Devachan spoke of our growing old there and their [sic] dying out of it. But this means, as was also then explained, only the uprush of force, its continuance in activity, and then at last its gradual decline to extinction or birth into another life. »
(Echoes of the Orient II, p.359)





OBSERVATIONS

When Theosophy mentions that the human souls born, grow, age and die in Devachan, it is not in the sense as it occurs in the physical body on Earth, but it is an analogy to illustrate the process that the consciousness passes during its stay in the Devachan.

The consciousness begins first by arising in the devachanic state, then she develops and increases her forces until reaching her maximum expression, and later her forces begins to gradually decrease until finally they are extinguished, and then humans reincarnate again on Earth.

And Master Pasteur pointed out that in higher planes of existence, the soul takes the form of a luminous sphere, that is to say that she has no longer a physical appearance, but only a synthesis of the energies that radiate inside the soul.










DO ANIMALS ALSO GO TO HEAVEN?





William Judge gave the following answer:

« Looking at the question in the light of Theosophical theories, we see that a wide distinction exists between man and animals. Man reincarnates as man because he has got to the top of the present scale of evolution. He cannot go back, for Manas is too much developed. He has a Devachan because he is a conscious thinker. Animals cannot have Manas so much developed, and so cannot be self-conscious in the sense that man is. »
(Path, April 1894, p.5)



Blavatsky also noted that when humans were just beginning to form, they had neither Kama-Loka nor Devachan, because although these subtle plans already existed in Creation, the humans still did not have sufficiently developed their principle Kama (desires) and their principle Manas (mental) to be able to experience those states after death.

Master Pasteur indicated that animals already have these two principles (Kama and Manas) and consequently animals already desire and think, but on a much more basic level than humans.

William Judge pointed out that the animals after they die, they remain for a short period of time on the astral plane, before reincarnating on Earth, either in the same species or in a more developed species.

And I suspect that the most advanced animals must already experiment after their death, a small Kama-Loka, because their Kama principle (desire) is already sufficiently developed to be able to experience the Kama-Loka, although this will be much more basic than human experience.









HEAVEN, PURGATORY AND HELL EXPLAINED BY WILLIAM JUDGE




On this subject, William Judge wrote the following:


« Heaven and Hell are also common to Christianity, Buddhism, and Brahmanism. The Brahman calls it Svarga; the Buddhist, Devachan; and we, Heaven. Its opposite is Naraka and Avichi. But names apart, the descriptions are the same. Indeed, the hells of the Buddhists are very terrible, long in duration and awful in effect.

The difference is that the heaven and hell of the Christian are eternal, while the others are not. The others come to an end when the forces which cause them are exhausted. In teaching of more than one heaven there is the same likeness, for St. Paul spoke of more than a single heaven to one of which he was rapt away, and the Buddhist tells of many, each being a grade above or below some other.

Brahman and Buddhist agree in saying that when heaven or hell is ended for the soul, it descends again to rebirth. And that was taught by the Jews. They held that the soul was originally pure, but sinned and had to wander through rebirth until purified and fit to return to its source. »
(Echoes of the Orient I, p.439)




« The Christians have been teaching about heaven and hell; about a sort of heaven which is very material, I admit, with pearly gates and golden streets and angels with robes such as no one ever saw and crowns upon their heads; and hell full of fire and brimstone, with devils throwing people around with forks into the fire.

The Buddhists have been teaching the same thing for ages. I can read to you out of their books about a copper vessel full of boiling oil into which they say fate puts a man. In this he goes down and down for thousands and thousands of years until he gets to the bottom; then he begins to rise again to the top, rising for ages again, and when he gets to the top and thinks he is going to be let out, he begins to sink again, and that goes on for ages more. Is not that as bad and as material as the Christian hell?

And then the Eastern teaching of heaven, of an inimitable and incomprehensible place, yet just as material but better than the Christian heaven. »
(Echoes of the Orient II, p.154)




« The state of spiritual but comparative rest known as Devachan is not an eternal one, and so is not the same as the eternal heaven of Christianity. Nor does “hell” correspond to the state known to Theosophical writers as Avichi.

