(Henry Bedinger Mitchell was a professor of mathematics at Columbia University
and a member of the Theosophical Society in America, and in this article he
summarizes the main aspects of the Theosophical Movement.)
Preface
A conception that is at once profound and simple rarely meets with
immediate comprehension. Our minds are so used to dealing with the complex
details of the map of life, they are so narrowly focused upon the particular,
that they miss the broad and general outlines and the significance of the
names, written in widely spaced letters, across its entire surface.
To see these a new perspective is needed, a certain aloofness of
attitude and a refocusing of our vision which require time and an act of will. So
it follows that there is usually an intermediate stage where but half the
larger letters are perceived, and their sequence seems meaningless or sheer
folly.
This is illustrated in the history of every great scientific or philosophic
or religious movement. It was the case with Darwinism, with the rediscovery and
restatement of that profound and simple doctrine of evolution which today illumines
our view of all Nature's processes, from the changes within an atom to the
formation of a solar system or the life of a human soul. Its scope was too
wide, its fundamental concept too simple, to be perceived at once.
A single bizarre detail was alone grasped by the popular mind, and for
years evolution meant to many only an apparently ridiculous or rather blasphemous
theory that man was the offspring of the ape.
It was the case with Berkeley's idealism. It was, and is, the case with
Christianity itself, the breadth of whose message is still hidden from us by
the narrowing lenses of Hebraic legalism through which its early disciples
viewed their Master's teaching. We
cannot wonder, therefore, that like misconceptions have surrounded the purposes
and principles upon which the Theosophical Society is based.
But however natural and inevitable these misconceptions may have been in
the early days of the Society, the perspective of over a third of a century of
consistent work gives little excuse for their continued existence. In this period
the guiding principles and methods of the Society have been applied to widely
varying fields of inquiry, and in these applications their significance and
scope have been revealed.
This is the way in which all general principles become clear to us. The
axioms and postulates of Geometry, for instance, seem mere platitudes when
given their bare abstract statement, but when consecutively applied to problem
after problem their meaning is brought home to us and we find that in their
simple seeming statements the whole science of Geometry is contained. It was by this means also that the
significance of the doctrine of evolution was learned. Now that it has been
applied and tested in the mineral and vegetable as well as in the animal
kingdoms, we perceive at once its simplicity and universal scope.
The same is true of the principles upon which the Theosophical Society
is founded, so that the self knowledge gained by repeated tests makes possible
today a clearer statement of its aims, methods and character, than could have
been given even by its most zealous adherents thirty years ago. For reasons
which will become obvious to the reader of this article, no such statement,
other than the very general one contained in the constitution of the Society,
can be authoritative or official. But as the Society's history speaks for
itself, and as sixteen years of intimate participation in its affairs and
councils enable me to write with at least the insight of personal knowledge, I
have ventured to hope that I may dispel some of the misunderstanding which
still surrounds its work.
1. The conditions in the world of thought
at the time the Theosophical Society was founded
To understand any movement it is necessary to have some knowledge of the
conditions in which it arose; and, in the case of the Theosophical Society,
this takes us back to the year 1875, a time when the thought of the West was
bitterly divided against exception, religious and scientific utterances.
Religion was dominated dogmatism, and bitterness which then marked, with scarcely
an itself. It is difficult for us to realize today the intense sectarianism, by
theology, and science by materialism, and the age-long antagonism between the
two had been fanned into the flame of fierce conflict by the spread of
Darwinism with its popular misconceptions, and by the new light which the natural
sciences had thrown upon the history of the earth.
The letter of the religious law had been so completely confused with or
substituted for its spirit, that to doubt a single theological tenet or the
literal accuracy of an ancient Hebraic text seemed to put the whole reality of
the religious life and nature in question; a question which the materialism of
science answered with a blatant and chill negation. Neutrality was impossible.
The choice seemed forced between the extremes of superstition and materialism, and,
in consequence, religion was left without vitality, without the sense of
immediate reality and the support of natural law. It seemed to concern only a
problematical future beyond the grave, and in the resulting spiritual lethargy
and indifference there grew the feeling that freedom to enjoy and to be
comfortable was the aim of life.
Science, on the other hand, was left without the assistance of a
philosophy which saw the universe whole and took law and unity into the inner
world of man's sentient life and consciousness. The tangible and the visible
absorbed its attention, and the law which it saw enthroned in the physical realm
found no recognition of dominion over the heart and destiny of man.
In this divided world and in the middle ground vacated by science and
theology alike, had arisen the spiritualistic movement with its vast mass of
remarkable phenomena, and the curious mixture of superstition and materialism
put forward in explanation. The movement had spread with astonishing rapidity,
and on every side men and women, ignorant of their dangers, were experimenting with
hypnotic and trance states, and developing mediumistic and abnormal psychic
conditions.
Laughed at by science, regarded as blasphemous by orthodox religion, yet
supported by an accumulation of testimony which could not be ignored, there was
nothing to guide or balance the popular interpretation of these phenomena, and
from them spread a concept of life after death as degrading to the soul as to
the intelligence of those who held it.
Such, in brief, was the condition of religious thought in Europe and
America. If we turn to the East, to India or Burma or Ceylon, we find a
situation different but no less serious. The material power and success of the
Western nations were diverting the East from its own truths. The fire of religious aspiration which had
given the world its greatest scriptures — for Christianity, too, is of the East,
not of the West — had burned low. The
East seemed to sleep, its energies and vitality indrawn and unused, and where
it stirred it was awakening to scepticism and unrest. It neither understood the
West nor was understood by it. It could neither give nor receive of the best. The old channels of its thought and laws were
broken and its life currents turning stagnant and bitter.
In a word both East and West, both religion and science, were suffering
from sectarianism — from the separation of truths which should have been
conjoined, from narrow, dogmatic misunderstandings and antagonisms. There was a
crying need for a common neutral meeting place where all beliefs and views of
life could come together.
