IS IT DANGEROUS THE HANDLING OF THE CHAKRAS AND KUNDALINI?

The answer is YES and NO, all depends on how intense you are going to do this.

And for you understand me better, imagine that you ask:

Is it dangerous to drive a motorcycle?

And a motorcyclist will answer you that depends what you are going to do with the motorcycle.

• If you only want to drive in an open area and at a low speed, then you can even afford not to use a helmet because in this situation the risk is very small.

• But if you are going to drive in a hectic city, then it is important that you use a helmet

• And if you want to participate in speed races, then in addition to protection, you must also need to have experience.

• But if you want is to perform acrobatic jumps on top of helicopters whose propellers are rapidly turning, then there is not enough to protect yourself and to have experience, you also need to do a whole lot of preparation work, because at that level the slightest mistake can be fatal.

And something similar happens with the handling of the chakras and kundalini.

And that is why I've been using the chakras and kundalini for over twenty years and nothing bad has happened to me, but it is because the exercises I use are very basic and therefore do not require no prior preparation.

To give you an analogy, it is as if I were using the basic techniques of phisical training, while another very different thing would be that I wanted to do somersaults like the Olympic gymnasts do.

And the same thing happens with the handling of the chakras and kundalini; more you use advanced techniques and more the handling becomes dangerous.

And this is why Master Pasteur warned about the use of kundalini intensively:

« Observe what happens when an individual only works to awaken his kundalini and play with his kundalini. Well, if that individual does not develop at the same time, wisdom and consciousness, then that individual destroys himself, crack his astral body, breaks his energetic body and he becomes sick and he can go crazy, and in any case he runs towards death. »

(Conference 06.12.86)

And Blavatsky also gave the same warning:

« Magic is connected with kundalini, which can as easily create as destroy, and that is why the ignorant novice can kill himself by not knowing how to use that power correctly. »

(SD III, p.537)

« The kundalini is the serpentine force, it is a mystical power (a siddhi) but if it is misused, it can kill you. »

(CW XI, p.488)

And Master Pasteur also noticed something similar about the handling of the chakras:

« I warn you that I am not going to teach you how to open your chakras, because there are already enough people who kill them, since you have to know that an exaggerated dilation of a chakra ends up causing death. »

(Conference 03.11.89)

And Blavatsky noticed the same warning:

« The practice of these techniques when they are ignorantly performed, invariably leads to an undesirable situation, because the yogi learns practically nothing, or he becomes a sorcerer, or more frequently he injures himself, and in the worst case he kills himself for such an imprudent practice. The mantra ignorantly employed may, and often has, proved a treacherous weapon, whose mystical power has caused it to turn and stab the user. »

(CW IV, p.164-166)

And obviously they are warning of advanced handling, not of basic handling.

~ * ~

Now, the question that surely many of you have is:

How to know when a technique can be dangerous and when not?

And my answer is that I do not know.

So I recommend you be cautious.

And also be aware that a basic exercise which normally it is not dangerous, if you done in an exaggerated way then it can also become dangerous.

RUDOLF STEINER's REINCARNATIONS

Rudolf Steiner mentioned six previous reincarnations that he supposedly had, and which I will enumerate in chronological order:

1) Enkidu, who is a character from Sumerian mythology and who was the adventurer companion of the mythological king Gilgamesh (about 3000 BC).

2) Cratylus, who was a Greek philosopher, born in Athens at the end of the fifth century BC and who was a priest of the Ephesus Temple.

3) Aristotle (384-322 BC) who was one of the most famous Greek philosophers and was also a forerunner of modern science, since apart from philosophy, he was also a mathematician, astronomer and he is historically recognized as the founding father of logical reasoning and biology.

4) Schionatulander who is a character from a heroic novel written by the German poet Wolfram von Eschenbach shortly after 1217, and who elaborated it based on the unfinished romantic poem entitled "Perceval, the Grail story" written by the French poet Chrétien de Troyes.

And although all indicates that this is an imaginary saga, Rudolf Steiner insisted that no, that this story was very real and that it took place between the 9th and 10th centuries in the Middle Age.

5) St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1270) who was one of the most important theologians of the Catholic Church, to the point that he was proclaimed Doctor of the Church on April 11, 1567, by Pope Pius V.

6) Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925).

7) And Steiner also announced that he would return to Earth at the end of the 20th century or the beginning of the 21st century.

And after reading that, I sigh of desolation!

And surely you will ask:

What is the problem with this list?

And the problem is that this list shows that Rudolf Steiner was very ignorant about how reincarnation works.

1.  To begin the Masters of wisdom and their true disciples assured that the time to re-reincarnate is much longer than what people imagine.

Alfred Sinnett, in his book "Esoteric Buddhism," he pointed out that the Masters explained to him that humans spend 1500 years in Devachan ("the paradise") before returning to Earth.

Then William Judge, who was a disciple of Master Morya, pointed out in the magazine "The Theosophical Forum" that those 1500 years is not a fixed duration for all people, but the average in general (as well as the current average life expectancy is around 77 years, although there are some who die a few months later and others who die after more than a century later).

And when people asked to Blavatsky, she answered in her book "The Key of Theosophy":

« This, we are taught, depends on the degree of spirituality and the merit or demerit of the last incarnation. The average time is from ten to fifteen centuries. »

(Section IX, p.145)

And Master Kuthumi in a letter wrote:

« Let us take but one million of years (suspected and now accepted by your science) to represent man's entire term upon our earth in this Round; and allowing an average of a century for each life and a average of 777 reincarnations, we find that whereas he has passed in all his lives upon our planet 77,700 years, while he has been in the subjective spheres 922,300 years. Not much encouragement for the extreme modern reincarnationists who remember their several previous existences! »

(Mahatma Letter 14, p.83)

So, as you can see, the dates given by Rudolf Steiner do not function because:

• From Enkidu to Cratylus it took 2600 years to reincarnate.

• From Cratylus to Aristotle, it took 50 years.

• From Aristotle to Schionatulander it took 1270 years.

• From Schionatulander to Thomas Aquinas it took 275 years.

• From Aquinas to Rudolf Steiner it took 590 years.

• And it would only take 75 years to reincarnate at the end of the 20th century or the beginning of the 21st century.

(I rounded the numbers)

So, if we exclude the first case of Enkidu, which is probably a pure fantasy from Steiner and his disciples, he was reincarnated on average every 450 years, which places him in the group of fanciful men who pretend to remember his many past lives, but that probably those are only inventions produced by their imagination.

2.  And the duration in Devachan mentioned by Rudolf Steiner is also incorrect because as Blavatsky pointed out: more a person is evolved and more his stay in Devachan is long. So it is absurd that a wild man like Enkidu stayed 2600 years in Devachan before returning to earth, while a great sage like Cratylus only stayed 50 years !!!

3.  But also the list that Rudolf Steiner mentioned does not make any sense because there is NO continuity through reincarnations.

You should know that the characteristics that you develop into a life, you inherit them in the next life.

And for you to understand me better, imagine a great sportsman like Cristiano Ronaldo, and imagine that someone tells you that at 30 years old, Ronaldo became a great violin virtuoso.

And you are going to emphasize that this statement does not make any sense because to become a great violin virtuoso, you have not only to have talent, but also to practice many hours for many years, and Ronaldo he does not could do it because he spent all his life to playing soccer.

So this statement is not only incongruous, but also false.

And the same thing happens with the statements made by Rudolf Steiner because, for example:

When did the primitive man Enkidu obtain wisdom and knowledge to become in his next reincarnation the great Greek philosopher Cratylus ???

Enkidu was a wild man who lived covered with animal skins and only loved to fight. So, it makes no sense to declare that in his next reincarnation, this barbarian become a great philosopher, because he has not developed his mind, his reasoning and his wisdom.

Declaring this is as absurd as declaring that Ronaldo became a genius of the violin.

And something similar can also be objected about the passage from Aristotle to Thomas Aquinas, because although Thomas Aquinas was a very bright man who even admired Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas was a very religious man who humanized and sanctified God, while for Aristotle, God was only an impersonal energy that produced the movement of univers, and therefore it is not any sense to pray to him.

If we see the characteristics that Aristotle showed in his life, most likely he will be reborn as a scientist and not as an ecclesiastic.