All such painful states are transitory and purificatory states. When those are passed the individual goes into Devachan.

“Hell” and Avichi are thus not the same. Avichi is the same as the “second death,” as it is in fact annihilation that only comes to the “black Magician” or spiritually wicked, as will be seen further on. »
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.63)






« With reference to post-mortem conditions, Theosophy teaches two states of existence somewhat analogous to the Christian “purgatory” and “heaven.” The first, immediately subsequent to earth-life, is Kama-Loka, where the immortal triad takes leave of the lower principles remaining after separation from the body. Thence the Ego passes into Devachan.

The former is, as its name indicates, a place — the astral plane penetrating and surrounding the earth — the latter a state of being, or rather of consciousness. In Kama-Loka all the hidden passions and desires are let loose, and enough mentality is retained to make them tortures. When the astral body in which they cohere is disintegrated, as it is in time, they remain a sort of entity in the kama-rupa, a form of still less materiality than the Linga-Sarira.

Eventually this too is said to fade out, leaving only their essence, the Skandhas, fateful germs of karmic consequence, which, when the Ego emerges from the devachanic state, are by the law of attraction drawn to the new being in which it incarnates.

Owing to the law of cohesion between the principles, which prevents their separation before a given time, the untimely dead must pass in Kama-Loka a period almost equal to the length life would have been but for the sudden termination.

Losing the body has not killed them. They still consciously exist in the astral body, and in the case of very wicked and forceful persons — some executed criminals, for instance — may be even more harmful on the astral plane than they were in life. Prolonged kama-lokic existence is no injustice to the victims of accident, since death, like everything else, is a karmic consequence.


Finally, it may be said of Kama-Loka that it is the last conscious state of the thoroughly evil human souls bereft of the spiritual tie and doomed to annihilation (Avichi). Having in life centered the consciousness in the kamic principle, preserved intellect and rejected the spirit, leading persistent lives of evil for its own sake, they are the only damned beings we know.

Pure souls speedily pass from Kama-Loka to the devachanic state. It is a period of rest, a real existence, no more illusionary than earth life, where the essence of the thoughts of life that were as high as character permitted expands and is garnered by the soul and mind. When the force of these thoughts is fully exhausted the soul is once more drawn back to earth, to that environment which will best promote its further evolution. »
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.236-7)







OBSERVATION

Here, I only put the William Judge's summary explanations on this subject, but you can also read his detailed explanations in this other article.










HELL EXPLAINED BY WILLIAM JUDGE





Theosophy teaches that the main hell is lived on the physical plane, because it is during the incarnation that humans have to deal with the negative karma that they have generated, and that is why you see so much suffering on Earth.

And about this subject, William Judge mentioned the following:


« The Oriental doctrine of reward and punishment of the human Ego is very different from the theological scheme accepted throughout Christendom, since the Brahmans and Buddhists fix the place of punishment and compensation upon this earth of ours, while the Christian removes the “bar of God” to the hereafter.

We may not profitably stop to argue upon logic with the latter; it will be sufficient to quote to them the words of Jesus, St. Matthew, and the Psalmist. “With what measure ye mete, it shall be measured unto you again,” said Jesus [Matt 7:2]; and Matthew declares that for every word, act, and thought we shall have to answer, while David, the royal poet, sang that those who serve the Lord should never eat beggar’s bread.

We all know well that the first two declarations do away with the vicarious atonement; and as for the Jewish singer’s notion, it is negatived every day in any city of either hemisphere.

Among the Ceylonese Buddhists the name of the doctrine is Kamma; with the Hindus it is Karma. Viewed in its religious light, it “is the good and bad deeds of sentient beings, by the infallible influence or efficacy of which those beings are met with due rewards or punishment, according as they deserve, in any state of being.”

