Notice: I have written in other languages, many interesting articles that you
can read translated in English in this
link.

COUNTESS WACHTMEISTER ATTACKS WILLIAM JUDGE AND DEFENDS ANNIE BESANT



(Countess Wachtmeister wrote this text to defend Annie Besant against the accusation made against her by William Judge link; and I added subheadings for readability and my comments in purple.)



H.P.B. AND THE PRESENT CRISIS IN THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY


About William Judge

Having with the deepest sorrow and regret read the unjustifiable attack made by W. Q. Judge on Annie Besant, Ι think it my duty, as one of the oldest members of the T.S., and as one intimately acquainted with its leaders and inner history, to come forward and place before its members a few facts known to me which I have hitherto kept to myself.

The six years spent with Madame Blavatsky, during which I lived with her in the closest intimacy, have enabled me to be cognisant of much that is unknown to others. I deeply feel the necessity of giving to the members of the Society some of Η.P.Β.’s own words to me, which may elucidate a few of the perplexities caused by recent events.

During H.P.B.’s residence in Wurzburg and Ostend she was in continual correspondence with several Europeans and Americans, who were under her tuition at that time. Ι knew that Mr. Judge was one of her pupils. I had met him for the first time at Eugbien, as mentioned in my ”Reminiscences of H.P.B.,” and feeling a personal friendship for him, I asked Η Ρ.B. whether he would be the one to replace her when she left us.

Her reply was no, he would never be her successor: she had a high opinion of his knowledge as a lawyer, also of his remarkable executive faculties and his power of organisation (all of which she sensed beforehand, because they had not yet come into play), yet, from an occult point of view he would never progress much in this life, having failed in one of the trials placed in his path on the occult road. Then she added: “Poor Judge, he is his own worst enemy.”

Another day she called me into a room and showed me a letter, written by W. Q. Judge to her. It began with his own handwriting, which suddenly changed into the handwriting of H.P.B., and so perfect was the imitation that I could not detect a single flaw; then he went on with his own handwriting again to the end of the letter.

I looked at H.P.B. aghast, and said, “But surely this is a very dangerous power to possess, “to which she replied, “Yes, but Ι do not believe Judge would use it for wrong or evil purposes.” This I have repeated to W. Q. Judge, and he has denied it.

Colonel Η. S. Olcott has said to me that he possesses a letter written by W. Q. Judge containing imitations of several signatures.

(I am suspicious of these accusations made against William Judge because he was a man of great integrity who truly sacrificed himself for the Theosophical cause.)





About Annie Besant

Η.Ρ.Β. always told me that her successor would be a woman, long before Annie Besant had become a member of the Theosophical Society. She made various attempts with different people, hoping to find one, but was quite unsuccessful, so that she became terribly depressed and downhearted, saying, “There is nobody left to take my place when I am gone.

It was only when Annie Besant joined the movement that her hopes revived, for she seemed to feel that in her she would find a successor.

Η.P.B. told me this, but I had been so discouraged by the previous failures that I was determined to be on my guard and not accept Annie Besant unless entirely convinced if her disinterestedness of purpose and of her integrity.

I thought it just possible that she might be an ambitious woman entering the Theosophical Society with the thought of governing and getting all into her own hands, so I watched her narrowly, criticising her every action from tlιat point of view.

But as I noticed her life of daily self-sacrifice and continued endeavour to overcome her failings and shortcomings, how she took herself with an iron hand to task, and how with indomitable will-power she overcame one obstacle after another, I was obliged to confess to myself that my surmises had been both unjust and wrong.


One day I saw Annie Besant enveloped in a cloud of light—Master’s colour. He was standing by her side with his hand over her head. Ι left the room, went quickly to H.P.B., and finding her alone, told her what I had witnessed, and asked her if that was a sign that Master had chosen Annie Besant as her successor.

H.P.B. replied, “Yes,” and that she was glad I had seen it.


Again, one evening I accompanied Annie Besant to a small hall in London, where she lectured to workmen, when suddenly the Master was by her side, and she spoke with an eloquence which I had never heard from her lips before; it came flowing from her like a torrent of spiritual force.

I may add that I have since then here in India had repeated proof of her being in direct communication with Master.


During the last year of H.P.B.’s life, when living in Avenue-road, Annie Besant used to spend some time every evening with H,P.B. to receive occult teachings. One day she was told by H.P.B. to go to America, and on the evening of her departure H.Ρ.Β. called me to her room. After a few words of salutary advice to myself, she informed me that Annie Besant had gone to America to bear a message from H.P.B. to the American Section, and also to become better acquainted with W. Q. Judge, as on account of his power of organisation, he would be most useful in the exoteric work of the Society, and therefore it would be well for them to work together.

H.P.B. then, turning to me, said: “Master really communicates directly with Annie Besant, her development in this life is a very rapid one, it is the sudden bursting through the shell of all the development and knowledge gained in her previous lives of occultism.” H.P.B. continued: “Annie is soon coming very near to Master, and you may rely on her.” H.P.B. then went on to speak of her other pupils, but there my lips are sealed.


In confirmation of what Ι have here stated, Ι will quote from a letter, written by H.P.B. to W. Q. Judge, dated March 27th, 1891, of which Ι have a copy in my own possession. In this letter H.P.B. speaks of Annie Besant as “the soul of honour and uncompromisingly truthful,” and describes her heart as “one single unbroken diamond, . . . transparent so that anyone can see how filled to the brim it is with pure, unadulterated theosophy and enthusiasm.”

