Robert A.
Herrmann is a Christian who wrote the following article about Alice Bailey, and in purple I added my comments.
[Note: This is a slight revision of
my original 1982 article. The exhibits and quotations used are in accordance
with the Fair Use doctrine of the copyright law relative to criticism,
teaching, education, scholarship and research. Much of the material quoted and
some exhibits were supplied free-of-charge, and all material quoted or
displayed is available to the general public. What is presented here will seem
to some who have no belief in the supernatural or who have the belief that
humanity is endowed with non supernatural but extrasensory powers as utter
nonsense. Hence, if this applies to you, please do not read any further for
your presuppositions preclude you from having any comprehension of the
following material.]
Abstract: Terms such as the New Age and
similar expressions are used to express a particular form of ethical or
"theological" doctrine stated in the writings of Alice A. Bailey. The
terms used by Bailey and others are, at this time, being, and they will
continue to be, altered. However, the concepts expressed within her theology
have not and will not be altered. These concepts are the major concern of this
investigation.
Many manifestations of this theology
are covert. The covertly controlled individuals or organizations often us
different code words, deny that they are associated with "diabolic"
forces; but, they do promulgate the same materialistic Bailey philosophy. As
one example, organizations that attempt to build, create, or produce
"God's kingdom" on earth are often covertly controlled by Bailey's
god and claim no association with other such groups that overtly follow
Bailey's theology.
The overt manifestations tend to
vary but still follow the patterns dictated by Bailey. For example, consider
the emphasis today upon various "psychic" endeavors. These are all
associated, covertly or overtly, with Bailey's theology. This doctrine, in
whole or in part, has exceptional appeal and is being embraced by many
individuals and organizations who are being deceived relative to its true
intent. Those individuals most likely to accept portions, if not all, of
Bailey's doctrine are those who believe in "psychic" powers, where
such powers are considered as either relative to spirit beings or produced by
extranatural processes not associated with spirit beings. Further, the liberal
Christian community will consider Bailey's supernaturalism as harmless and will
tend to embrace this Bailey doctrine since it affirms the concepts of
"ecumenicalism" or the belief that all theologies are converging to a
universe doctrine.
The atheistic community considers
Bailey's supernaturalism as harmless and is embracing Bailey's concepts due to
her desire to destroy orthodox religions, in general, and use their resources
for, what she considers to be, the "true" benefit of humankind. Due
to Bailey's dislike for orthodox Judaism and conservative Christianity, her
theology will be accepted by many Moslems for this specific reason. Since the
technical aspect of her theology is based upon Buddhism and Hinduism,
individuals who assert these beliefs are easily converted to the Bailey
mysticism. Those individuals who are the least likely to accept Bailey's New
Age theology are orthodox Jewish and conservative Christians who accept the
Bible in its fundamental first century interpretation.
Due to the factors stated above, it
is important that the public be made aware of the true nature of the Bailey
"theology." Using the writings of the founder of the New Age
theology, a theology that is purposely disguised through application of code
words, it is shown in this article that this theology is, in all of its
variations, absolutely occult in character and leads to one of the most evil
forms of demonic possession. This theology is designed to prepare humankind for
the "appearance," in one form or another, of the Antichrist. Some of
the actual methods used to produce such demon possession are discussed. It is
established that the true leader of the New Age movement, Bailey's god, is the
Scripturally defined Adversary (Satan) and that the "prayer" entitled
"The Great Invocation" is actually a satanic invocation designed to
call forth the Antichrist.
CONTENTS
0.
Scientific Method Employed
1.
Introduction and Brief History
2.
The Masters and Overshadowing
3.
Master Jesus, Bailey's Christ and God
4.
The Solar Angels and Humanity
5.
From Bethlehem to Calvary
6.
Methodology and the Kingdom of God
7.
The New Age [Bailey] Ethics
8.
The Greatest Danger
9. The Plan, More Code Words and
the Great Invocation
10.
References
11.
Internet Examples
0. Scientific Method Employed
The scientific method employed is
generally termed probabilistic analytical reasoning. In particular, the
following procedures are followed: A particular Bailey term or phrase A
that denotes an entity or concept is considered. Within the Bailey writings A
has an associated collection of describing sentences, A's describing
set. Statements in this set describe such things as A's behavior, or
attributes or relations with other terms or phrases. Within the Scriptures, as
they would be interpreted when first written, a term or phrase B that
denotes an entity or concept is located which has a describing set that is
highly similar to the Bailey describing set for A. The more closely
Bailey's describing set corresponds to the Scriptural describing set and the
greater the number of such corresponding sentences within the sets, leads to an
identification of the Bailey term or phrase with the Scriptural term or phrase
(i.e. A = B).