When a being dies, he emits, as it were, a mass of force or energy, which goes to make up the new personality when he shall be reincarnated. In this energy is found the summation of the life just given up, and by means of it the Ego is forced to assume that sort of body among those appropriate circumstances which together are the means for carrying out the decrees of Karma.

Hence hell is not a mythical place or condition after death in some unknown region specially set apart by the Almighty for the punishment of his children, but is in very truth our own globe, for it is on the earth, in earth-lives experienced in human bodies, that we are punished for bad deeds previously done, and meet with happiness and pleasure as rewards for old merit.

When one sees, as is so common, a good man suffering much in his life, the question naturally arises, “Has Karma anything to do with it, and is it just that such a person should be so afflicted?”

For those who believe in Karma it is quite just, because this man in a previous life must have done such acts as deserve punishment now.

(Note: It is usually due to that, but also the suffering may be due to the fact that the person is a victim of the circumstances, and then in her next life, she will be compensated.)

And, similarly, the wicked man who is free from suffering, happy and prosperous, is so because in a previous existence he had been badly treated by his fellows or had experienced much suffering. And the perfect justice of Karma is well illustrated in his case because, although now favored by fortune, he, being wicked, is generating causes which, when he shall be reborn, will operate then to punish him for his evil-doing now.


Some may suppose that the Ego should be punished after death, but such a conclusion is not logical. For evil deeds committed here on the objective plane could not with any scientific or moral propriety be punished on a plane which is purely subjective. And such is the reason why so many minds, both of the young and old have rejected and rebelled against the doctrine of a hell-fire in which they would be eternally punished for commission of sin on earth.

Even when unable to formulate the reason in metaphysical terms, they instinctively knew that it would be impossible to remove the scene of compensation from the very place where the sin and confusion had been done and created. When the disciples of Jesus asked him if the man who was born blind was thus brought into the world for some sin he had committed, they had in mind this doctrine of Karma, just as all the Hindus and Buddhists have when they see some of their fellows crippled or deformed or deprived of sight.

The theory above hinted at of the person at death throwing out from himself the new personality, so to speak, ready to await the time when the Ego should return to earth seeking a new body, is a general law that operates in a great many other instances besides the birth or death of a being. It is that which is used by the Theosophists to explain the relations between the moon and the earth. »
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.33)





We see that the physical plane is the place for action, while heaven is the place for rest (even for people who were bad).

The exception to this rule are those individuals who were so extremely bad, that they will not have a period of rest and happiness after death, but they will experience a terrible period of suffering and torment.

And this is the hell that religions talk about, and it is located in the lowest area of purgatory. But Theosophy explains that it is not eternal, but temporary (like the stay in heaven), and then the humans reincarnate again.






And that is why, when people asked William Judge:

Does Theosophy teach that this earth is the hell of this planetary system?  And, if so, does each solar system have its own hell?


William Judge replied:


« Very many writers affirm it to be their opinion that the real hell is this earth, but it is not clear that such is the view “of Theosophy,” meaning thereby the exact truth. It was taught, apparently, by Buddha that there is a hell after death of the body, and some of the conditions of Kama-Loka are a hell most surely; it is also taught in Hinduism that there is a hell apart from earth-life.

Some Kabbalists seem to lean to the view that earth is hell, and when we consider the troubles of the soul therein it would appear to be so. For what could be more dreadful than to be living on the earth with a full knowl edge that your acts will lead to a worse state after death and may finally blot out the soul?

But in my opinion the question of hell, like that of heaven, is to be decided on a consideration of a man as a thinker who thinks always and who is because he is a thinker. Hence his life at any time or place must be the result of his thoughts, must be founded on his thoughts, and have its color and effect from his thoughts.

So if after the death of the body his thoughts before that naturally lead to the weaving of a beautiful, heavenly web, he will reside in those thoughts until they are exhausted, and then coming back to earth again his only hell will be this life.