”UNSELFISHNESS AND ALTRUISM,” continues H.P.B., “is Annie Besant’s name, but with me and for me she is Heliodore, a name given to her by a Master, and that I use with her, it has a deep meaning. It is only a few months she studies occultism with me in the innermost group of the E.S., and yet she has passed far beyond all others. She is not psychic nor spiritual in the least—all intellect, * and yet she hears Master’s voice when alone, sees His Light, and recognises His voice from that of D____. Judge, she is a most wonderful woman, my right hand, my successor, when I will be forced to leave you, my sole hope in England, as you are my sole hope in America.”

The italics in the above quotation are all H.P.B.’s own and not mine. In this letter H.P.B. also thought it necessary to warn Mr. Judge when in Annie Besant’s presence against light and irreverent talk about occultism and the Masters, and generally against “the slightest exaggeration or deviation from fact,” to quote her own words.

(* H.P.B. told me that it was through the intellectual plane that Annie Besant would pass on to the spiritual plane.)

(Unfortunately, historical data shows that Annie Besant did not understand the occult lessons that Blavatsky gave her, since Besant showed herself to be quite ignorant of Theosophy; and neither did Besant truly communicate with the Masters, since she caused a lot of damage to the Theosophical Society.) 





Countess Wachtmeister's criticism of William Judge

It is strange that W. Q. Judge, having this letter in his possession, should attempt in his pamphlet to belittle the merits of Annie Besant by hinting that she has had but five years of training, when H.P.B. distinctly tells him how rapidly she has progressed, also that he lays such great stress upon her not being a teacher, whereas H.P.B. calls her her successor.

(Successor does not mean that Annie Besant was a teacher, and in this letter Blavatsky specified that Annie Besant was her successor in Europe, while William Judge was her successor in America.)

Mr. Judge at one time acknowledged this letter, having read out a portion of it to a small gathering of our members, in Avenue-road, shortly after H P.B.’s decease. Ι also know that some of the American members of the Theosophical Society are aware of the existence of this letter.

W. Q. Judge, in his pamphlet, refers to the very important part he hαs played in America in connection with the Theosophical movement, especially in the formation of the Esoteric Section (E.S.), or, as it has later been called, the Eastern School of Theosophy (E.S.T.).

Ι have in my possession the copy of a letter from Η.Ρ.Β. to an American lady, asking her if she would take the Headship of the Theosophical movement in America, because H.P.B. then feared the Society would collapse in America, as there was nobody to work for it. The lady refused the offer made to her.

Ι mention in my “Reminiscences” that H.P.B. had already spoken to me about the Esoteric Section when I was with her in Ostend; subsequently in England she asked me to draw out some rules, but finding the task a very difficult one, I advised her to apply to W. Q. Judge, as he in his capacity of lawyer would have a wide experience to help him.

She did so, and after having received the draft of the proposed rules from W. Q. Judge, H.P.B. discussed them freely with almost everybody who came to visit her; even a young member, who had just joined the Society, was asked to read them over carefully and give his opinion concerning them. He complied with her wish and made a suggestion as to the alteration of one of the rules, which H.P.Β. acted on.

Then as regards W. Q. Judge’s statement of having been a member of the Inner Group of the Ε.S. since 1891, it may be of interest to the members of the Theosophical Society to learn the circumstances under which he forced his way into that group, namely by producing one of those messages which Annie Besant has since repudiated as not being genuine, and it was on the authority of the same message, that we members of the Inner Group permitted him to enter without taking the usual Pledge.

As far as I am personally concerned, this message hαs always puzzled me, having been told by Η.Ρ.Β. of W, Q. Judge’s previous failure in occultism; and with regard to W. Q. Judge as a teacher, Ι cannot help saying that ever since I have known him I have not received any teachings from him which Ι had not previously learnt from Η.Ρ.B., whereas through Annie Besant I have learnt much that was unknown to me before.

(Unfortunately, Countess Wachtmeister did not fully understand the occult teachings either, as far as Annie Besant could impress her. But I can assure you that the teaching given by Annie Besant is full of errors and falsehoods, while the teaching given by William Judge corresponds to what the Trans-Himalayan Masters taught.)

Ι have always with pleasure listened to W. Q, Judge’s lectures, for he has a great faculty of presenting abstruse truths in a clear language, and H.P.B. had a high appreciation of his ability, as many of her letters to him bear witness, but this does not alter the facts previously mentioned.

H.P.B. had undoubtedly a sincere affection for W. Q. Judge, though he did not always prove himself worthy of it. Ι know how bitterly she felt in Wurzburg that he did not take up her defence against the attacks of the Psychical Research Society (SPR).

When he read that book in which she was so cruelly accused and trampled upon, surely, had he possessed the devotion for her which he now blazons forth before the world, he would have flown to her side, and tried through his-great ability, his devotion, and his presence, to heal some of the wounds of that bleeding heart. I can never forget those days of agony for Η.Ρ.Β., and how she felt herself deserted by all those who had professed such devotion to her.

As she pathetically said one day: “If there was only one man who had the-courage to come forward and defend me, as he would defend his own mother if thus scurrilously attacked the whole current of the Theosophical Society would be changed.”

It was a critical moment for the Society, and Η.Ρ.B. was left alone in her agony and despair. True I was with her and did the little I could for her and Η.P.Β. never forgot it. I shall always remember with gratitude the trust and confidence shown to me in so many ways, and Ι will be witness to her words and wishes as long as life is in me.