2. The purposes for which the
Theosophical Society was founded
It was to meet this need that the Theosophical Society was founded. It
established an open platform where the adherents of all creeds and of none
could meet; where all views could come together and each could have full
hearing; where an open mind would be encouraged and points of agreement rather
than of disagreement might be found; where the West could be interpreted to the
East and the East to the West; where the science of religion and the religion
of science might learn each of the other's truth and of the greater truths
behind them both; where every view of life, every type of mind and nature,
might find sympathetic under standing and be helped to a deeper insight into
its own truth and genius; where outlawed views, heretical views, views that could
command no other hearing, could be given full expression and be judged, not
from prejudice, but from merit; where the divided thought of the world might be
fitted into the unity of Truth, and each facet find its proper place and part. It was, and is, an ideal infinitely ambitious,
but also eminently practical. Its ultimate goal may be, as is the goal of life
itself, forever beyond our reach, but the way to it was clear from the outset and
each step forward is so much sheer gain.
3. The Theosophical Society's
fundamental rules
It is clear that the success of such an undertaking must be dependent
upon the absolute freedom and impartiality of the platform the Society
maintained. Of itself it could have no creed, dogma, or personal authority to
enforce or impose. Neither could it be held responsible for the opinions of its
members. Its characteristics must be Breadth, Impartiality, Tolerance, Courtesy
and Sympathy. It could exclude no one, be committed to no one. Therefore the
first rule of membership, beyond that of sympathy with its chief purpose, is thus
phrased in its constitution:
- "Every
member has the right to believe or disbelieve in any religious system or
philosophy, and to declare such belief or disbelief without affecting his
standing as a member of the Society, each being required to show that tolerance
of the opinions of others which he expects for his own."
And in the By-Laws we find this further statement:
- "No
member of the Theosophical Society shall promulgate or maintain any doctrine as
being that advanced or advocated by the Society."
In these two rules are the indispensable and indisputable guarantees of the
freedom and impartiality of the Theosophical Society. In view of the strictness
with which they have been enforced, ignorance alone can account for the
impression, still lingering in the public mind, that it is a new religious sect
or “ism.”
4. A view of life and of truth
suggested by the establishment of an open platform
Behind and prompting all our acts lies some philosophy of life which
consciously or unconsciously is ours, and which is at once revealed and judged
by its fruits. There is truth as well as
humor in the assertion that, however pessimistic his books may be, no author was
ever at heart a pessimist. For no one
would write did he not believe his thought could influence others, and to
believe this is optimism pure and simple. Judged thus, the insistent silence of the Society,
as such, upon all matters of opinion and belief is eloquent of the philosophy
of spiritual freedom held by its founders.
Breadth and tolerance are readily confused with indifference, and the
open mind of the disciple, who has glimpsed the infinity of Truth, must often
meet the charge of agnosticism from those who have been trained to believe that
the whole meaning of life can be cramped into a single formula. But in the positive synthetic method of inquiry
and procedure, established by the Society, is the answer to such criticism, and
though each is free to interpret this method as he will, to me it appears a
testimony to the belief in the oneness of Life and of Truth.
That this philosophy of Unity and Spiritual Freedom was held by the
founders of the Society is a matter of abundant record. In no way is it imposed
upon the Society, but the purpose for which the Society was created is
clarified by its light. It is a belief that the Universe is one and that life
is whole; that the true self of each of us is one with the Self of the
Universe.
In Madame Blavatsky's fine phrase, it is the belief of "the fundamental
identity of all souls with the Universal Oversoul." Similarly it is a
belief that all truths are aspects and facets of the Truth; that nothing is
meaningless, nothing too humble or insignificant to have its part and place in
the great whole; that each has something to contribute. And from this it
follows that to reach toward the Truth, to grow in power and self-knowledge, is
to grow into a positive unity; the way to which is through sympathy and synthesis
and impersonality, looking always back through the veils of personality and
differences to the central flame of genius which lights all human minds.
5. The stated objects of the
Theosophical Society
The first stated object of the Society is expressive of this attitude
toward life and truth. It is thus phrased.
- "The
principal aim and object of this Society is to form the nucleus of a universal
brotherhood of humanity, without distinction of race, creed, sex, caste or
color."
It emphasizes the principle of spiritual unity and points the way to
growth through sympathy, synthesis, and an open mind.
- "The
subsidiary objects are: The study of ancient and modern religions, philosophies
and sciences, and the demonstration of the importance of such study; and the
investigation of the unexplained laws of nature and the psychical powers latent
in man."
The theosophical attitude of sympathy and synthesis, which, in the first
object, was to be applied to individual views, is, in the second, extended to
systems of thought. In it the Society entered upon the modern study of comparative
Religion, but with this distinction, that whereas too often in the schools the
chief stress is still laid on differences, in the Theosophical Society from its
inception the aim has been to discover the common part, to find those central
truths and laws of the soul life which are embodied in all religions, or to
which all point, as the spokes of a wheel point to the hub.
A very little of this study serves to demonstrate its importance; not
only through the new light which a sympathetic appreciation of other religions
throws upon one's own, but also through the revelation of the unanimity of
personal testimony which the seers and prophets, the saints and mystics of all
ages and of all races, have borne to the fundamental laws of the spiritual
life.
It is impossible to find the dawning truths of our own experience clearly
recorded in the hieroglyphs of ancient Egypt, in the Sanscrit of the
Upanishads, in the teachings of the Buddha, in the Gospel of Christ, in the
writings of Molinos and in the visions of the Bienheureuse Marguerite Marie,
without a deepening sense of their universal reality and profound significance.
And it is far easier to obey the promptings of our inner guidance when we know
the path along which it leads has been followed by the great of soul through
the countless centuries of the past.
Through this study also the genius of the East grows clearer to our
Western minds. We learn to see more than one side of the shield, and as we grow
in understanding we grow in humility and the power of helpfulness, in the twin powers
of giving and receiving. We learn that
all forms and facets of the Truth are true each in its own way and degree, and
that each is needed to supplement the others. So science needs philosophy and religion to
set its genius free, to carry it beyond the realm of the concrete and the visible
till its scope includes the whole of life. And religion in its turn needs
science needs above all that grave scientific spirit which puts all things to
the test of experiment and experience.
It is to this undeveloped scientific realm, where the subject of experimentation
escapes the balance and the scalpel, that the third object of the Society is
directed. In its adoption we see the same emphasis upon the wholeness of life,
the same open mind and receptiveness to what is elsewhere ignored, that
characterize the whole spirit of the Society.
With the investigation of the psychical powers in man came the ability
to offer many simpler and more rational explanations of the phenomena of
spiritualism than were then current, and as the finer forces of nature were
studied, both science and religion were profited, — religion to the extent that
the laws and powers of the inner life were seen to be the reflection of universal
laws and powers, and science to the extent that the energies of the ether were
recognized as the source of all physical energy.
6. The theosophic attitude
These are the stated objects of the Society. Sympathy with the first
alone is required of its members, for this constitutes an intellectual attitude
toward life, — a turning toward the center — without which the work of the
Society is meaningless and impossible. It
is the attitude of open-minded sympathy and tolerance, of willingness to give
and to receive, to profit from others as well as seeking to profit them. All
who are willing to adopt this attitude are eligible for membership. They may
hold any beliefs or disbeliefs. Their
explanations of why this attitude is desirable or necessary may be infinitely
various. They are committed to nothing in joining the Society save to sympathy
with this first object and to the intellectual attitude it implies.
7. The theosophic method
If, holding this attitude, they desire to put it into practice and to
take part in the work of the Theosophical Society, they find a practical method
for its accomplishment. It is the method of free discussion in the spirit of
sympathy, courtesy and tolerance, each member contributing to the discussion,
each willing to listen. It is the method following as the logical consequence of
the theosophic attitude that all truth is valuable, and that every view has
some significance.
It presupposes that the essential element of inquiry and discussion is not
the relative importance of this or that individual view and fragment of the
truth, but the whole which is revealed as these views are synthesized and the
fragments placed together. Therefore the
discussions seek unities and not differences. But each opinion, however
apparently at variance with the rest, must find some place in that unity, —
must be given full and free opportunity for expression.
This method cannot be long practiced without the realization that one's
own truth is not that fragmentary portion of opinion which is at any time
cramped into our personal consciousness, but is some thing far larger and more
symmetric; and we find its different aspects reflected back to us from the
minds of others — enriching, widening, and clarifying our previous conceptions.
The subjects of discussion to which this method is applied are widely
various. But as the method is one of synthesis, pointing always to the center,
the subjects chosen habitually bear some relation to the source and seat of unity
— to the spiritual life in which all souls find their oneness, or to the finer
forces of nature of which the physical forces are differentiated
transformations.
The Theosophical Society is not a mere debating club. The theosophic
method is applied not only to the discussions at its Branch meetings, but also
with great fruitfulness to the studies of its members. It furnishes an approach
to a subject of study, and gives emphasis to fundamentals rather than to
details. It is an impersonal method and its use helps to free us from
preconceptions and to focus our attention wholly upon the search for truth.
The theosophic attitude and method constitute the outer aspect and life of
the Theosophical Society. If they are adopted and persistently employed they
lead to something further in its members, something which, ethically, is a
spirit and, religiously, a life. But upon these we cannot now dwell.
8. The history of the Theosophical
Society
The Theosophical Society was founded in New York City on November 17,
1875, by Madame Blavatsky, Mr. Judge, Colonel Olcott, and others, upon the principles
and with the objects out lined above; the idea for such a society having been
suggested by Madame Blavatsky, in conversation with Mr. Judge, on September 9th
of the same year.
The name of the society was derived from the Greek Theosophia, meaning literally divine wisdom, or wisdom of divine
things, if to our understanding of the word wisdom we add the notion that it is
applied, or put in practice; for this distinguishes the Greek sophia from gnosis or knowledge. Its title therefore suggests that the Society
is not only to seek spiritual knowledge, but to put that knowledge into
practice and use. The name has a long history, having been given to certain
schools of philosophy in Egypt, and among the Neo-Platonists and Gnostics.
The Society adopted as its motto: "There is no religion higher than Truth," which is said to have
been the ancient family motto of the Maharajas of Benares. Thus the name of the
Society comes to us through Greece and Egypt, and its motto from India.
The liberality, open mindedness, and scientific devotion to truth manifested
by the Society, as well as the gifted personality of Madame Blavatsky, soon
attracted a wide circle of brilliant intellect.
As was also to be expected, it drew genius whose orbit could not be
calculated in advance, and many who could not elsewhere obtain a hearing. All
were accorded complete freedom, fullness of opportunity, and perfect tolerance.
Local branches were organized for regular meetings and for putting in
practice the theosophic method. Such branches were established in the chief
cities of America, in England, Germany, Austria, Italy, Spain, Norway and
Sweden, in India, Australia and South America, so that nearly every nationality
and form of belief were represented on its rolls.
Magazines were started, through which the researches of the members
might be made known and shared by others. A search through the early volumes of
these publications shows the widest variety of topic. Christianity, Buddhism, Brahmanism,
Confucianism, Taoism, forgotten and obscure religious teachings, old philosophies
banned as heretical by the early church; the phenomena of spiritualism,
hypnotism, psychometry, clairvoyance, clairaudience, and mediumship;
discussions and speculations upon ethnology and the early history of the human
race; the application of the doctrine of evolution to religion and to the soul
of man; new and original theories of the constitution of matter and of broader scientific
principles — many of them anticipating recent discoveries — all these and many
more were treated in their pages.
9. A scheme of life presented by Madame
Blavatsky
and called Theosophy
But most interesting of all, because of widest sweep and most profound
conception, was the scheme of life — philosophy, science, and religion — put
forward by Madame Blavatsky herself and as her contribution to the general
symposium. The fundamental principles of this scheme were the same as those we
have seen suggested as prompting the formation of the Society.
It is not easy to summarize, even in crudest outline. It involved and
stressed the unity of the Universe; the fundamental identity of all souls with
the Oversoul; the universality of law; an endless evolution through recurring
cycles of birth and death, guided by the laws of cause and effect, — an
evolution in which man, as we know him, is by no means in the foremost rank;
the growth of consciousness toward the enduring realization of its deeper self
in a central unity; the view of all manifested things as differentiated aspects
of one Reality, of all truths as reflections of the one Truth — so that all
religions yield their greatest truth as we look back through them to what they
image.
This Madame Blavatsky called Theosophy, associating it with the earlier
systems that had borne that name and whose essential characteristics were the
same. If we turn to the dictionary, seeking a brief statement of these characteristics
we shall be told that "Theosophy differs from Philosophy in that it starts
from a transcendental apprehension of divinity to explain the manifested universe,
and does not generalize from phenomena to the being and attributes of
God"; and that "it differs from Mysticism in that it does not content
itself with the relations of the soul to God, but speculates on the
constitution and course of nature."
10. This scheme to be tested by
experience
It is thus that Euclidean Geometry proceeds from its general axioms to
their detailed applications. No explanation is given of the origin of these
axioms. The test of their validity is in
the consistency of the results which flow from them. Such also must be the test
of all theosophical postulates and systems — the test of experiment, the test
of the consistency and accuracy of the results which follow their application
to the world as it may be known to experience.
In view of this test the distinction between sophia, as applied wisdom, and gnosis,
as knowledge, is doubly significant.
If this method of reasoning from universals to particulars is not that
by which philosophic and scientific generalizations are made, it is at least
the method by which science and philosophy, as well as religion, are taught. The student of chemistry is not made to travel
the long and painful path by which its laws were first discovered. These laws
are stated to him one by one, and he is led to test and verify them.
He is not asked to believe in advance of the experiment, he is only told
what results he should expect and where to look for the significance of what is
occurring before his eyes. And yet a certain faith is demanded of him, for without
some measure of faith the teacher's guidance would not be followed and the
crucial experiment not performed.
This is quite clear to us in the teaching of physical science, where we
can perceive that the teacher has a deeper knowledge than our own. But in the
science of life itself, in the grave and serious alchemy of the soul, it is
harder to trust. For here our own hearts and natures are the materials of
experimentation, and we are slow to recognize that there are those who have a
deeper knowledge of life than we yet share.
If our view of human evolution were directed more to what man is
becoming, than to those lower forms through which his organism has passed, it
would be easier for us to believe that there are beings and sentient life beyond
and above as well as below us.
This was a cardinal point in Madame Blavatsky's philosophy, and if we
could appreciate its significance we should understand better the method
adopted by all religious teachers, who teach "As one having
authority" and yet say "My doctrine is not mine, but His that sent
me," and who bid us "Be perfect, even as your Father in Heaven is
perfect." It is through Madame Blavatsky's fullness of belief in the
existence of spiritual teachers, in the continued presence in the world of
"just men made perfect," that we may find the origin and explanation of
her religious, philosophic and scientific system.
11. Theosophy in its larger sense
beyond formal definition
To the exposition of this scheme of life Madame Blavatsky directed the
greater part of her prodigious literary activity. By every means at her command
she sought to direct men's minds toward it, pointing out unities of belief in
all spiritual teaching, showing how each fitted into the skeleton plan she
submitted, revealing meanings lying beneath the surface and within the words, challenging
accepted scientific theories here, strengthening others there, correlating, synthesizing,
retranslating and reinterpreting ancient scriptures, until Theosophy appeared
as the foundation of them all. But never did she claim either to have
originated what she offered, or that her own exposition did more than point the
way.
To her Theosophy was always beyond definition or formal statement. It
was rather an attitude, a looking toward and growth toward the truth. In her
conception truth was infinite and could only be known, unveiled and
undistorted, by the soul which shares in infinitude. It could not be cramped
and confined in words or offered as a formula to a narrow mind.
12. The many expositions of Theosophy
and the dual sense in which the term is used
But even if incapable of being fully depicted, as a sphere cannot be
mapped without distortion upon a plane, its fundamental principles and their
applications could be at least partially elucidated. Many books, articles and pamphlets were
written; approaching the subject, in accordance with the Society's method, from
many different points of view.
Among the more important of these works were the four ponderous and
erudite volumes of Madame Blavatsky's Isis
Unveiled and The Secret Doctrine,
and her shorter and popular Key to
Theosophy, as well as Mr. Sinnet's Occult
World and Esoteric Buddhism, and Mr. Judge's Ocean of Theosophy. At the same time, or shortly following them,
appeared a number of more personal treatises, such as Light on the Path, The Voice
of the Silence and Mr. Judge's edition of the Bhagavad Gita, in which the same broad principles were applied to
the individual life, and where directions were given which would test their
validity.
As this expository literature multiplied, the name "Theosophy"
came to be used in a two-fold sense. Chosen originally to designate those
central truths, from which, in Madame Blavatsky's view, all religions were
derived and to which all pointed, it became associated more particularly with
her own attempts at its exposition. In the primary and literal sense of
"wisdom of divine things," Theosophy denoted equally the wisdom of
Christianity and of Buddhism and of science; standing for a synthesis beyond
verbal formulation, but whose existence was perceivable through the theosophic
attitude and method.
In the secondary sense it was applied specifically to the new effort to restate
and reinterpret certain elements of this synthesis. As a matter of fact we each
of us use the word "truth" with precisely the same dual significance,
meaning thereby both the universal truth in its infinite wholeness, and also
that fragmentary and distorted portion of it which at any moment seems to us true
opinion. To members of the Society,
trained in the theosophic attitude and method, where truth is sought through
synthesis, and all formal statements are regarded as but partial, this duality
of meaning presented no difficulty. But to the world at large it has been a
source of much confusion.
13. The Theosophical Society neither was nor is committed to Theosophy
or to any other system of thought
Because of its consistency and wide scope, and also because of Madame
Blavatsky's personal power and genius, her view of life won many adherents,
both within and without the Theosophical Society. But — save to the extent that
the fundamental concepts of this system are reflected also in the stated
objects of the Society's constitution — the Theosophical Society is no more
committed to Theosophy than to Buddhism or Christianity or spiritualism or
modern science. All of these were discussed and elaborated and elucidated, in
books and articles and branch meetings, as was Theosophy.
All kinds of theories were presented and championed with the full power
of those who held them, and with the fullest freedom of opportunity accorded by
the Society. Each member was free to believe what he pleased, and if many
believed in Madame Blavatsky's philosophy, so also did many believe in the
views which the spiritualists then advocated. And where these systems differed
and contradicted one another in certain fundamental particulars, each member
made his own judgment. If more adopted the views of Madame Blavatsky, it was because
these views seemed to them more illuminating; perhaps because of Madame Blavatsky's
power as an expositor, perhaps because her exposition came nearer to the truth.
14. Freedom of individuality the key
to the Theosophical Society's history
It is in this absolute freedom of individuality, in the fundamental rules
embodied in the constitution of the Theosophical Society, — that every member
can believe or disbelieve in what he will, that no member can commit the
Society to any form of belief or disbelief and that all views and all members
are entitled to a full and respectful hearing, — that the key to the Society's
history is found. Brilliant genius, great personalities, have arisen within it.
Views of the most profound wisdom and the crassest folly have been advocated
from its platform. Each has been given opportunity to prove what it was, — and
the Society and the world have profited thereby.
15. Madame Blavatsky's psychic
phenomena
One of the most common sources of the misconception that has surrounded
the Society lies in the psychic phenomena which Madame Blavatsky exhibited on
numerous occasions. Even by those who recognize the wisdom of giving courteous
attention to all views of life, it is often asked why hospitality was accorded
to these; why such a scheme of life as Theosophy should have been confused by
association with the materialization of tea-cups and portraits, the
precipitation of letters, or the transportation of material objects through
space without apparent physical contact.
The answer, from the point of view of the Society, is that Madame
Blavatsky was what she was. They were her phenomena, not the Society's. Within the
Society her brilliant genius, her psychic gifts of a very remark able order,
her great personal force and many personal peculiarities had free scope, — as
had the genius and peculiarities of all other members. What her personal motives
were, what her personal acts were, what her personal character was, could be of
no official concern to the Theosophical Society. Whatever they were, as a
member she had full right to them.
Right or wrong, her views were entitled to a courteous hearing, and full
liberty was due her to present and support them in her own way. Each member
could agree or disagree, approve or disapprove in his personal capacity. But
the Society as such could do neither. The Society explicitly declines all
responsibility for the views of its members. Its brotherhood is without distinction
and wholly impersonal, in order that individuality may have full freedom.
If it be the opinion of the querent that these phenomena were trivial
and unworthy the expositor of such a philosophy as Madame Blavatsky put forth,
— or if again they be regarded as impossible, and those who believe in them
credulous dupes, — then still the answer of the Society is the same: Such
considerations do not concern us. Accept the phenomena or reject them. Whatever
your decision it does not affect the Society. Nor yet does it affect the truth
or falsity of her view of life. This stands quite apart from personality and
must be judged upon its own merits. Does it explain life and the world as you
know them? Does it appear to you as
true? Does it meet your tests of truth?
If so, accept it. If not, reject it. Or accept in part and reject in part.
The Theosophical Society knows nothing of personalities.
But if the question be differently phrased, and directed, not to the
Society, but to the personal opinion of some individual student, as to why such
bizarre methods were adopted by Madame Blavatsky and these phenomena produced,
then perhaps the querent might be reminded of the conditions in the thought of
the world at the time the Society was founded. With these conditions we have
dealt already, and it will be remembered that spiritualism was then a rising
tide in Europe and America, supported by a vast mass of phenomenal testimony
whose offered explanations were shot through and through with superstition and
materialism.
Madame Blavatsky hated superstition with all the intensity of her
uncompromising character. To her all was law, and these phenomena but the manifestation
of laws not yet generally understood, the action of finer forces of nature. She
set out to prove that she could herself repro duce all the phenomena of
spiritualism by the action of forces which, though supernormal, in the sense of
being latent rather than developed in the majority of men, were by no means
supernatural.
This, we might be told, was her aim, and that to fair-minded judges the evidence
proved her point. For all that Mrs. Piper and Eusapia Palladino and the
investigators of psychic phenomena are doing today, Madame Blavatsky did a
quarter of a century ago, adding to the production of the phenomena an
explanation of their rationale which many have found logically consistent and
intelligible.
Or again we might be told that in support of her effort to turn men's
minds back to the reality and power of the inner world, and in her emphasis
upon the potency of the finer forces of nature, it was valuable, indeed
necessary, to give tangible demonstrations of the action of these forces. Let
us for a moment, our informant might say, place ourselves in her position, and
assume that we share her burning conviction, born of personal experience, that
the long line of seers and mystics who had met their Master face to face, in vision
or in daily intercourse, were not deluded; that Christ and Krishna and the
Buddha, and all the greatest of all the past, had indeed entered into
immortality, still lived and worked for men, to be known of those who loved
them and who kept their commandments.
Let us assume that we, too, had experienced the fulfillment of this promise,
and that, because of it, knowledge and power which were none of ours, save as
they took the color of our minds in passing through them, could be given by us to
the world. Imagine ourselves thus, profoundly sensible of our great
responsibility, setting forth upon our mission, alone, friendless, and without
funds. Then let each ask what he would do, where and how he could obtain a hearing.
For that cannot be given which will not be received. And to receive, a
measure of faith is needed; not the blind faith of unquestioning belief, but
that faith which leads to faithful trial and test. How win this faith from
those who "have Moses and the Prophets" and hear them not? Would not we also have to show some sign of the
power which such discipleship can command?
16. The Theosophical Society's impartiality
and impersonality
demonstrated in its history
But whatever personal answer might conceivably be given by one or
another of its members, the answer of the Society itself would be unchanged.
The full liberty of its members to present their views in the way that seems best
to them, the complete impersonality and impartiality of the Society as such,
cannot be curtailed or abrogated.
These principles of complete individual freedom and official
impartiality have been demonstrated continuously through out the Society's
history. Again and again some member of unusual personal force and brilliancy
has won by these gifts a large following within the Society's ranks. So long as
such acceptance of leadership or of opinion is a matter of voluntary personal
belief, it is as it should be.
