THE LEVEL OF THE MASTERS ACCORDING TO GUY BALLARD

 

 

 

 

 

Kuthumi and Morya

 

Regarding the level of development of the masters Kuthumi and Morya, Guy Ballard in one of his texts claimed that these two masters had said that when they founded the Theosophical Society through their messenger Madame Blavatsky:

 

"They had not ascended then" and "they could only go so far." (pp. 317 and 334, AML)

 

 

But the reality is that with the exception of Jesus, almost no master has yet ascended (even the highest ones) and so for example the master Serapis who is the chief of Kuthumi and Morya, indicated that he was still a man with a physical body.

 

“The time has come for you to know who I am. I am not a disembodied spirit, brother. I am a living man.” (Letter to Colonel Olcott received June 22, 1875)

 

 

As for the supposed statement that masters Kuthumi and Morya could only go so far, that is also false because all masters can continue to advance and their development depends only on their efforts.

 

But historical data also show that the masters Kuthumi and Morya were already very advanced.

 

In October 1881 Master Kuthumi underwent an initiation, and on this matter Blavatsky commented:

 

“Kuthumi has gone to sleep for three months to prepare during his Sumadhi or continuous trance state for his initiation, which is the penultimate one, when he will become one of the highest Adepts.” (Letter to Mrs. Mary Hollis Billings sent October 2, 1881)

 

 

And about the level that Master Morya had, Kuthumi pointed out that:

 

“He is better and more powerful than I” (Letter to Mr. Hume received June 30, 1882)

 

 

And the incredible phenomena that Blavatsky produced with the help of Kuthumi and Morya show that indeed these two masters already had their powers very developed:

 

·       The occult phenomena that Blavatsky produced on October 3, 1880

·       Blavatsky materialized a cup, a saucer, a diploma and water

·       The ancient lost brooch that Blavatsky materialized

·       The brooch that Kuthumi materialized with the assistance of Blavatsky

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saint-Germain

 

Regarding the Count of Saint-Germain, Guy Ballard in one of his texts claimed that the masters Kuthumi and Morya admitted that:

 

“Our Beloved Saint Germain has accomplished more in three years than We have accomplished in the many years of Our humble efforts.” (p. 323, AML)

 

 

But this is also false because Blavatsky specified that Saint-Germain had only been a disciple of the masters. On this matter she wrote:

 

“For centuries, the natural selection of disciples by the Mahatmas of the Himalayas has been in the temples and to a lesser extent among the inhabitants of Tibet where there were a considerable number of natural mystics.

 

But the exceptions have been the cases of Western men such as Fludd, Thomas Vaughan, Paracelsus, Pico della Mirandola, the Count of Saint-Germain, etc., whose great personal affinity to celestial science forced distant Adepts to establish relations with them, and to give them a proportion of the occult knowledge that the Masters protect to the extent that it was possible for those Western occultists in their social environment.” (Collected Writings IV, p.607)

 

 

And the historical data indicate that the Count of Saint-Germain was a less advanced disciple than Blavatsky, because while there are numerous testimonies that assure that Blavatsky could already produce paranormal phenomena by herself without the help of the masters, on the other hand there is no serious testimony that says the same about Saint Germain, which shows that the count had not yet developed his powers.

 

Saint-Germain died at the end of the 18th century, and it is most likely that the count's soul is still in the Devachan, because theosophical instructors explained that humans take on average 1’500 years before reincarnating again.

 

And the Count of Saint-Germain still has a long way to go before he becomes a Master because theosophical instructors also pointed out that on average it takes seven reincarnations for a novice disciple to become a great master.

 

 

It was the liar Charles Leadbeater who, in his great ignorance of Theosophy, invented that the Count of Saint-Germain had already been reincarnated in the 20th century in the person of Ferdinand von Hompesch (who was the 71st Grand Master of the Order of Malta), and had become “Master Rakoczi, director of the seventh ray and head of all Freemasons.” But all of those claims were falsehoods invented by that trickster.

 

And Guy Ballard in his immense ignorance and charlatanism, took up the lies that Leadbeater told and added more falsehoods to the matter by adding that Master Saint-Germain had already ascended and had met him on Mount Shasta.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

And this is further proof of how the assertions made by Guy Ballard are completely false.