H.P.B. used to wear a signet-ring, to which she attached great importance. She had often said to me that this ring was to be handed over to her successor, and that the properties attached to it were very magnetic. When, after H.P.B.’s decease in London, I was informed that the ring had been given to Annie Besant by her express directions, I knew that Annie ;Besant was her successor.

Soon after the cremation of H.P.B.’s body I was astounded to hear that phenomena were being produced by W. Q, Judge.

H.P.B. had distinctly told me that the day for phenomena was past. I shall never forget the bright, happy expression of her face, and how glad she was to be relieved from producing phenomena; she said it was like an intolerable weight lifted from off her shoulders. She then proceeded to say that Master had explained to her that the Theosophical Society had passed through the physical phase—that of its formation; and through the psychical phase—that of occult phenomena; and was now entering into the intellectual phase, before reaching the spiritual.

I asked her: “But will the Masters, then, never communicate to persons through precipitated writing?”

And. she replied, “In some very rare cases, yes: when an order has to be given and the person is so dense that no other means of communication can be used.”

Thus, imagine my utter astonishment when I heard of letters being freely received, coming like a kind of avalanche through W. Q. Judge.

It seemed to me as if a psychic whirlwind was passing through the Society, and I was powerless to do anything, and could only wait patiently and note every event as it happened, knowing that as in the past it would be in the future—that nothing wrong could ever occur in the Theosophical Society without its being brought to light; every bud must blossom out either for good or evil.

H.P.B. also seemed to have a presentiment that a crisis was coming upon the Society; she often told me that troublesome times were in store for us, and that there would probably be a general upheaval of the whole Theosophical Society not long after her death—and her prediction has now unfortunately come true.


On my way to India, in October, 1893, Annie Besant informed me on the steamer that a terrible trial was awaiting her, that Master had told her directly that the communications received by her from W. Q. Judge, and purporting to come direct from the Master, were not genuine, and that she was further told that the Theosophical Society had to be cleared of this deceit, and that she would probably have to take action in the matter.

Annie Besant felt the agony of this very much, and her whole heart went out in pity to W. Q. Judge, never upbraiding him for the deceit practised on herself, although she keenly realised the ignoble part she had been made to play, having been the channel through which others had been deluded.

(This aseveration was not told to her by Master Morya, but by the perfidious Brahmin Chakravarti, whom Besant had accepted as her new teacher.)

I asked her whether she would act at once; her reply was that her orders were to wait till she saw the evidence. We then arrived at Adyar for the Convention, and there found a few of the members in a great state of commotion. The charges were being discussed among them, and there was a general wish to make them public at once.

A committee was formed, at which I was present, and after some discussion Annie Besant said that she considered that it would not be fair to bring forward these accusations publicly against W. Q. Judge when he was not there to defend himself.

She then offered to take the matter into her own hands, Colonel Olcott urging her to do so, saying that as such serious charges were brought against the Vice-President of the Theosophical Society, it was absolutely necessary for the good repute of the Society that he should clear himself entirely of these charges.

All the members of the Theosophical Society know the result; how W. Q. Judge persuaded the Committee to dismiss the case without going into the evidence, and thus got out of the dilemma in which he had been placed, without ever clearing himself, for these charges still remain unanswered, casting a slur on the Theosophical Society, because the evasive replies he has sent to the Westminster Gazette and New York Sun can in no way be called satisfactory.

I met W. Q. Judge in New York on his return to America from the European Convention, and was shocked to see the change in his personal appearance; insomnia and suffering had left their mark on him, and he looked terribly dejected.. It seemed to me that the lesson had been such a severe one to him that spurious messages would be a thing of the past.

I told him that under these conditions I would willingly work with him in the future, and later on, when the Westminster Gazette articles first came out, I also wrote to him in this sense. I was under the impression that his object in preventing the charges being made public was that he thought it would bring about a collapse of the whole Theosophical Society.

I may probably be severely blamed for my attitude in thus submitting without protest to the hushing up of the affair, but I really believed in the sincerity of W. Q. Judge’s repentance, and, remembering all his past work and devotion to the cause, I was not going to turn my back on a brother.

Besides, I thought that the work of the Society could not be seriously affected by the failings of an individual member, and I hoped that the past experience would prove to members that without truth and honesty there is no chance of the Theosophical Society making its way in the world.

My hopes were rudely dispelled when W. Q. Judge issued his circular, accusing Annie Besant and Professor Chakravarti of the practice of black magic, and in consequence deposing the former from the headship of the Esoteric School of Theosophy.

This circular was issued to the members of the Esoteric School of Theosophy only, marked “strictly private,” and this was to my mind a not very honourable course of action, because had W. Q. Judge really believed Annie Besant guilty of such evil practices, it would have been his imperative duty as Vice-President of the Theosophical Society to warn the whole Theosophical Society and not only the members of the Esoteric School of Theosophy, and place them on their guard against two such dangerous members.

W. Q. Judge had absolutely no right in deposing Annie Besant from the headship of the Esoteric School of Theosophy, because at the Con­vention in London, July, 1894, Annie Besant, having felt that she could no longer work conscientiously with W. Q. Judge, the Esoteric School had been divided into two sections, W. Q, Judge remaining at the head of the American and Annie Besant at the head of the European and Indian Sections, with entire separation, no member being permitted to join the section outside his own country.

This was a very arbitrary arrangement, and many members expressed their dissatisfaction, some in America saying that they were no better than bales of goods to be cast whither the heads pleased to throw them.