On the other hand, using the same
approach, if Bailey's describing sentences for A do not correspond in
this probabilistic sense to the describing sentences for the Scripturally
described B, then this leads to the conclusion that A and B
do not denote the same entity or concept. In a few cases, my experience with
the occult is used to clarify particular concepts and this has adjoined
additional information to a describing set. A vast amount of mathematical
analysis can be done using describing sets.
[Important added note. In this
analysis, it will be established that it is dangerous for an individual or
organization to adhere partially to Bailey's theology due to the actual
controlling influences that govern even those aspects that may appear as
entirely harmless. When an important Bailey concept is first presented, it will
be setoff by use of two * symbols.]
In Oct. 1982, the Lucis Trust
published in the Reader's Digest a full page advertisement called "The Great Invocation." This scientific analysis is
a detailed exposition of the significance of this advertisement.
The "flower" pictured in
this advertisement is one of the many "Lotuses" employed in occult
symbolism (Exhibit 1, (2, p. 823)). The "Great
Invocation" is actually the third of a series of invocations written from
1935 through 1945 (Exhibit 2 (6, p. v)). This is the same as the
one that has appeared on the Internet at http://www.lucistrust.org and has not been altered from the
last one in Exhibit 2. In what follows, you will not only
be exposed to the true occult concepts and practices used today, but also the
basic method used to control even those individuals who do not believe in the
supernatural - the method of occult *overshadowing*. But, before proceeding, we
present a brief history of the individuals involved with the creation of the
"Great Invocation."
Alice A. Bailey (abbr.
A.A.B.) (1880 -1949) and Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (H.P.B.) (1831 - 91) are
apparently the founders of the New Age or Aquarian Age movement
(1, p. 255) which today is linked to well over 10,000 organizations within the
U. S. A. alone. As stated by Bailey, the preparatory period was from 1875-1890
and the teachings where preparatory and ". . . written down by
H.P.B." (1, p. 255). The intermediate teachings were ". . . given
1919-1949 . . . written down by A.A.B." (1, p. 255). "Other teachings
will be . . . emerging after 1975 . . . to be given on a world wide scale via
radio." (1, p. 255).
Bailey writes that H.P.B. was
"That great disciple who lighted her torch in the East and brought the
light to Europe and America in 1875." (2, Dedication). However, unbiased
scholars give the following assessment of H.P.B. First, she ". . . claims
to have mediumistic powers." (3, p. 55). Her control was John King "a
spirit claiming to have been in life the famous pirate Henry Morgan." (3,
p. 131). Moreover, Bailey admits that H.P.B. was, at the least, a conscious
medium.
"In fifty years time, the need
for true psychics and conscious mediums (such as H.P.B., for instance) will be
very great . . . ." (2, p. 757).
H.P.B. founded the well-known occult
society the Theosophical Society in New York City on 13 Sept. 1875 (3,
p. 248). She apparently was an assistant to a spirit medium and had a
well-known hatred for Christianity (3, p. 249). She faked seances and made experiments
with hashish prior to the founding of the Theosophical Society. During the
period 1875 - 1890, her activities were investigated by the Society for
Psychical Research. Richard Hodgson reported that H.P.B.'s Theosophical
Society utilized conjuror's apparatuses such as "shrines" with false
backs and the like (3, p. 250). The Society for Psychical Research described
H.P.B. as "one of the most accomplished, ingenious and interesting
impostors of history." (3, p. 55). Apparently, after this investigation,
she concentrated upon being a "conscious" or "mental"
medium.
(We cannot trust in what Richard Hodgson claimed because various
investigators have demonstrated that he was not impartial, as he only accepted
the accusations made against Blavatsky and rejected all evidence that showed
her authenticity, and that is why subsequently, the Society for Psychical Research itself rejected the Hodgson report,
see link.)
A "mental medium" receives
communication by various types of extrasensory perception. Relative to this
present day, from my experience, these are the only procedures that have any
merit. In the case of H.P.B., after the methods of "apport" were
exposed, she concentrated upon telepathy as received from one of the Masters
about whom a great deal more will be detailed. This *telepathic procedure*
utilizes the "seer" approach where an individual transcribes
information received be "reading" from the "astral light."
This may be more simply described as ordinary telepathic information being
received from "some" source that can control human mental
impressions.
(Although Blavatsky had
mediumistic powers, she adamantly rejected spiritism stating that it is
harmful, while Bailey instead promoted it, see link.)
Alice A. Bailey became associated
with the Theosophical Society and studied intensely occult methodology and its
technical language. She left the Theosophical Society for a
". . . Teaching on the New
Discipleship . . . . This changed technique negates the old attitudes such as
that portrayed in the Theosophical literature . . . . That earlier presentation
was useful but has now served its purpose." (2, pp. 251 - 252.
