This theory
has been put forward by some researchers who are followers of Alice Bailey, and
to affirm that they are based on the following facts:
1) The ex-Theosophist
and later Arcane School student Annie Gowland painted the following portrait of
Djwal Khool.
2) Gowland
based her portrait on this photo:
3) And the man
in the middle of this photo looks a lot like the 9th Panchen Lama, Thubten
Choekyi Nyima:
And therefore they concluded that the ninth Panchen
Lama was Djwal Khool "The Tibetan" who telepathically dictated the
blue books to Alice Bailey.
But that is
false because the books that Alice Bailey published are full of the falsehoods
that the liar Charles Leadbeater invented, and instead those books have little
of the teaching that the trans-Himalayan masters transmitted to the world
through their disciples Helena Blavatsky and William Judge.
And
therefore this is the greatest proof that The Tibetan did not exist, since it
makes no sense that a high lama who was living in a monastery in Tibet would
start copying the lies that an ex-Anglican priest had just invented to the
other side of the world
But instead
if it makes much more sense to consider that Alice Bailey not understanding the
books that Blavatsky wrote (and neither did she having studied the books that
William Judge wrote), she began to plagiarize what Charles Leadbeater wrote
without knowing that this individual was a charlatan, and to give herself more
prestige she claimed that a Tibetan Master had transmitted them to her
telepathically.
Later Alice
Bailey also claimed that The Tibetan was Djwal Khool, a former disciple of
Master Kuthumi, but it turns out that Djwal Khool was not Tibetan but Indian.
Which shows how ignorant and deceitful Alice Bailey was.
OBSERVATIONS
Several
researchers believe that the photo I posted above was taken by explorer Nicolas
Roerich. This is because that photo appeared in several newspaper articles when
they talked about Nicolas Roerich's expedition to Tibet in 1928:
But this
photo was taken in 1924 by the American explorer Aloha Wanderwell.
What happens
is that to accompany the text, the newspapers also included other photographs
of the Himalayan region.
The original
photo is in the Detroit Public Library and is handwritten on the reverse: "Bhutan: type, the lamas (Kazi of Yokseem)".
About this
photo, Tibetologist Glenn Mullin noted:
« Kazi is the title of a monk from an aristocratic family. According to
one academic paper, there were 12 families allowed to use the title Kazi for a
monk of their bloodline. I think only the person in the middle is a monk. The
other two are probably aristocrat relatives because of their clothing.
The director of the National
Museum in Bhutan writes, “Yokseem is in Sikkim, there is a huge lake
having foot print of Guru Rinpoche on the surface of lake. That is not a
Bhutanese monk. Bhutanese do not wear like this ankle length chupa (coat) and
hat.”
So it seems that the photo is
taken in Sikkim; or if it is taken in Bhutan, it is a photo of a Sikkimese monk
and relatives visiting from Sikkim. »
And therefore the man in the middle of this photo is
not the 9th Panchen Lama.
No comments:
Post a Comment