Having once made this compact, both Annie Besant and W. Q. Judge were bound to keep it, unless through the agreement of both parties it was altered, and therefore it was distinctly a breach of faith for W. Q. Judge to send the above-mentioned circular to the members of Annie Besant’s school without her knowledge and consent, especially when she was thousands of miles away, and those members of her school who unhesitatingly accepted W. Q. Judge’s circular were not only endorsing his accusations against Annie Besant without waiting to hear what she had to say in her defence, but also acted dishonestly towards their own leader in obeying an order given by the head of another section, to which they did not belong.

I indignantly repudiated W. Q. Judge’s order as coming from Η.P.B.’s Master. The shocking charges against Annie Besant and Professor Chakravarti, for which. there is not the least shade of evidence, were very revolting to my mind, and I could hardly believe it possible that W. Q. Judge could use such an ignoble method of trying to extricate himself from his own painful position by attributing such crimes to others.

The honourable character of Professor Chakravarti is well known here in India, and defence of him is entirely superfluous. At the Indian Convention in December, 1894, a universal vote of confidence was given to him by unanimously electing him on the Council and Executive Committee of the Indian Section. W. Q. Judge’s ridiculous charges we treated with well-deserved contempt.

Still more surprising does W. Q. Judge’s reference to Mr. Chakravarti become to me when I remember that in February, 1894, at Allahabad, Annie Βesant and I both received letters from Mr. Judge advocating the nomination of Mr. Chakravarti as President of the Theosophical Society. Mr. Chakravarti himself has also received a letter from W. Q. Judge urging him to accept this important position, an offer which he immediately and entirely refused.

Thus W. Q. Judge offered the Presidentship of the Theosophical Society to a man whom he alleges to be an agent of black magicians, as in his pamphlet, page 6, he asserts that “Master’s Agents” were secretly watching Mr. Chakravarti in America in the Autumn of 1893, believing him to be under evil influences.

Any sensible person reading W. Q. Judge’s circular must be struck by some startling assertiοns. I have just mentioned the agents which the Master, according to W. Q. Judge, is in the habit of using to watch suspected individuals, and then repeating to W. Q. Judge the information thus honourably acquired. I consider it sacrilege to suppose that H.P.B.’s Master can make use of spies.


On page 8, W. Q. Judge states that the plan of the Black Magicians was “to have Colonel Olcott resign when he (Judge) had been cut off, the Presidency then to be offered to her” (Annie Besant), and that “she was made to believe that it was the Master’s wish for her not to oppose.”

As a matter of fact, during last winter Ι heard Colonel Olcott offer to resign the Presidentship in favour of Annie Besant, but she positively refused to accept it.


On page 11 is the following assertion; “I also state on the same authority that H.P.B. has not reincarnated.”

(Chakravarti had a little girl and he claimed that Blavatsky had been reincarnated in his little girl, which many believed, but Master Kuthumi in a letter written in 1900 assured that Blavatsky had important matters to attend to on the subtle planes and that therefore Blavatsky would take a long time to reincarnate again.)

During the summer of 1893 W. Q. Judge informed me that he had been told by Master that H.P.B. had been reincarnated. Mrs. Archibald Keightly also confirmed this statement, telling me that she had seen and conversed with H.Ρ.B. in her new body. This autumn Mrs. Keightly said to me that she had been mistaken in her vision. Ιt is curious, however, that W. Q Judge, the great occultist he pretends to be, can have been mistaken on so important a point.


On page 7 of his pamphlet Mr. Judge further asserts: “Now, then, either I am bringing you a true message or the whole Theosophical Society and E.S.T. is a lie.”

How is it possible to believe this in face of the above contradictions?



I need not enter into further discrepancies; the whole pamphlet goes to prove that W. Q. Judge has been mainly prompted by personal ambition and desire to get the whole of the Theosophical Society into his own hands; and in order to do this he must get rid of Annie Besant; and so in his pamphlet he not only makes her out to be an irresponsible being, a victim of “Black Magicians,” but also accuses her of actually practising the black art on himself and two other persons, one of whom suffered in health thereby.

Thus he tries to incapacitate her for any further work in the Society, for what honest man or woman would consent to associate or work together with one whom they believed could be capable of such iniquity. One has only to trace out the events in the life of Annie Besant to see that she has none of the vices or failings which might attract evil forces to her, so as to influence her to practise the black arts.

Further, nobody who reads Annie Besant’s reply to these charges, and contrasts her calm and dignified behaviour with W. Q. Judge’s desperate attempts at self-enthronement, can be left in doubt which of the two has kept true to the cause to which they both have pledged themselves.

(Later events show that Annie Besant was indeed submerged by evil influences as she ended up causing much harm to the Theosophical Movement.)

If we are blindly to accept W. Q. Judge’s circular, what would be the result? That we should be expected to obey any message given to us by the Head of the E.S.T., as W. Q. Judge claims to be, without using our moral judgment as to whether it is a true message or a false one.

It must never be forgotten that in all progress in the spiritual life the faculty of discrimination is of the most vital importance, and if this be atrophied by the habit of blind obedience the aspirant will soon find himself at the mercy of varied and opposing forces between which he will be unable to distinguish.

Therefore, our common sense must never be left out in the cold, because then the door is open to all kinds of slanders, and any member may follow W. Q. Judge’s example and accuse his neighbour of black magic.

This severs the tie of brotherhood completely, for in the heart of each will lurk the thought that his fellow-member may at any moment bring up such an accusation against him. Nor can we leave the interests of the members of the Theosophical Society who are not Esotericists, and the general public out of regard, nor forget the dangers which must accrue if under a pledge of secrecy, slanders are to be circulated against individuals, of which the people concerned may perhaps never become aware.

Another result of the policy of implicit obedience to, and blindly following, a leader is that the theosophical Society, of which the E.S T. is the palpitating heart, would no longer be a free Society, it would become a church, with its dogmas, articles of faith and its pope, all liberty of action would by degrees be quelled, we should have missed our vocation, and there would only be one sect more added to the numerous sects already in existence. It would be in direct opposition to H.P.B.’s teachings, and I therefore emphatically refuse to believe that H.P.B.’s Master has issued such an order as W. Q. Judge’s circular, or worse still, that he, like a detective, uses agents to spy upon the movements of others.

It has been a most painful task to write these pages, and if W. Q. Judge had been merely a private member of the Theosophical Society Ι should never have issued. it, because in a Brotherhood like the Theosophical Society we have no right to bring the failings of a private member before the world, but W. Q. Judge holds a high official position, namely, that of Vice-President, with the possibility of being elected some day President of the whole Society. It was therefore plainly my duty to place before the public these facts, for the acts of a high official affect the whole Society, and the slightest suspicion of fraud or unfair dealing has to be cleared up or else the Society suffers.



(This text was first published in London in May 1895 in a private pamphlet, and later in the magazine “Theosophy in Australasia”, July 5, 1895, p. 5-8)






OBSERVATIONS

The crisis that the Theosophical Society suffered in 1895 occurred because two of its leaders (Colonel Henry Olcott and Annie Besant, who led the Theosophical Society in Asia and Europe respectively), with the influence of Chakravarti, wanted to expel William Judge (who led the Theosophical Society in America) from the Theosophical Society.

And to achieve this, Olcott and Besant fabricated various accusations against Judge, mainly that he falsified documents and that he fabricated his communication with the Masters.

Countess Wachtmeister was under Annie Besant's direction and that is probably why she defended Besant, but historical data shows that the good guy in this conflict was William Judge.

The Countess later became disillusioned with Annie Besant when she saw the misdeeds she was making, and that is why the Countess resigned from the Theosophical Society around 1900.











 

BLAVATSKY'S LAST DAYS NARRATED BY COUNTESS WACHTMEISTER




Extracts from Countess Wachtmeister's Letters as to H.P.B.'s Last Days


October 24, 1890

Several new projects have sprung up lately. One is to take the house next door, which is to be let. Miss Cooper, Miss Chambers and Mr. Sturdy are those most likely to guarantee the rent.

The house has a nice garden and conservatory, and as we should have a door of communication open into our house, or rather grounds, it would form a larger centre of force and activity at Avenue Road.

On the first Monday of every month, Mrs. Cooper-Oakley and I are going to be at home in the evening. H.P.B. says that it is absolutely necessary to work in all grades of society, and Society people have entirely ignored us since we have lived in Avenue Road; so we are going to make a supreme effort to attract them to the house.

You may fancy how serious H.P.B. is when she orders evening dress.





March 6, 1891

Things are going pretty well here.  The Thursday evenings are continued, though H.P.B. is seldom present; in fact, we rarely see her now. She shuts herself up for days together.

She is having a room built out into the garden, leading from her own room; and then, I expect, she will shut herself away altogether. As she grows weaker, she finds it trying to have so many people buzzing around her.





April 19, 1891

H.P.B. is certainly growing more and more feeble, and she feels that to be able to do any work at all she must be quite alone, so as to enable her to concentrate her energies. Her present sitting-room is a passage room to the E. S., and she cannot have that quiet and solitude that are necessary; and so the inner room, now being built, will be closed to all outsiders, relations included.

Part of the money has been given to her, the remainder will be taken from the profit from her books.  She says that her body is now so broken and shattered that it is only by being much alone that she can keep it together; and I expect the day will come when she will shut herself up altogether, and only occasionally see those in the house.

As it is, we never go near her except in the evening.




(Blavatsky died on May 8, 1891)




May 25, 1891

We have indeed had a terrible time, and it seems hardly possibly even now to realise that H.P.B. is gone.  We all felt so sure that she would live to the end of the century; so that though all this winter we have seen her continually failing and decreasing in strength, we were not really alarmed.

H.P.B. did very little work this winter; and as I wrote you before, gradually separated herself from us. I believe now that she knew that the end was coming soon, and did this to accustom us to her absence, and also to watch us and see how we should get on alone without her; and now we have to work alone and do the best we can.
 

(The Theosophist, May 1929, p.124-125)










BLAVATSKY'S MOVE FROM OSTEND TO LONDON




In this article, Dr. Archibald Keightley recounts the move in May 1887 of Madame Blavatsky, who was living in the city of Ostend in Belgium, to London in England:



FROM OSTENDE TO LONDON

A Turning Point in the Theosophical Movement


In the early months of 1887 there were some few members of the T. S. in London who felt that if Theosophy did not receive some vital impulse, the centre there would be confined to a few individuals only who were pursuing and would continue to pursue their studies.

Of course there may have been many who felt the same, but I write here of those with whom I was actually in contact. There were many anxious discussions as to how a vital interest could be awakened in the truths of Theosophy, and how attention should be restored to the ethical philosophy.

This was the more necessary, for in the public mind the philosophy had been inseparably connected with the phenomena. We all felt that we were working in the dark and that we were ignorant of the real basis upon which the philosophy rested.

Obviously we required a leader who might intelligently direct our efforts. We then determined each separately to write to H.P. Blavatsky, who was then in Ostende, laying before the Founder of the Theosophical Society and the Messenger of the Masters the position as each of us saw it. We asked her to reply in a collective letter giving us advice as to what to do.

She replied, however, to each individual, writing letters of eight to twelve pages. The result of this was that we all wrote and asked her to come over and direct our efforts. She had told us that she was writing the Secret Doctrine and must finish that before undertaking other work. Nevertheless we wrote to her that there was, we believed, urgent need of her directing presence, and that she could finish the Secret Doctrine in London as well as or better than in Ostende.

After receiving her reply, which urged objections, Mr. Bertram Keightley went over to Ostende during the latter part of February or beginning of March and talked matters over with her.

She agreed to come to London at the end of April provided we would find a house for her somewhere a little out of London in which she could work in peace.

Soon after he returned I went over to Ostende rather unexpectedly myself. I naturally went to call after leaving my luggage at the hotel. Madame Blavatsky received me with the greatest kindness, although previously to that occasion I was almost unknown to her. She insisted that I should transfer my things to her house and stay with her while in Ostende. At that time she was occupying the first floor of the house, with a Swiss maid to wait on her and Countess Wachtmeister to keep her company.

I was at once introduced to the Secret Doctrine with a request to read, correct, and excise, a privilege I naturally did not avail myself of.

Madame Blavatsky at that time had never ventured out of her rooms since the previous November, and never came from her writing and bed-room into the dining-room until the windows had been closed and the room well warmed. Several attacks of inflammation of the kidneys had warned her that the slightest chill was dangerous to the completion of her work.

At the close of my visit I returned to England with renewed assurances of her arrival on May 1st, and under pledge to return and assist Madame Blavatsky on her journey to London.

I had not been in London many hours when one of our members, Dr. Ashton Ellis, received a telegram from Countess Wachtmeister saying, as I recall its tenor, that Madame Blavatsky had had another inflammatory attack on the kidneys, that she was comatose, and that her life was in the utmost danger.

Dr. Ellis went over to Ostende and attended her. He told me that he was extremely surprised, and so were the others who know her serious condition, to find her recovering in a few days. Her state then was so critical that she began arranging her affairs before the comatose attack came, burning up papers and having a will drawn up so as to be ready for the end.

Later on she told me herself that her life was saved by the direct intervention of her Master. Her endurance manifested itself even at this point, for as soon as she could leave her bed she was again at work on the Secret Doctrine.

In the middle of April Mr. Keightley again went over, and I followed him about the 25th or 26th. We were rather in consternation because Madame Blavatsky said she could not possibly leave in such weather as then prevailed, especially on account of her late serious illness.

Her landlord said she must leave, for the rooms were let. Countess Wachtmeister had previously left for Sweden to attend to urgent business affairs there under promise to rejoin Madame Blavatsky in London. Staying in the house with us was a friend of Dr. Ellis who assisted in the removal.

The fated day came, and in place of being bright but cold, as had been the case two days before, the morning proved to be cold and foggy, with a steady drizzling rain falling and penetrating all it touched, the thermometer being about 40 degrees.

We fully expected Madame Blavatsky would decline to move, and thought her justified in doing so. Nevertheless she appeared that morning in full marching order, the trunks were packed, and all was ready. The carriage arrived and Madame Blavatsky was assisted into it, and off it drove to the wharf.

It must be remembered that she had not had a window open in her room while she was in it (and would scarcely allow it open while she was out) for six months.

She kept her room at a temperature of over 70 deg., believing that anything under that would kill her. Moreover, she was almost crippled with rheumatism and could hardly walk, and was a constant martyr to sciatica.

On getting to the wharf we found the tide low, and in consequence that there was only a narrow gangway leading at a very steep incline to the steamer’s deck. Imagine our dismay. Madame Blavatsky, however, said nothing, but simply grasping the rails walked slowly and without assistance to the deck. We then took her to a cabin on deck where she sank on to the sofa and only then betrayed the pain and exhaustion caused by her effort.

The journey was uneventful so far as Dover, save that for the first time in her life Mme. Blavatsky knew what the preliminary qualms of sea-sickness meant and was much puzzled. At Dover the tide was still lower, and as a result four very stalwart piermen had to carry her to the top.

Then came the greatest difficult, for the platform is low and the English railway carriage steps were high. It required the united efforts of all the party (and the piermen as well) to assist Madame Blavatsky in her crippled state into the carriage.

The journey to London was uneventful, and with the help of an invalid chair and a carriage she was safely lodged in the house we had secured for her. Secretly I was afraid the journey would have serious results, but, whatever was the reason, she seemed to enjoy better health for some time after her arrival in England then she had for months previously.

The day after her arrival she was at work on the Secret Doctrine at 7 a.m., and did not appear best pleased because she had been prevented from an earlier start through her writing materials not having been unpacked the previous night.

A. KEIGHTLEY.



Editor's note

Dr. Keightley was asked to give the above short account of an important point in our history. It was a turning-point indeed, since it resulted in the re-awakening of the London centre. A postal card sent to the Editor by H. P. B. after she got to London may be of interest and is here given.

« Addressed "W. Q. Judge Esq., Editor The path, New York, U. S. A.", postmark May 7, 1887.

From H.P.B., Maycot, Crownhill, Upper Norwood, London, May 7th.

On thy prophetic soul! Didn’t know old H.P.B. was for seventeen days hovering between life and death; drawn irresistibly by the charm beyond the latter, and held by her coat-tails by the Countess and some London Lodges?

Nice intuitional friend. Anyhow saved once more, and once more stuck into the mud of life right with my classical nose.

Two Keightleys and Thornton (a dear, REAL new Theosophist) came to Ostende, packed me up, books, kidneys, and gouty legs, and carried me across the water partially in steamer, partially in invalid chair, and the rest in train to Norwood, in one of the cottages of which here I am; living (rather vegetating) in it till the Countess returns.

Write here "1000 words for the Path"?

I’ll try, old man. Very, very seedy and weak; but rather better after the mortal disease which cleansed me if it did not carry me off. Love and sincere, as usual and for ever.

Yours in heaven and hell.

‘O. L.’  H.P.B. »


(Published in The Path, New York, November 1892, pp. 245-248)






Bertram Keightley's Testimony

Regarding this transfer, Mr. Bertram Keightley recounted the following in an article:

« The first I saw of The Secret Doctrine manuscript was on a visit paid to H.P.B. at Ostend, at the very beginning of the year 1887. I have gone over to urge upon H.P.B. the advisability of coming to settle in London for the purpose of forming a centre for active work in the cause of Theosophy.

There were six of us in all who felt profoundly dissatisfied with the deadness which seemed to pervade the Theosophical Society in England, and we had come to the conclusion that only H.P.B. could give efficient aid in restoring the suspended animation of the movement, and initiating active and wisely directed work.

Of these six — with H.P.B. the original founders of the first Blavatsky Lodge — two only, alas! Now remain active workers in the Society.

During the few days I then spent at Ostend with H.P.B., she asked me to look over parts of the MSS. of her new work, which I gladly consented to do. Before I had read much it grew plain that The Secret Doctrine was destined to be by far the most important contribution of this century to the literature of Occultism; though even then the in choate and fragmentary character of much of the work led me to think that careful revision and much re-arrangement would be needed before the manuscript would be fit for publication.

On a second visit a week or two later, this impression was confirmed by further examination; but as H.P.B. then consented to come and settle 'in or near London as soon as arrangements could be made for her reception, nothing further was done about it at the time.

Not long after my return to England we learnt that H.P.B. was seriously ill, in fact that her life was despaired of by the physicians in attendance. But, as usual, she disappointed the medical prophets and recovered with such marvelous rapidity that soon after we were able to make arrangements for her coming to England, to Upper Norwood, where a cottage, called Maycot, had been taken for her temporary residence.


The move was effected without any untoward event, though the packing up of her books, papers, MSS., etc., was a truly terrible undertaking, for she went on writing till the very last moment;, and as sure as any book, paper, or portion of MSS. had been carefully packed away at the bottom of some box, so surely would she urgently need it, and insist upon its being disinterred at all costs.

However, we did get packed at last, reached Maycot, and before we had been two hours in the house, H.P.B. had her writing materials out and was hard at work again. Her power of work was amazing; from early morning till late in the evening she sat at her desk, and even when so ill that most people would have been lying helpless in bed, she toiled resolutely away at the task she had undertaken. »

(“Reminiscences of H.P. Blavatsky and “The Secret Doctrine” by Countess Wachtmeister and others, appendix I-1, p.89-95)










THE COUNTESS WACHTMEISTER DEFENDS BLAVATSKY



In this letter, Countess Wachtmeister defends Blavatsky from the slander that the spiritist Emmette Coleman said against Blavatsky.



To the Editor of the Religio-Philosophical Journal.

I have just read in the 10th March issue of your Journal the kind and noble defense of Madame Blavatsky by Mrs. Helen Densmore, and think it only right I should add my testimony to hers.

This being the third winter that I have lived with H. P. Blavatsky, I feel that there is no one who has a better opportunity of knowing her than I have, and thus a better right to refute the untrue accusation of her using intoxicating drinks!

Not having read Mr. Coleman’s slanderous article, I cannot touch upon any other untrue statements which he may have made. I can only say that I personally have the highest respect and esteem for Madame Blavatsky, and knowing how utterly false are all the stories invented and circulated by people who have no personal acquaintance with that lady, I attribute Mr. Emmette Coleman’s calumnies to personal spite, a very ignoble feeling indeed.

I emphatically deny the accusation that Madame Blavatsky makes use of intoxicating liquors; for she has never ceased to hate the very smell of wine from her earliest childhood, as I have heard from many. She will not even take wine by order of her physicians as medicine, who seeing that her constitution could not stand such a violent remedy, abandoned it.


If people, before accusing their neighbors, would take the trouble to find out whether their accusations are founded on the knowledge of some one or simply on hearsay, we should probably find more charity among men and less desire to slander those, about whom probably they know nothing certain.

It seems strange to me that amongst all our good and devoted brother theosophists in America, Mrs. Densmore should be the only one to take up the cudgels in defense of Mme. Blavatsky and refute this untrue statement. All the more credit and thanks to her for coming forward to defend the reputation of a sister theosophist.


We all owe so much to Mme. Blavatsky for having founded the Theosophical Society and for having been the instrument through which we have received so much knowledge and spiritual truth, that I think we theosophists ought to rise in a body to defend her against her enemies and their vile accusations.

