Djwal Khool was the main disciple
that we know of Master Kuthumi and many people believe that Djwal Khool was Tibetan, but this is false as I am going to show you below.
THE MAHATMA LETTERS
We know of
the existence of Djwal Khool essentially through the mentions made of him in
the epistolary correspondence that the masters Kuthumi and Morya had with the
Englishmen Alfred Sinnett and Alan Hume.
In that
correspondence it is not specified the Djwal Khool’s nationality, but there are
several details that make us consider that Djwal Khool was an Indian.
For example,
Djwal Khool often accompanied his teacher Kuthumi because Djwal Khool spoke
English very well, and this was specified by Blavatsky:
« With D.K. I also spoke English, he speaking it better even than Mahatma
K.H. »
(ML
140, p.478)
If Djwal Khool
spoke English very well, it doesn't make sense that he was Tibetan, because
Tibet at the end of the 19th century was a much closed country where it was extremely
difficult for Westerners to visit, and therefore there were very few Tibetans
who knew the English language.
But instead
if it makes more sense to consider that Djwal Khool was Indian since India at
that time was a colony of the British Empire and English was widely taught to
the Indians.
Another
example is that Master Kuthumi used to refer to Djwal Khool in a friendly way
with the pseudonym of "The Disinherited", for example in the letter
he sent to Mr. Sinnett in February 1881, the master wrote:
« I, being far away from home, and at a place where a stationer's shop is less
needed than breathing air, our correspondence threatens to break very abruptly,
unless I manage my stock in hand judiciously. A friend promises to supply me in
case of great need with a few stray sheets, memento relics of his grandfather's
will, by which he disinherited him and thus made his "fortune." »
(ML
8, p.33)
And here
again it makes no sense that if Djwal Khool was Tibetan, his grandfather would
have disinherited him since at that time in Tibet it was a great honor for
young people to enter some Tibetan monastery.
But instead
if it makes more sense than if his grandfather was Indian, he would have been
upset when Djwal Khool renounced his Indian religion to go live in Tibet.
And you also
have to consider that both, Master Kuthumi and Master Morya, were Indians.
OLCOTT'S TESTIMONY
Colonel
Olcott specified that Djwal Khool was an Indian:
« The next evening, after the visits to Mr. Brown and
myself, we two and Damodar sat in my tent, at 10, o'clock, waiting for an
expected visit from Master K. H. The camp was quiet, the rest of our party
dispersed through the city of Lahore. We sat on chairs at the back of the tent
so as not to be observed from the camp: the moon was in its last quarter and
had not risen.
After some waiting we heard and saw a tall Hindu
approaching from the side of the: open plain. He came to within a few yards of
us and beckoned Damodar to come to him, which he did. He told him that the
Master would appear within a few minutes, and that he had some business with
Damodar. It was a pupil of Master K. H. Presently we saw the latter coming from
the same direction, pass his pupil—who had withdrawn to a little distance.
. . .
When I was writing my Diary: the pupil lifted the
portiére, beckoned to me, and pointed to the figure of his Master, waiting for me
out on the plain in the starlight. »
(Old
Diary Leaves III, p.44)
BLAVATSKY'S TESTIMONY
Colonel
Olcott did not specify that this Master Kuthumi’s disciple was Djwal Khool, but
Madame Blavatsky did, she wrote in The
Theosophist magazine, December 1883:
«
This time
Master Kuthumi was also accompanied in his physical body by his disciple Djwal Khool.
»
(p.86)
BROWN'S TESTIMONY
And this was
also confirmed by a young Scotsman named William Tournay Brown who was present
at that meeting and who in a pamphlet that he later published recounting the
experiences he had in India, he narrated the following:
« On the evening of November 21,
1883, after the conference, Colonel Olcott, Damodar and I were sitting outside
the shamiana (which is an open-roofed pavilion covered with bamboo
mats), when we were visited by Djwal Khool, who is one of Master Kuthumi's
disciples, and he informed us that his master was about to arrive. And so it
was, the master approached us, greeted us, gave instructions to Damodar and
then left. »
(Some
Experiences in India, London Lodge of the Theosophical Society, 1884)
THEN WHY DO THEY SAY DJWAL
KHOOL IS TIBETAN?
Well, this is due to all the
misrepresentation that occurred later, as I am going to show you below.
THE FALSE THAT LEADBEATER INVENTED
Charles
Leadbeater was a charlatan who pretended to be in contact with the masters, but
ignoring the information I gave you above, he claimed that Djwal Khool was of
Tibetan origin, and that is why in his book “The Masters and the Path”, he wrote:
« His face is distinctly Tibetan in
character, with high cheek bones, and is somewhat rugged in appearance, showing
signs of age. »
(Chapter
2)
THE DISSEMINATION DID BY BAILEY
Later Alice Bailey
was another charlatan who claimed to be a Master Kuthumi’s disciple and to have
been telepathically instructed by Djwal Khool to write her books. And Alice
Bailey, as she did not know the information that I put above, she read
Leadbeater's book and accepted the lie that Djwal Khool was Tibetan, and that
is why she called him "The Tibetan".
In her book
“Human and Solar Initiation”, she
described it as follows:
« The Master Djwhal Khul, or the
Master D. K. as He is frequently called, is another adept on the second Ray of
Love-Wisdom. He is the latest of the adepts taking initiation, having taken the
fifth initiation in 1875, and is therefore occupying the same body in which He
took the initiation, most of the other Masters having taken the fifth
initiation whilst occupying earlier vehicles. His body is not a young one, and
He is a Tibetan. »
(Chapter
6)
And in her “The Unfinished
Autobiography”, Bailey added the following:
« The Tibetan's style has improved
over the years. He dictated a cumbersome, poor English in the beginning, but
between us we have managed to work out a style and presentation which is suited
to the great truths which it is His function to reveal, and mine and my
husband's to bring to the attention of the public. »
(p.167)
But this is
false since, as I demonstrated above, Blavatsky specified that Djwal Khool spoke
English very well.
THE
ASCENDED MASTERS TEACHINGS
The Ascended Masters organizations are also a bunch of charlatans which have mainly
relied on what Alice Bailey wrote to come up with their own "esoteric
teachings" and they have continued to spread the lie that Djwal Khool was Tibetan.
~*~
And this is one more example of how the existence of
the trans-Himalayan masters has been distorted over time through more and more
liars.
No comments:
Post a Comment