And it is also not logical that Thomas Aquinas reincarnated as Rudolf Steiner, because although the two men were very religious, Thomas Aquinas was a very honest man, while Rudolf Steiner was a very deceitful man.

CONCLUSION

This shows me several things:

·        Rudolf Steiner was a very liar man because there are a lot of falsities he has declared.

·        He was not in communication with the Masters as he claimed.

·        He did not have esoteric knowledge as he presumed.

·        And he was a pretentious guy because with the exception of Enkidu, all the other reincarnations he pretended to have had were from prominent men, which is unlikely.

And it is curious to note that the true instructors do not like to talk about past lives because neither Blavatsky, nor William Judge, nor Damodar spoke about it, but instead the liars are very enthusiastic to doing it as was the case of Charles Leadbeater, Elizabeth and Mark Prophet, Samael Aun Weor and also Rudolf Steiner.

THE ORIGIN OF THE MOON ACCORDING TO RUDOLF STEINER

Rudolf Steiner said that the moon was formed from the earth.

And surely you will tell me that this statement does not have anything particular, since science says the same thing. But the detail is that Rudolf Steiner gives a very different explanation science gives, since Steiner ensures that:

« After the earth was materialized, a very important cosmic event took place at that time: the sun was extracted from the earth and the solar forces simply left the earth.

So the sun was composed from a part of what had existed on earth in the life ether and in the chemical and light ether. And the other part was taken from the light ether of plants and humans. And these solar forces, so to speak, were withdrawn from the earth.

And the separation of the sun from the earth caused that the earth to cool and solidify more, and some time later a cosmic catastrophe happened, caused by the extraction of the moon also from the earth.

And this event caused a great revolution because with the separation of the moon from the earth, the moon also took away all its moon forces which also disappeared from the earth, and therefore during this period the humans could no longer impregnate themselves and produce other beings (like them) without outside help.

And that is why thereafter humans have to procreate by the interaction of the two sexes, and it is therefore understandable that the moon is considered as the symbol of the sexual reproduction force, because the moon initiated that form of reproduction. »

(This is found in his book "Cosmic Memory" in chapters 9 and 10)

So, Rudolf Steiner wants us to believe that when the earth was materialized, the sun came out of the earth and was formed from the ethereal substance of the planet and the beings that inhabit it.

And then the moon also came out of the earth and that is why humans already they cannot reproduce individually, but after the departure of the moon, now humans need to mate with the opposite sex to be able to procreate...

And now you will understand me when I say:

Oh my God!

Because I have rarely read anything so crazy and I cannot understand how there are individuals who consider Rudolf Steiner as a great clairvoyant.

His defenders have tried to compose the disparate that he said, arguing that it was not the current earth, but an earlier manifestation where the celestial bodies were still united.

But that is false, because specifically Rudolf Steiner said that his narration correspond to:

« The Akasha Chronicle back into that remote past in which our present Earth had its beginning. By “Earth” is to be understood that condition of our planet by virtue of which it can support minerals, plants, animals, and men in their form of today. »

So clearly Rudolf Steiner is stating that his story corresponds to Earth as we know it today.

And other defenders have argued that it is not the physical sun and the physical moon, but they are "energy forces" associated with those two celestial bodies. But that is also false because Rudolf Steiner clearly points out that after the sun separated from the earth:

• "The plants began to live under the influence of the light of that sun that had come out.

• "And in the human body, particular organs sensitive to the light began to develop, that is the first rudiments of human eyes."

So clearly Rudolf Steiner is talking about the physical sun and therefore also the physical moon.

And the question that arises is:

Why did Rudolf Steiner say something so absurd?

And the answer is because Rudolf Steiner based him on what is written in the Bible to elaborate his "creation story" because in the book of Genesis it is mentioned that:

« The first day God created the heavens and the earth.

   The second day God made the firmament, and divided the waters.

   The third day God appears the continents.

   And only the fourth day God created the sun and the moon. »

And since Rudolf Steiner took this narration literally, he considered that if at the beginning only the earth existed, then the sun and the moon must have extracted from the earth...

~ * ~

And this Steiner’s statement shows that his supposed clairvoyance that he presumed very much was only fantasies of his imagination.