Notice: I have written in other languages, many interesting articles that you
can read translated in English
in these links:
Part 1 and Part 2.


WAS DJWAL KHOOL THE NINTH PANCHEN LAMA?

 
 
 
This theory has been put forward by some researchers who are followers of Alice Bailey, and to affirm that they are based on the following facts:
 
1) The ex-Theosophist and later Arcane School student Annie Gowland painted the following portrait of Djwal Khool.
 
 
 
 
2) Gowland based her portrait on this photo:
 
 

 
 
3) And the man in the middle of this photo looks a lot like the 9th Panchen Lama, Thubten Choekyi Nyima:
 
 

 
And therefore they concluded that the ninth Panchen Lama was Djwal Khool "The Tibetan" who telepathically dictated the blue books to Alice Bailey.
 
 
 
But that is false because the books that Alice Bailey published are full of the falsehoods that the liar Charles Leadbeater invented, and instead those books have little of the teaching that the trans-Himalayan masters transmitted to the world through their disciples Helena Blavatsky and William Judge.
 
And therefore this is the greatest proof that The Tibetan did not exist, since it makes no sense that a high lama who was living in a monastery in Tibet would start copying the lies that an ex-Anglican priest had just invented to the other side of the world
 
But instead if it makes much more sense to consider that Alice Bailey not understanding the books that Blavatsky wrote (and neither did she having studied the books that William Judge wrote), she began to plagiarize what Charles Leadbeater wrote without knowing that this individual was a charlatan, and to give herself more prestige she claimed that a Tibetan Master had transmitted them to her telepathically.
 
Later Alice Bailey also claimed that The Tibetan was Djwal Khool, a former disciple of Master Kuthumi, but it turns out that Djwal Khool was not Tibetan but Indian. Which shows how ignorant and deceitful Alice Bailey was.
 
 
 
 
 
 
OBSERVATIONS
 
Several researchers believe that the photo I posted above was taken by explorer Nicolas Roerich. This is because that photo appeared in several newspaper articles when they talked about Nicolas Roerich's expedition to Tibet in 1928:
 




But this photo was taken in 1924 by the American explorer Aloha Wanderwell.
 
What happens is that to accompany the text, the newspapers also included other photographs of the Himalayan region.
 
The original photo is in the Detroit Public Library and is handwritten on the reverse: "Bhutan: type, the lamas (Kazi of Yokseem)".
 
About this photo, Tibetologist Glenn Mullin noted:
 
« Kazi is the title of a monk from an aristocratic family. According to one academic paper, there were 12 families allowed to use the title Kazi for a monk of their bloodline. I think only the person in the middle is a monk. The other two are probably aristocrat relatives because of their clothing.
 
The director of the National Museum in Bhutan writes, “Yokseem is in Sikkim, there is a huge lake having foot print of Guru Rinpoche on the surface of lake. That is not a Bhutanese monk. Bhutanese do not wear like this ankle length chupa (coat) and hat.”
 
So it seems that the photo is taken in Sikkim; or if it is taken in Bhutan, it is a photo of a Sikkimese monk and relatives visiting from Sikkim»
 
 
And therefore the man in the middle of this photo is not the 9th Panchen Lama.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment