WHAT SADHGURU SAID ABOUT KRISHNAMURTI

In the following video you can see what Sadhguru said about Jiddu Krishnamurti:

ALSIBAR ANALYSIS

Alsibar is a researcher who has studied spiritual guides extensively, and he commented on what Sadhguru said about Krishnamurti:

« Hello everyone, today we're going to talk about Sadguru and his view of Krishnamurti. Many people ask me what I think specifically about Sadguru. I haven't researched him yet, but I'll take this opportunity to discuss his statements about Krishnamurti.

Sadhguru starts by saying that Krishnamurti refused to use any method, which is true, but he also adds that Krishnamurti refused to use any parable, story, or joke, which is not true.

Anyone familiar with Krishnamurti's work will recall several anecdotes and parables he tells, some of which he even invented himself. If you'd like to learn more about the stories, parables, and jokes (some admittedly a bit lame) that Krishnamurti told, read the book "The Kitchen Chronicles: 1001 Lunches with J. Krishnamurti" by Michael Krohner, who was Krishnamurti's personal cook for many years.

Well, regarding the claim that no one understood what Krishnamurti was talking about, that's not true. Some did, but rarely.

And it's true that Krishnamurti refused to play the role of guru, to offer any kind of process. But Sadhguru makes another blunder by claiming that Krishnamurti said "it will happen anyway," because this is not true. Krishnamurti never said that, and knowing his way of thinking, I can assure you he would never have said it under any circumstances.

And Sadhguru also mentions something that is very common in Krishnamurti groups, that there is a lot of confusion, a lot of misunderstandings.

But Sadhguru makes his biggest mistake regarding Krishnamurti, saying that Krishnamurti's path is the path of intellect. He uses the correct word, jnana marga, but as far as I know, any basic student of Hinduism —well, anyone with even a minimal knowledge of Sanskrit— knows that jnana marga is about the path of wisdom, not intellect.

And Sadhguru is dishonest about Krishnamurti when he says that Krishnamurti's path is the path of intellect, which is false. Krishnamurti always criticized intellect, knowledge, and scholarship in the spiritual realm, though not in the practical realm of life.

This is one of the biggest lies Sadhguru told, which is very strange. I don't know if he did it in bad faith since he is a guru and a person who knows Indian culture and language.

Another misconception that demonstrates Sadguru's ignorance or superficial knowledge of Krishnamurti; first he says that Krishnamurti was "a fantastic person," that is, he praises him, right? And Sadguru adds that when Krishnamurti was in a place "he was a fragrance, but afterwards when Krishnamurti left only the books remained because there was no living process."

This is very similar to Osho's words about Krishnamurti. He has a phrase like this: "It gives no method," and then he says, referring to a supposed method that Krishnamurti uses, "that method will lead nobody anywhere." Which is contradictory.

Well, Sadhguru here does the same thing, first saying that Krishnamurti emitted an incredible vibration, but then adding that it only served as an intellectual exercise, which is contradictory.

But Krishnamurti also displays anything but intellectual exercise. Any beginner reader of Krishnamurti knows this; he abhorred intellect. And in so-called spiritual matters, there is nothing to do with intellectual exercise, and for Christians, absolutely nothing.

And finally, Sadhguru talks about his experience with education, saying that he really liked Krishnamurti's view on education, and that's why he enrolled his daughter in one of Krishnamurti's schools.

So what we perceive is that on the one hand Sadhguru praises Krishnamurti and on the other hand criticizes him, but it's not constructive criticism; I consider it dishonest criticism, or at least very superficial. »

CID ANALYSIS

I have observed that Sadguru makes great errors regarding Indian spiritual doctrine, which shows that he is quite ignorant of his native teaching, and his mistake of defining jnana marga (also called jnana yoga) as the path of the intellect instead of the path of spiritual knowledge, is further proof of his spiritual uneducation.

And I have also observed that Sadguru investigates superficially; for example, in his speech he said that Khalil Gibran entered the room where Krishnamurti was, but in reality it was the other way around, and Khalil Gibran related that it was Krishnamurti who entered the room where he was.

And I also note that Sadguru makes many mistakes and tells many lies. Here Alsibar detailed the mistakes and lies that Sadguru told regarding Krishnamurti, and I have published two articles where I detailed the mistakes and lies that Sadguru told regarding Blavatsky, Leadbeater, Besant and the Theosophical Society.

And finally, I note that Sadhguru (like Osho) displays a combination of admiration and contemptuous criticism about Krishnamurti. But as Alsibar demonstrated, his criticism is unfounded, and as for his praise, I consider it hypocritical, motivated more by Krishnamurti's fame than by genuine admiration, since Krishnamurti was strongly against deceitful and abusive gurus, and both Osho and Sadhguru are that type of guru.

BBC CARLOS CASTANEDA DOCUMENTARY

The BBC is the UK's public service broadcaster, and in 2006 it produced and broadcast a documentary about Carlos Castaneda, which you can see in the following videos:

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE ACTIVATION OF KRISHNAMURTI'S THIRD EYE

In August 1922, Jiddu Krishnamurti experienced a powerful and mysterious phenomenon that would change his life forever. This strange event was witnessed by the people who lived with him and were responsible for his safety and well-being.

The following account was provided by his friend and biographer Pupul Jayakar in her book "J. Krishnamurti - A Biography."

The detailed description of the phenomenon was given by Krishnamurti's younger brother, Nitya, who was present during these events and periodically sent letters to Annie Besant and Charles Leadbeater, reporting on these events, which would later become known as the Krishnamurti Process.

This is a description of Pupul Jayakar:

« The process, which could not be explained by Leadbeater or Mrs. Besant, was to continue intermittently in the months that followed. His body would be racked with pain, it would thrash around, and at times would hit the floor.

Krishnamurti often had to send his brother and whoever else was present out of the room, for they found it difficult to witness his agony. He would taint repeatedly, and at the end of it he would look excessively tired.

In 1924 Krishna and some companions went abroad, where the experiences continued. Toward the end of his terrible pain he beheld visions of the Buddha, Maitreya, and the other Masters of the occult hierarchy.

Nitya, deeply perplexed, wrote to Annie Besant on March 24 from Ojai on their return from Pergine, Italy:

« Krishna's process has now taken a definite step forward. The other night, it began as usual, none of us expecting anything fresh or new. All of a sudden, we all felt an immense rush of power in the house, greater than I have ever felt since we have been here; Krishna saw the Lord and the Master; I think also the star shone out that night, for all of us felt an intense sense of awe and almost fear that I felt before when the star came out.

Krishna afterwards told us that the current started as usual at the base of his spine and reached the base of his neck, then one went on the left side, the other on the right side of his head and they eventually met at the centre of the forehead; when they met a flame played out of his forehead.

That is the bare outline of what happened; none of us know what it means but the power was so immense that night that it seems to mark a definite stage. I presume it should mean the opening of the third eye. »

Except for fhe vision of "The Lord," the rest is a classic description of the arousing of the kundalini. »

(End of chapter 4)

OBSERVATION

I suspect that in order to prevent the Theosophical Society of Adyar from becoming a vast Adventist sect, the trans-Himalayan masters encouraged Krishnamurti's spiritual enlightenment process, and in part that consisted of activating Krishnamurti's third eye, but that was done at a higher level.

Activating the third eye at a more phenomenal level, a lower level allows one to perceive the astral world, while at a higher level, a more spiritual level it increases a greater understanding of existence.

And since Krishnamurti showed more of that quality after this event, that's why I believe that his Ajna chakra was activated on a spiritual level.