Theosophy explains that at an
esoteric level, not all planets are equal, since there are planets that are
more important than others, and these planets that have a particular relevance in
the energetic structure of the solar system are called in the occultism:
“The Sacred Planets”
And as Alice Bailey pretended to
be a great esotericist, she gave the following classification of the planets of
our solar system:
Sacred planets
Vulcan
Mercury
Venus
Jupiter
Saturn
Neptune
Uranus
Non-sacred planets
Earth
Mars
Pluto
Moon
Sun
(This is found in her book “Esoteric Psychology”, volume I, part
two, chapter III, section 2 entitled: “The
Ray of Planet Earth”, p.335, the first edition was printed in 1936)
BUT THE DETAIL IS THAT THIS CLASSIFICATION IS ERRONEOUS!!!
Because the Masters and Blavatsky
in the book “The Secret Doctrine” they
pointed out that:
« The sacred planets are: Mercury, Mars, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, the Sun
and the Moon. »
(Volume I, p.575, 1888)
We see that the sacred planets
correspond to the planets used by ancient astrology. Which has much logic,
since astrology (and despite all the alterations that have been made) is a very
deep hermetic science and that is why the ancient astrologers knew the
importance of these planets.
And contrary to what modern
skeptics claim, the ancient sages knew that the sun and the moon were NOT
planets. However, they used them in their classification for hidden reasons, as
Blavatsky points out:
« This classification is accepted
only for astrological purposes. While the true classification (which is kept in
secret) differs from this, since the Sun, being the central star (and not a
planet) has an even deeper and more mysterious relationship with our Earth
chain than is generally known.
Neither the Earth, nor its
satellite, the Moon, nor even the stars, for another reason, were more than
substitutes used for esoteric purposes. »
(Secret Doctrine I, p.575)
The Sun and the Moon were used to represent two sacred planets that are
still unknown today.
Why did Alice Bailey give that wrong classification?
Because she based on Leadbeater's
erroneous teachings. And if you see the following table, you will realize that
they are the same planets that Alice Bailey designated as sacred planets, only
the planet Earth changed for Mercury.
TABLE
|
ALICE BAILEY
|
Vulcan
Venus
Earth
Jupiter
Saturn
Uranus
Neptune
|
Vulcan
Venus
Mercury
Jupiter
Saturn
Uranus
Neptune
|
This table was elaborated by the
researcher Arthur Powell and published in his book “The Solar System” in 1930 (six years before Alice Bailey published
her book “Esoteric Psychology”). And
this table was elaborated in based on what Leadbeater had written in his book “A Textbook of Theosophy” (1912).
But the detail is that this
structure is completely false and was invented by Leadbeater for the reasons
that I explain here. (Later I will put this
article)
CONCLUSION
If Alice Bailey had been the messenger of the Masters as she pretended
to be, then she would have mentioned the same sacred planets that appear in the Secret Doctrine, but we see
that in reality she read the Arthur Powell’s book to elaborate her supposed
esoteric classification, and to top it off, she did not even realize that what
Leadbeater taught was false !!!
You are mistaken. Bailey did not base her classification on Leadbeater. Even HPB wrote that the Sun is a veil for Vulcan and/or Uranus. Bailey rejected much that Leadbeater wrote. For example, in A Treatise on Cosmic Fire (1925) she rejects Leadbeater's claim that Mars and Mercury are part of the Earth chain. There is solid basis for Bailey's classification in HPB's writings. See https://m.facebook.com/groups/363230130479134?view=permalink&id=595953133873498&refid=18&__tn__=-R
ReplyDeleteI’m sorry, but who is very wrong is you and the reasons why you are mistaken, I detail them in this other article:
Deletehttps://esoteric-guide.blogspot.com/2019/04/sacred-planets-alice-bailey.html