The Society's platform may be likened to the central tables in a great
library upon which, in innumerable papers, the news of the spiritual world is
spread. Each member is free to choose what he will and to accept what he will —
and for this purpose was each such paper laid there, that to each might be
given the widest possible opportunity for effect and usefulness. But when any member,
or any faction, seeks to commit the Society as such to any view, to any belief,
or to any person, then that member or faction is in conflict with the
fundamental principles upon which the Society is established, and by this
conflict is separated from its organism.
17. Mrs. Besant's conflict with
these principles
This was the case with Mrs. Besant, — also a woman of brilliant gifts,
of great personal force, and many personal peculiarities. Departing from the
fundamental principle of tolerance, she accused a fellow member, Mr. Judge, of deliberate
misrepresentation in stating the sources of certain letters. As a matter of
private personal opinion she was entitled to hold what view she pleased both as
to the origin of these letters and of Mr. Judge. But when she made this view
the basis of formal accusations of bad faith before the governing body of the
Society, and sought to compel this body to institute a formal trial of Mr.
Judge and decide between her view and his, she not only violated the primary rule
of tolerance, but placed herself in conflict with the fundamental principles of
individual freedom and the impartiality and impersonality of the Society's constitution.
Mr. Judge took his stand squarely on these principles. He refused
utterly to explain or defend his view before such a court, contending that it
was a question of his personal opinion, and, right or wrong, concerned the
Society not at all. Should the Society as such try him formally, it would commit
itself to one or another of two perfectly definite beliefs. It would not matter
what judgment was rendered; any decision, other than that of lack of
jurisdiction, would destroy the free and impartial character of the
Theosophical Society. Each member was free to believe or disbelieve in his
views, or to hold what opinion of him each might deem just, but the Society as
such could not commit itself. The weight of this argument was immediately
recognized, and the formal court of inquiry, which Mrs. Besant had sought to
institute, was abandoned.
If it be asked today: "Were these letters from the source Mr. Judge
claimed?" the reply, from the point of view of the Theosophical Society,
must be precisely that upon which he himself insisted. It is impossible for the
Society, as a Society, to pass judgment. Even if the personal opinion of some
individual member were sought, a like confession of incompetence might be
evoked. But by none who knew Mr. Judge's sterling honesty and life long devotion
to the search for truth, would his personal sincerity and integrity be
questioned ; and there are many, cognizant of the facts and trained in
discrimination, who would answer with an unqualified affirmative:
- "Yes.
For myself I know of my own knowledge, and am entirely convinced."
Yet the circumstances, and Mrs. Besant's nature, were such that suspicion
and calumny took deep hold upon her, and, persisting in them and in her
accusations, she and her following departed from the fundamental principles of
the Society's life, and thus, though still using its name, separated themselves
from its living organism. The orbit of
her personal genius passed without the Society, carrying in its train — to
psychic investigation and to a crystallized sectarian philosophy, — a large
number of its former members. But the principles and freedom of the
Theosophical Society remained inviolate.
18. Mrs. Tingley’s conflict with
these principles
The inherent vitality and strength of these principles were demonstrated
in the case of still a third woman of remarkable gifts and powers, who led what
was generally considered a rather theatrical crusade around the world, using
the name of the Society and for the promulgation of her understanding of
Theosophy. In so doing she was entirely within her rights, as were those who
followed and supported her. Whether her methods were good, bad, or indifferent,
necessary or unnecessary, is, from the theosophical standpoint, wholly immaterial.
It was the expression of her genius, and as such was good.
But when upon her return, flushed with her remarkable success, and
uplifted by the adulation of her personal following, she sought to dominate a
convention of the Society and enforce a pledge from its free membership to
adopt her as its leader and to follow where she led, she was then in conflict
with the fundamental principles of the Theosophical Society, and she and her
following passed from out its ranks.
Many more instances might be given illustrative of the inviolability of
the Society's guarantees of freedom and impartiality. From the Theosophical
Society, as from a great ante-room, many doors are open. And those who have
passed out, alone or taking others with them, whether to what they regard as
some higher, better chamber, or, in disappointment, back whence they came, have
still rendered to the Society deep and lasting service.
Gratitude is due them not only for their contributions as members — for
the play and fruits of their genius and the sincerity of their views — but also
for their leaving; for raising issues which revealed with added clearness the principles
upon which the Society rests, and for the demonstration these issues offered of
the enduring stability of its foundation.
In the Theosophical Society, where learning is through freedom of
opinion, and sympathy and synthesis of views, and the object of learning is the
Self, failure and success, folly and wisdom, weakness and strength alike have
had their lesson. However many departed, to however many off shoots it gave
birth, the free Society remained, fulfilling its original purposes, carrying
out its fundamental principles, true to its appointed destiny. And from all it
gained.
19. The history of the Theosophical Society
as written
in the thought of the world
in the thought of the world
From even such a cursory review as this, we must return convinced that
the true history of the Theosophical Society is neither in the history of its
organization, nor of the personalities that have risen to prominence within it,
but is rather in the growth and development of the principles which it
embodies. We have seen that these constitute an intellectual attitude and a
practical method, which the Society has made its own, but whose record must be
sought in the thought of the world. Have they there grown and born fruit?
To answer this question it is only necessary to contrast the conditions
of today with those of 1875. The sectarianism which then characterized all our
thinking has given place to a more liberal spirit. On all sides old barriers
have fallen, and what were formerly regarded as separate fields of knowledge
have been recognized as one. Nowhere has this been more marked than in the
great scientific discoveries of the last thirty years. Today each science leans
on all the others.
Chemistry and physics have interblended and illumined one the other ;
and by their twin processes we have penetrated deep into the mystery of the
atom, as a man may descend a stair, placing his weight first on one foot and
then upon the other. Or again they have lent their joint aid to astronomy, till
through the photographic plate and spectroscopic analysis we have learned of
invisible stars and recognized the elements flaming in the aura of the sun. Or still again they have been made
instruments for the study of biology, and in turn have been themselves
profoundly affected by the observations of stellar phenomena and by the
doctrine of evolution arising from biological research.
It is, indeed, precisely where the barriers have fallen, and two streams
of thought have poured their waters into one, that the greatest progress has
been made. Problems which had proved stubborn and insoluble to direct attack, easily
yielded their secret when the angle of approach was shifted and the light of
other knowledge brought to bear upon them. The advance of science has been a
testimony to the power and fruitfulness of the theosophic attitude and method.