But if, enjoying himself or not here, he indulges in those thoughts that inevitably lead to the bitterness of a black life in Kāma-Loka, then his hell must be a stage or condition of that state of the very worst description, to which earth-life is heaven in comparison; in his case the return to life here would be heaven and the other life hell.

(Note: Master Kuthumi explained that very few humans get this suffering experience after death, because the person really had to be extremely malevolent in order not to have even a short period of rest and happiness during his post-mortem stay before returning to reincarnate.)

This leads me to the conclusion that the very lowest and worst hell must be a condition of the mind, and that it must have place out of a body and hence be a stage or degree of Kāma-Loka.

This would explain the various statements as to hells, because the awful condition that some souls must be in after the limitations of the body are shaken off, would be of just the sort described, and their particular locus should be in the vicinity of the earth, as that is the representative of the grossest form of matter.

If the law of analogy is to rule, then other worlds must have their own hells of this sort; but the solar system seems to be quite a large enough subject for us to be content with for the present.

But it seems to me that all the theories of hell, no matter of what awful variety, are founded on the life of the mind and the soul, and to be drawn from descriptions of that life according to natural results.

A dream of oppressive character will give some idea of what a hell may be, for there the mind devoid of body is suffering that which the body afterwards knows to be wholly of thought. »
(Echoes of the Orient II, p.363-4)










THE KAMA-RUPA EXPLAINED BY WILLIAM JUDGE




The theosophical teachers explained that after dying, the person is divided into two parts: his good part ascends to Devachan ("Heaven"), while his bad part remains in Kama-Loka ("Purgatory") where it will gradually disintegrate.

And that bad part is called in Theosophy, "Kama-Rupa", and below I transcribe the explanations gave by William Judge (and in brackets I added my comments), but so that you have a better understanding, I recommend you first read the preliminary explanation that William Judge gave, which I put in this other article (link).




The division of the person in Kama-Loka

Before the good part of Manas enters the Devachan state, the bad part of Manas with the dregs of the Auric Envelope has formed the kama-rupa, and this latter has in most cases been dissipated to form Taṇhic elementals. Thus the lower Manas has no relation to the Higher in Devachan, for the Taṇhic elementals are not existent on that plane of consciousness. This is fully explained in book The Key to Theosophy [Section IX, pp. 143-5, TUP ed.], where it should be studied.
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.365)





What is kama-rupa?

Kama-rupa, the body of desire (which remains after death), is a word used loosely in exoteric writings to denote the fourth principle (Kama), the passional nature, with its animal and sensual desires. It is the latest developed aspect of the lower quaternary, and is found in animals as well as in man. The word “rupa,” however, is a misnomer. Kama has no rupa during life; vide Third Instructions.

After death the rupa is formed of the dregs of the Auric Envelope, and these dregs, with the animal passions and emotions, are the kama-rupa. This survives in Kama-Loka a longer or shorter time, according to the strength of these elements in the late personality; if drawn into the current of a medium, and obtaining from him a faint reflection of intelligence, it becomes the “spook of the séance-room;” in case of separation from the Higher Self, it reincarnates on earth, forming the worse type of human being.

The Esotericist must distinguish clearly between the Kamic principle in the personality, and the kama-rupa which is the embodiment of that principle after death.

Note. — Many students answered this question by merely translating kama-rupa into “body of desire” — an answer that could have been given by any outsider who had picked up a Theosophical publication dealing with the seven principles. Only a very small minority stated that the rupa was formed after death — a fact which seems to imply that a great majority of Esotericists have not taken the trouble to read the Third Instructions. Such gross ignorance as the confounding of kama-rupa with Kama-Loka is also shown in some of the answers.

The mistake in some cases was probably due to the acceptation by the students of Mr. Sinnett’s classification, without any analysis. Kama-rupa must be included in the classification, because potentially it exists, although it is not concentrated or collected into a definite form until death breaks up the body.