I am devoting my life to the theosophical cause and to Mme. Blavatsky, because firstly, I believe with all my heart and soul in the esoteric truths taught by her; and secondly, because I find that a universal brotherhood on the basis given is the only salvation for a mankind which is fast rivaling the senseless beasts in selfishness and indifference, when not hatred to each other.

I have sacrificed much that the world holds dear to serve the theosophical cause, and would certainly not have done so had I not been convinced of the truth of all I here state and much more besides.

I am, sir, yours faithfully.
Countess Constance Wachtmeister.
Nottingham, England, April 9th.


(This letter was printed in The Religio-Philosophical Journal, Chicago, Illinois, May 5, 1888, p.6)





OBSERVATION

Other people who also knew Blavatsky well claimed that she did not drink alcoholic beverages, which demonstrates Mr. Coleman's lack of ethics, as he fabricated lies solely out of perfidy. Furthermore, the other accusations Mr. Coleman made against Blavatsky also turned out to be false.











REMINISCENCES OF BLAVATSKY BY CONSTANCE WACHTMEISTER



In this letter, Countess Wachtmeister talks about how the SPR tried to overthrow Blavatsky and the Theosophical Society but it failed.



A NEW YEAR’S GREETING

The new year, 1891, has now commenced, and as it is likely to prove an eventful one in the history of the Theosophical Society, I should like to begin by sending a few words of greeting and grateful thanks to all who have helped me by their sympathy to carry out my share of the work.

When I first went to Wursburg in 1885 to visit Madame Blavatsky, I little realized the vast importance and magnitude of the work in which we are now engaged; and though I firmly believed in the mission which H. P. B. was trying to accomplish, and had full faith in her honesty of purpose, it seemed to me an utter impossibility that Theosophy could ever reach the hearts of the people, and so become a living power in the world for good.

I looked around me and saw that what most interested the public was phenomena; the sublime and divine truths contained in Theosophy were ignored, or assimilated only by the very few; and when that cowardly and abominable attack was made on Madame Blavatsky by the Psychical Research Society, I feared that it would either kill the Theosophical Society or alienate those who were attracted only by curiosity and desire for the marvellous.

At first it seemed as if the Society had received its death blow; day after day came in resignations from those who had hitherto been looked upon as shining lights in the Society, or else insulting letters from men and women who until then had worn the mask of friendship.

The remainder of the members of the Theosophical Society were more or less paralyzed, and all they wanted to do was to keep quiet and out of sight, so that no mud should be thrown at them.

But a few bright stars shone through the darkness, jewels of friends who kept staunch and true through all, and it was really their expressions of sympathy and love which kept H. P. B. alive.

When I think of that long, dreary winter, when we two lived together in that quiet German town, where we had not a single friend; when I think of how my heart used to sink every morning, when the postman’s ring was heard, at the thought of fresh insults which the letters would surely contain, I consider it a sacred duty to tell all members of the Theosophical Society how deeply H. P. B. has suffered for the noble cause to which she has dedicated her life.

Day after day she sat at her desk from early morn till night, writing the Secret Doctrine, which was destined to teach and help so many seekers after truth, we little knowing the work and future which lay before us.

As I think of those days there always lies deep down in my heart one eternal regret, viz: that my intuition should have been so obtuse that I did not realize the enormous importance of this grand philosophy, and that I did not give every moment of my time to its study.

But it seemed so far beyond me in those days, as if the understanding of such sublime truths could never be reached by me in this lifetime, and so I let the valuable hours slip away.

And now when experience and study have given me the hope that I could comprehend what before appeared so difficult, my work lies in another direction, practical work for the spreading of Theosophy, which brings me little leisure for quiet reading and reflection.

Karma, I suppose!


The winter of 1886-87 I spent alone with H. P. B. in Ostend.  Notwithstanding my forebodings, the Society had not collapsed under the S. P. R. ’s treacherous blow, and a few straggling members came to life again and rallied round Madame Blavatsky.

Visitors appeared one after the other on the scene; confidence in H. P. B. began to revive; and serious thoughts for the future were entertained as to the further development of the Theosophical Society.  These culminated in the plan of her coming to London.

Arriving there in May, H. P. B. settled in Lansdowne Road, Notting Hill, in September, 1887, in company with a few devoted friends. Since that time the work and influence of the Society have steadily increased, notwithstanding the defalcation of a few members whose personal vanity was hurt because they did not receive the homage to which they felt they were entitled.

The Theosophical Society continued to widen out, friends rallied round in greater numbers, and after three years of steady work the Society was placed on a firm basis.

It became apparent that a larger house was necessary, and a move was made to our present Headquarters, during the summer of the past year; and now in 1891, after all these years of persecution and suffering, Madame Blavatsky is surrounded by a strong and faithful band of tried men and women, who are true to the death, and who will bear the brunt of any new attack or insult which the future may have in store for her.

Not only has she formed from among these an efficient staff of workers, but she has the happiness of knowing that she has about her those who love and revere her, who value her teachings, and who would willingly give their lives to save her a single pang.  There is now every hope that the remaining years of her life may be passed in that peace which is essential to the achievement of her great work; no attack from without will be allowed to fall upon her, and no besmearing of her reputation will have the slightest effect upon those who have known and put her to the test, and who now appreciate her as she deserves.

On the contrary, any such attack will be sure to rebound on those who may attempt to blacken her name, to disturb her peace, or to depreciate her mission.

Constance Wachtmeister.


(Written for the Theosophical Siftings. This letter was printed in The Vahan, London, January 1, 1891, pp. 1-3)