It is noteworthy also that this advance has been in the direction indicated
by the third object of the Society. Thirty-four years ago our knowledge of the
ether was in its infancy; today it is scarcely an exaggeration to say that we
know more of it than of any other form of matter. In this invisible, intangible
medium we have found the source and seat of all electrical and chemical energy,
and the tremendous potency of its forces, locked within a single atom, runs into
figures we can express but hardly comprehend. We have come to realize that the
visible and tangible is rather an effect than a cause, a shifting shadow and
appearance of what is permanent, rather than its substance. And with this
growing knowledge of Nature's finer forces, the old materialism of science is
losing both its meaning and its hold.
The change of attitude in orthodox religion has been scarcely less
revolutionary. The old dogmatic tone seems strange and alien to our modern
thought. Sectarian strife and bitterness have given way to a more liberal
spirit and the recognition of a common aim.
Wider acquaintance with the Eastern scriptures has brought a clearer perception
of the unity of theme and of testimony in all great religious systems; and from
this has come a deepening sense of the reality of spiritual law.
Science is no longer regarded as the enemy of religion, but rather as
one who, if he would, could be her chief interpreter. Unseeing materialism and
unreasoning superstition, arrayed though they be one against the other, go hand
in hand, and must together pass away. In the development of religious thought, no
less than in science, the theosophic attitude and method have been operative
and have proved their worth.
No greater triumph can come to any man of generous spirit than to see
the ideals, for which he has long striven, triumphing in the world around him.
Such a man will have no thought of self, for his personality has been sunk in
the cause he serves. He will care little whether his own part was great or
small, so long as he knows he did his best. The degree of personal credit which
should accrue to him is a question he leaves to other minds. But it is a
question which other minds are sure to ask, and which arises with regard to the
Theosophical Society. Granted that the world has moved, granted, too, that its
movement has been in the direction of the Society's ideals, and that the use of
the theosophic attitude and method has played an important part in its
progress, the question still remains: how much of this is due to the Society
itself?
The answer falls under three main heads:
1) First, the Society must be credited with being the self-conscious exponent
of the principles which are triumphing, with being the conscious leader of what
has been otherwise a largely unconscious movement. We have seen that a third of
a century ago the Society advocated and adopted an attitude and method totally
at variance with the general thought of the time. Through all the vicissitudes of
its history it has maintained these inviolate, and has continuously labored to
advance certain ideals of freedom, tolerance, synthesis, and unity.
The world has followed; so that, in this direction, the Theosophical
Society has led its evolution. It has not been the leadership of authority, for
"the Theosophical Society has no personal authority to enforce or
impose." But it has been that true leadership which wider vision, and
stronger, conscious purpose can never fail to wield, even though those whom it
guides do not recognize its presence.
2) Second, by inspiring its own members and giving freedom and opportunity
to their genius, the Society has contributed, through them, directly to the
change in the thought of world. To be treated adequately this heading would
need both subdivision and amplification, for it covers a far wider field than
is generally supposed.
The extent and variety of the Society's literary output have been
already mentioned, and it was stated that in these books and articles many
recent scientific theories and discoveries had been anticipated. It is quite
true that for the most part they had been reached by other methods than those of
modern science, and there is a wide gap between the enunciation of a scientific
hypothesis and its experimental verification.
But to formulate a theory which is capable of the substantiation it
later receives, is to render a service which can only be fully appreciated by
the scientist who has confronted masses of phenomena to whose significance he
has no clue. His difficulty is more often the stating of his problem than its
solution, and once a clear statement is given him the thread is in his hands.
It is this quality of suggestiveness which characterizes Madame Blavatsky's
books to a most unusual degree, and which constitutes a large part of the value
of other papers in the Society's transactions. It is difficult to estimate the
extent of its influence, as it would be difficult to determine what portion of
the credit for our present submarine torpedo boats is properly ascribable to Jules
Verne's conception in Twenty Thousand
Leagues under the Sea.
He created a demand, quickening the imaginations of many men, skilled as
perhaps he was not, until this demand was met, and through their persistent, collective
labor his Nautilus became a fact. But
the Society's contributions to science have not been limited to mere
suggestiveness and the creating of a demand, for it has numbered among its
members those who have played no small part in scientific progress.
To mention the names of Alfred Russel Wallace, Camille Flammarion,
Thomas Edison, or Sir William Crookes, is to prove this point without further
comment. Yet, in view of Sir William
Crookes' acknowledgment of his indebtedness to Madame Blavatsky, it is
interesting to note that from his experiments in “radiant matter” have come all
the later discoveries of the X-rays, the Alpha and Beta rays, and the phenomena
of radio-activity which have revolutionized our view of all material substance
The Society's direct contribution to the development and change in
religious thought are even more easily traceable, as should have been made
apparent by what has already been said of its activity in the study of
comparative religion and in the popularization and interpretation of Eastern
scriptures. Here also it both created a demand and did much to aid in its fulfillment.
Greatest of all its contributions, however, was the demonstration it offered
that sectarianism was not the basis of religion, but that our perception of
spiritual law, as of natural law, was clarified by liberality and breadth of
view.
The spirit of such books as James' Varieties
of Religious Experience, or Fielding Hall's Inward Light and The Soul of a People, or those two remarkable
volumes by an unknown author, The Creed of
Christ and The Creed of Buddha,
is the logical outcome of the pioneer work of the Society's members, and, but
for it, would scarcely be possible today.
In like manner the seed of the whole modernist movement in theology may
be found in the view of the nature of truth which underlies the theosophic
attitude and method.
3) As the third factor in its contribution must be reckoned the indirect
effect the Society has had upon other organizations, in that many of its
members have felt it their duty to take an active part in the civic, religious
and scientific movements around them and to infuse these with the spirit of the
thesophic attitude and method. The
absolutely unsectarian character of the Theosophical Society is nowhere
demonstrated more clearly than in its influence upon its own members.