This may be understood in the same way as when we say that in such-and-such a man’s body there are so many ounces of carbon, which, however, we know will not reveal themselves as carbon until released from the other elements.
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.295-6)






Clarification on an apparent contradiction

Commentary from R.J.N.: In Forum No. 18, p. 5, lines 27-9, W.Q.J. says, “In a case of ordinary demise the astral body dissipates, so does kama-rupa.”  Here the impression is that kama-rupa exists before and in a case of “ordinary demise” dissipates at death.

Remarks on Examination Paper No. I, pp. 295-6, says “Kama has no rupa during life;”. . . “The Esotericist must distinguish clearly between the kamic principle in the personality and the kama-rupa which is the embodiment of that principle after death,”. . . “Only a very small minority stated that the rupa was formed after death.”

Instructions No. III, page [608n] says, “It is erroneous when speaking of the fifth human principle, to call it ‘the kama-rupa.’ It is no rupa or form at all, except after death: but the kamic elements, animal desires, passions, such as anger, lust, envy, revenge, etc., the products of selfishness and matter.”

Now how is the statement of W.Q.J. in the Forum to be reconciled with these conflicting quotations?


Answer: I do not consider the statements quoted to be conflicting. The Instructions and Suggestions are written for the members of the E.S.; the Forum is intended for outsiders. The words quoted from the Forum do not infer anything. They state that kama-rupa dissipates after death, which is the fact, and which does not negative the statement made in Instructions that kama has no rupa — or form — until death.

If I were writing so as to inform the public clearly that kama-rupa dissipates after death I would say that the kama principle assumes a form at death and afterwards dissipates. The only inference that could be drawn from the Forum citation is that kama-rupa assumed a form at some time not stated.

During life the kamic principle is distributed through the whole system, and not specialized. At death the whole lower force of the dying person centers itself in kama, draws the whole principle together from the rest of the combination, and then assumes a distinct form of its own.

This is clearly given in Instructions No. III, and it is better to read that than pay much attention to the errors or omissions of W.Q.J. in Forum or elsewhere, as he admits the correctness of the Instructions. Pages [608-10] will settle the question clearly and also answer the question sent lately on the same subject.

According to No. III, [609-10]:

a)   The kama-rupa fades out in time after the death of the body;
b)   After thus fading its Karmic record is left, as a collection of elementals, who go to make up the astral form which —
c)   Is born within the Auric Envelope for the purpose of forming the model around which the new human foetus is constructed.

This is the process in broad outline, including many details not worked out. Among others of these is the problem: What is the fate and function of a kama-rupa which lasts many centuries after death of the body? Does it or does it not have anything to do with the reincarnating Ego which cast if off in a preceding life? If it does, what effect does it produce?

These questions should be replied to for forwarding to London.
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.320-1)






How is kama-rupa formed?

Question: What is the process whereby the Kamic elements of man become embodied after death in the entity known as the kama­rupa? How can intangible subjective desires, passions, and the like become “rupa” or whence comes the body or rupa?

Answer: If the process were given it would not be understood, since it is one for which our language has no words. It is for this reason that descriptions given by clairvoyants of various occult things seem pure twaddle and vague mutterings to those who for themselves cannot clairvoyantly see the same thing.

How could it be possible to describe the operations of the occult Cosmos in the terms of materialistic science and philosophy?

That hidden Cosmos is ideal in its fineness, and the very attempt to fully describe the process enquired of would convey only doubt and certainly result in confusion. But it is no more hidden than is the process by which the body builds itself up every day; nor than that by which a thought will affect the entire nervous system. A simple thought will bring a hot flush or a cold shiver. How?

No one knows. Certainly no scientific terms exist to describe the mode and means whereby the thought connects itself with the human physiological machine. And if this be so on this plane, is it likely that an Adept’s description of the coalescence of Kama with an astral body after death would be comprehended save in the most general way?

This general way may be gotten at by considering the action of the magnet. It attracts, but no scientific man can look behind that fact; it even can attract an electric flame, but there too the process is occult. In the same way there is an attraction between the mass of desires called Kama and the astral form which causes them to come together just as a similar attractive force brought Ego and body together.

But desires and passions are not intangible and subjective in the sense given by the question. They are in their sphere — though not in this — quite tangible and objective, and those two words must be altered when we pass beyond the consideration of this plane.

If the questioner insists that on every plane desires and passions are intangible and subjective, that will dispose of the question, because in such a case they certainly could never attract anything. But it will first have to be explained how such “intangible and subjective” things as passion and desire can and do have an objective effect even on this plane. As on their own plane they are full of force and tangibility, they attract to themselves the necessary quantum of astral matter, invisible to us but still there, to form a sheath of covering.

Having their center in the thinker they radiate from that and cause their effects until cut off from their center, when they begin to dissipate unless linked with some other center from which they might get activity. But the whole difficulty grows, it seems to me, out of the prevalent habit of regarding this so-called objective world as real, and forgetting that the mental and spiritual realms are the only real ones, this being simply the phenomenal expression of those.

I therefore disagree from the Editor when he says that such and such desires “are not existences apart from the mind and capable of assuming an objective form,” for I think they are just such existences and have the capacity to take on an objective form.

He is simply stating modern conceptions, which are wholly erroneous and springing from a system of philosophy which does not know that the mind is an entity, and while his illustrations are all good for the school to which they belong, they are completely negatived by the facts of Occultism. For instance, if a practitioner of magic — and not a very high one either — were to fix in his mind the image of an object, it would soon become objective to our physical senses, just as it was first in fact objective to our inner senses.

This could not be possible if the objective and subjective of one plane are forever on every plane subjective and objective. That which we now from this plane call “abstract qualities” change on another plane into “objective things.” So I regard it an error to call the desire and passions abstract qualities, unless we say at the same time that we mean it relatively.
(Echoes of the Orient II, p.337-9)







Kama-rupas and spiritualism

When a man dies and is buried his kamic body is released. The life principle is also released from these atoms to go into others. Then the kamic body, with all the passions and desires is set free. We will suppose the case of a suicide. His kamic body escapes full of the idea of suicide.

Similarly, the man who has indulged in drinking and all sorts of sensualities, goes out full of these things. A murderer who is hung is in the same condition. Guiteau would go out full of that last scene where he defied his accusers, and where he declared he would destroy all the people who had anything to do with his incarceration.

What happens?

Man’s higher principles go on and on with evolution, finally being reincarnated. If after death these lower elements are seized by mediums and brought back to earth, infused with additional life, not permitted to disintegrate, it is a crime. Everyone who goes to a medium and asks that their dead may return commits a crime. It is a crime against the person who is dead, and against the medium; it brings around her bad influences, for the majority that can return are full of crime.

They are of the earth, earthy. Now, when I am dead my astral body will not have my senses; it will contain only my passions and desires, which swerve me as they swerve you also, and if I am drawn back against my will I may do harm. If you could actually see what occurs at a séance you would never go to another.

You would see all these vile shapes enveloping the sitters like a huge octopus [cf. BCW XIV:489-92]. Mediumship is nothing but communicating with the astral dead; it is the worship of the dead, and as such it has been condemned for ages.
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.191)






The kama-rupas communicating with the mediums

Hundreds of classes of beings communicate from the astral plane with the living through mediums and otherwise. Of this subject the West does not know. Hence you will have to take on faith if you believe at all what I reply. Many degrees of elementals communicate. These are all of no use to us, but harmful. Many of them are used by black magicians who live in the astral world in their kama-rupas.

They use the elementals, they live thus on the living by absorption, and this is the great danger of all such things. Some of them may be friendly, but unless you have the means and sight of your own to tell which, no direction would be of any use. Even while friendly they are injurious, for they must use a part of you or someone for the work, and they thus set up the likelihood of another not friendly using you the same way.
(Echoes of the Orient II, p.353)






The attraction of the kama-rupas to the animal kingdom

The student of the theosophic scheme admits that after death the astral soul either dies and dissipates at once, or remains wandering for a space in Kama-Loka. If the man was spiritual, or what is sometimes called “very good,” then his astral soul dissipates soon; if he was wicked and material, then the astral part of him, being too gross to easily disintegrate, is condemned, as it were, to flit about in Kama-Loka, manifesting itself in spiritualistic séance rooms as the spirit of some deceased one, and doing damage to the mental furniture of mortals while it suffers other pains itself.

Seers of modern times have declared that such eidolons or spooks assume the appearance of beasts or rep tiles according to their dominant characteristic. The ancients sometimes taught that these gross astral forms, having a natural affinity for the lower types, such as the animal kingdom, gravitated gradually in that direction and were at last absorbed on the astral plane of animals, for which they furnish the sidereal particles needed by them as well as by man.

But this in no sense meant that the man himself went into an animal, for before this result had eventuated the ego might have already reentered life with a new physical and astral body. The common people, however, could not make these distinctions, and so very easily held the doctrine as meaning that the man became an animal.

After a time the priests and seers took up this form of the tenet and taught it outright. It can be found in the Desatīr (the Sacred Writings of the Ancient Persian Prophets), where it is said that tigers and other ferocious animals are incarnations of wicked men, and so on. But it must be true that each man is responsible and accountable for the fate of his astral body left behind at death, since that fate results directly from the man’s own acts and life.
(Echoes of the Orient II, p.420-1)






Ordinary kama-rupas and particular kama-rupas

Several students failed to discriminate between what may be called the normal and the abnormal kama-rupa. The queries related to the latter only, as the normal or ordinary kama-rupa does not cohere for centuries after the death of the body. Almost all the replies were from Western students; it would seem as if those of the East had not given their attention to this matter.

When the body dies “the remains of Antaḥkaraņa survive as kama-rupa” [Voice, p. 89, TUP ed.], and the normal kama-rupa being thus formed, the usual result is that after the kama-rupa has been dissipated in Kama-Loka into the Taṇhic Elementals, the Higher Ego enters the state of Devachan.

But should the tendencies and desires of the past life have been almost exclusively animal and material in nature, the stronger and more coherent will be the Kama-Rupa, the less the length of time to be passed in Devachan, and the quicker the reincarnation of the Higher Ego. Even in this case, the kama-rupa will have been dissipated as such previous to the reincarnation of the Higher Ego, although it may have cohered for a very long time.

But in the abnormal cases, previous to the death of the body, a separation is effected between the “Higher Ego” and the “Kamic” or “Personal Soul.” In such a case the Higher Ego may be led back again by spiritual aspiration, when no permanent separation takes place.

But should the union not be effected, the Kamic or Personal Soul becomes a separate Entity, to reincarnate immediately as a human animal and scourge. Depending upon its Karmic energy it exists for centuries as such, undergoing torments in more and more debased incarnations: it is ultimately doomed to annihilation and to “fade out in Myalba.” Occasionally it may thus endure for centuries, and yet fade out previous to the reincarnation of the Higher Ego.

If the degradation during the life in which the separation occurred, has been sufficiently intense, or if it has “become immortal in Satan,” i.e. in spiritual evil, the Kamic Soul is not re-born, but remains in an active state of Avīchi within the terrestrial aura.

(The kama-rupa becomes a dweller of the threshold, that is, an evil astral entity that is going to harass the new incarnated personality.)

In both cases the Kamic Soul is ultimately doomed to annihilation after a period which varies with the energy inherent in it.

Its effect on the Reincarnating Ego may be very great. That Ego is led by Karma back to a new series of incarnations. It evolves from itself a new Kama-Manasic reflection, which is at once warred with by the Kama-Manasic spook either reincarnated as a soulless entity, or especially if in a state of Avīchi within the terrestrial aura.