There has been no proselytizing, and very little weaning away from old
forms of faith. More often has each member gained from its discussions a clearer
perception of the truth his own creed reflects. The Christian has been made a
better Christian, the Buddhist a better Buddhist by the recognition of their
common tenets. It is strange that this could ever have been doubted, for when was
a man's faith shaken by the discovery that another shared his belief in its
truth?
To this freedom from the proselytizing spirit the Society owes a large
part of its influence. Its members have remained scattered in all forms of
denominational organization and have entered freely into the activities of the
time, spreading the theosophic spirit and working "as the little leaven
that leaveneth the whole lump." The
Society has not aimed to become a large and powerful organization. To have done so would have been to defeat its
own purpose. It seeks to be the nucleus of a universal brotherhood, by
radiating and infusing the spirit of brotherhood throughout the entire world.
20. The theosophic spirit
As the essence of the Theosophical Society is intellectually an attitude
and practically a method, so, ethically, it is a spirit, which is quickened by
assuming the attitude and practicing the method, but which then becomes their
basis. Just as, when children, we were told
that if we would look pleasant and act kindly we would find the feelings of
pleasure and kindliness springing up within us till their spirit became our
own, so this theosophic spirit is first born of its expressions and then
becomes their origin.
It is the wholeness of spirit which comes with the perception of the
unity of life. In our relations with other men it shows as brotherliness, as
sympathy and respect for their individuality. For the spirit of Christ's commandment
to love our neighbor as ourselves, and of Buddha's teaching of compassion, is
not other than the theosophic spirit taken into the realm of ethical conduct.
To understand this spirit it is only necessary to understand the philosophy
of unity and spiritual freedom which we have seen indicated in the stated
objects of the Society. If we become indeed convinced of "the fundamental
identity of all souls with the Universal Oversoul," that the universe is
one, and that life is whole, our view both of ourselves and of others undergoes
a profound change.
With Emerson we perceive that "we are open on one side to all the
attributes of God. There is no bar or wall in the soul where man, the effect,
ceases and God, the Cause, begins. The walls are taken away." These walls are the barriers of personality;
and when they have fallen we no longer see ourselves isolated and separate from
the whole of which we are a part.
We no longer seek to found our lives upon personal ambition or personal
self-indulgence, for we have had a vision of a self transcending personality.
We begin to live from within, rather than by external stimulus and reaction from
an outer environment. We begin to find in "the attributes of God" a
limitless source of power which can act through us, giving to the performance
of the smallest duty a certain universal coloring and significance.
I remember once listening to an army officer tell of his experience when
in absolute control of an isolated district in the tropics. His word was law,
from which there was no appeal. Surely, he said, if man can be free to follow his
own will, he was free then. Yet never
was his personal will more negligible, never had he been compelled to set his
personality so wholly aside. Case after case would be brought to him, by
enemies and friends alike, for judgment; but into his decisions he found no
personal prejudice or opinion could enter.
It was the universal quality of justice which must judge through him. He
was bound hand and foot by his traditions and ideals. And this, he told me, had
been to him a revelation of himself. Most
men he fancied, viewed themselves as he had done, as a congeries of personal
likes and dislikes, of ambitions and hopes and fears, together with a certain
personal will to be true to the good as it appeared to them. But in the light
of such experience he saw this "good" no longer as something imposed
upon man, but as his truer, deeper self, and this congeries of personal
qualities as but a mask through which this Self must speak.
When the personality is thus seen in its literal significance, as that
through which a greater voice must sound, we come close to a realization of the
ethical spirit of theosophy. Those whom it animates gradually become, in their
own being, part of the great moral order, their wills attuned to the Divine
Will, their righteousness the Breath of the Eternal Spirit, their lives the
Word made flesh. To such the obligation
of ethics is the demand of self consistency, and its basis is the nature of the
Soul.
21. The theosophic life
Thus that which is intellectually an attitude, practically a method, and
ethically a spirit, develops into what is, religiously, a life. It is a life of
service, at once of meditation and of ceaseless activity. For within and above man is infinite power
and around him is infinite need. His outer life stands as the finite link
between the two, but in the inner life he recognizes his oneness with them
both. Of him self he can neither give nor claim, but through him the infinite
may answer to the infinite.
It is a life of growth,—of growth toward the deeper Self and central
Oversoul. As the mind is turned toward the Truth behind all truths, as the principle
of spiritual unity is made active in our dealings with others, as the individual
will is attuned to the Divine Will, the old limitations of consciousness are
little by little transcended, and the nature transformed. We see new richness
and meaning in life, and that which before seemed cold and distant is suddenly
perceived glowing within our own hearts and vibrant with spiritual light. The
kingdom of the heavens is seen as indeed "at hand," to be entered
here and now by those who have at once the courage and the strength.
Above all it is a life of communion — a deepening sense of companionship
with the great of soul. It is not alone that high communion which Dante depicts
in the Elysian fields, where the sublime sages of the pagan past, grave and reverend
and noble men, walk and converse together, but where over all is a grey mist,
and their figures are dim and vague. Rather
is it touched with the rapture of his paradise, and lit by the light, however
distant, of the flaming heart of the rose; for it is the communion of love.
Such a communion did Christ promise to those who loved Him.
"He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that
Ioveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love
him, and will manifest myself to him. If a man love me he will keep my words:
and my Father will love him and we will come unto him and make our abode with
him."
The test of any scheme or philosophy of life lies in living it, and its
significance is the life to which it leads. So in the theosophic life is the
deepest significance and test of the principles upon which the Theosophical
Society is founded. Because of this, and
because the inspiration and vitality of the theosophical movement flow in large
part from its ethical spirit and religious life, we have touched upon them
here. But they concern the esoteric rather than the exoteric aspect of the
movement, and are not properly dealt with as part of its organism. The great
exoteric Society is wholly free.
Its members may accept or reject what they will of ethical spirit or
religious life. The Theosophical Society, as such, implies only an attitude and
a method; and to these it has been unfalteringly true.
(The Theosophical Quarterly, January 1910, vol. 7, p.218-240)
Hi! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new project in a
ReplyDeletecommunity in the same niche. Your blog provided us
beneficial information to work on. You have done
a outstanding job!
There is only one Way.
ReplyDeleteZelav