The attraction between the “father” or Higher Ego and the doomed “son” or Kama-Manas is very great, and the latter endeavors to force its way into “the astral current and through the Auric Envelope of the new tabernacle of its Parent Ego, declaring war to the lower light” [cf. 636] — the Kama-Manas newly evolved to replace it. It is thus a “Dweller on the Threshold” to the Parent Higher Ego.

In addition to thus affecting the parent Ego this kama-rupa declares war on all humanity, preying on the living, such as sensitives, mediums, and all others to whom it is magnetically attracted; through this it vicariously satisfies its gross desires [see BCW XII:632-40].

Many members have asked how the new personality can be formed for the separated Higher Ego when it reincarnates, as it seems to them that there can be no personality remaining. The new personality is formed and evolved from other Atoms within the Auric Egg, wherein Karmic records exist from all eternity. No one personality gives manifestation to all such Karmic atoms. The evil personality is dropped from the Sutratma and the Reincarnating Ego, provided it resists the “Dweller,” proceeds in obedience to the Law.
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.352-3)






A kama-rupa can become a threshold dweller

Question: R.C. said that kama-rupa becomes a form, as such, and distinct from the body, only after death of the physical. If a human being lives and dies without a thought higher than an animal one, or is essentially depraved and evil, his kama-rupa becomes a Dweller on the Threshold and I would say becomes the evil genius of the man.

The Divine Ego would reincarnate again with a new personality. But at this point I am not clear. It seems difficult, well nigh impossible, to escape from the kama principle. To me it is marvelous that H.P.B. has such a vast amount of knowledge. It is not possible for me to grasp it except a little now and then. But such is karma and it is just.


Answer: “R.C.” is partially right. We find that kama-rupa — formed after death — may become so dense and compact as to last in the astral light for many years if the late departed was a very gross person, full of earthly desires unsatisfied. Hence there is quite a possibility that this persistent kama-rupa may become an “evil genius” for the next personality assumed by the Ego.

The reason is that the particles of which it is composed have an affinity (growing out of impressions made in the last life, and all of the magnetic attractions established), for the Ego who cast them off at the time of death. The only appropriate channel for exhausting the energies centered in kama-rupa is through the Ego who brought them into existence.


There is also another way in which these degraded kama-rupas may be attracted to a person. It is done by those who attend spiritualistic séances or who engage in “ghost hunting” in any way. If they persistently indulge in this — as many do — they set up similar magnetic currents to those above mentioned.

These currents are attached to some dead man’s kama-rupa and if the latter be a long lived one then on the next rebirth of the “ghost hunter” the kama-rupa — still floating in the astral light — is irresistibly attracted to the one who thus sets up the magnetic attraction, and invades his waking as well as sleeping hours.

This is especially so in cases where the so-called spirit husbands and wives are obtained through mediums. There the attraction set up is of the strongest possible character. If it grows out of the strongest element in our character and feeds upon the most powerful ones in the “spook,” on the next rebirth of these dabblers in such moral pitch, the kama-rupa bride or groom, outlasting the other’s Devachan, flies to its natural friend and becomes in effect a demon.

These demon is not the theological devil, but an automatic thing with no conscience, but firmly attached to the person through natural affinities and liable to drag down the unfortunate sinner who thus deliberately incurred such results. This is one reason why in the E.S. the attending of séances or “sitting for mediumship” is prohibited. There are also many other reasons.
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.330-1)





The kama-rupa of the adepts

Question: Is any kama-rupa formed in a case where union is made with the Higher Self?

Answer: Yes, there is, except where Nirvana is taken. The Higher Adept has and uses a kama-rupa, which is often called Mayavi-Rupa when acting in a certain way. But the kama-rupa in this case is a different sort of one from those of ordinary men. It is high and refined and harmless. It represents the purest essence of the material nature, and is absolutely needed to work in and with nature.

Students have, so far, only considered that phase of kama-rupa which is connected with this plane of gross experience. Kama is a general principle, and therefore also having gradations of high and low, fine and coarse, and so on. Understood thus, difficulties should disappear; but further discussion is still in order.
(Echoes of the Orient III, p.385)