According to Foster Bailey, A.A.B.'s
second husband, A.A.B. began her "telepathic" work in 1919 (2, p.
vi). This telepathic collaboration with her "Tibetan" (to be further
delineated) lasted 30 years and, indeed, we are told that
"During the long course of the
work the minds of the Tibetan and A.A.B. became so closely attuned that they
were in effect . . . a single joint projecting mechanism." (2, p. vii).
In the year 1922, A.A.B. founded the
Lucifer Publishing Co. that later that same year was incorporated in New
Jersey as the <="" b=""> "A non-profit
educational corporation" under its new name the Lucis Publishing Co.
This publishing company is now part of the Lucis Trust. This is attested
to by the library card catalogs and holdings that can be found in Vol. 30,
Mansell, 1969, The National Union Catalog Pre-1956 Imprints page 473. (Exhibit 3). The twenty-four not independent books written by
Bailey are the basic textbooks for the New World Order (4, pp. 190-192)
or what some call the New Age, the New Religion, the New this or
the New that. Much of the direct evidence is taken from five of the most
important of these textbooks as listed in the references. Indeed, there is such
a vast amount of evidence that it is difficult to know exactly where to start.
Foster Bailey writes,
"A Treatise on Cosmic Fires
[Reference 2] . . . carries inherent evidence that it will stand as the major
and most far-reaching portion of the thirty-year teachings . . . ."(2, p.
vi).
This "treatise" is almost
entirely astrology and spiritualism in a modern mode. We are also told that the
book "The Rays and The Initiations" is to be utilized as a school
text for advanced initiates. Moreover, a major and continuing effort must be
the wide distribution of these New Age Bailey books throughout the entire world
(TMW, pp. 6-7). As an indication of this wide distribution, the
"textbooks" have been translated from English into Spanish, Dutch,
German, Greek, Italian, Russian, Polish and Portuguese. The Lucis Trust has, at
the least, three worldwide offices in New York, London and Geneva. (TMW).
The concept of the Masters,
Masters of Wisdom, the Unknown Chiefs, the Secret Chiefs, Brothers and all
other such synonyms can be traced back approximately to 1750 and the
Spanish-French occultist the Martine's de Pasqually (1715?-1779). The
term Secret Chiefs was introduced by Baron Hund (1722 - 1776) for his Strikt
Observanz Masonic system. The basic approach is an *evolutionary
approach where an individual spiritually evolves* into higher and more
meaningful forms until one actually becomes totally a spirit being on various
evolutionary levels. Further, Pasqually apparently introduced the human biological
evolution concept prior to Darwin's expanding it to other biological entities.
"Masters" is an interesting concept especially when one considers the
historical period when the concept was first advanced publicly. The
"Masters" concept has been employed by the theosophists and other
"seers" for over 200 years. The Masters form a major portion of the
occult mysteries of Blavatsky, Bailey, Olcott, Crowley, Leadbeater, Besant and
hundreds of other occultists of lesser fame. The "theology" that the
Masters "teach" is widespread. It is a major part of many large
"religious" organizations. One such organization is the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints.
A Master can be defined basically as
a perfected man or adept whose task it was (or is) to watch over and guide
humanity along its path of spiritual and physical evolution - with
concentration on the spiritual. Spiritual always refers to supernatural
spirituality. Masters are godlike adepts with their "physical plane"
headquarters in various mountain areas especially in the Himalayas and Tibet.
The Lucis Trust steadfastly claims that it is a fact that the Masters exist on
this physical plane and even on the "dense physical plane" (i.e. the
natural universe). (GI, p.9). However, unbiased investigation, even after
expeditions to Tibet, have failed to produce a modern manifestation of a Master
in dense physical form.
It is not the purpose of this
research to discuss these "adepts" in any detail. This investigation
is intended to relate the occult meanings of the entities symbolized within
"The Great Invocation" to their Christian or Judaic counterparts if
such exist. Thus, except for names and the like, a subsidiary analysis of the
Masters that are not claimed to be associated with Judeo-Christian theology
will not be specifically undertaken. It should be pointed out, however, that
the Masters concept as it is utilized at present is obviously an attempt to
avoid the charge that the telepathic communication with the Masters is
communication with the "dead." However, as it will be established,
the attempt to convince the skeptic that the telepathic communication is not a
direct result of a subliminal implanting of the thought patterns from some
supernatural spiritual entity is doomed to failure since Bailey writes that
this is one of the major intentions of the initiation process. This is found
when the Wesek festival is discussed. In this discussion, Bailey also
gives the actual procedures being used, at this very moment, to overshadow
specially selected individuals. Some care should be exercised when reading the
following since a few of the words are "code" words and do not carry
the standard meaning. In particular, the words or phrases are "pure,
servers of the race, inspiration, His Lord, Great Lord, His Master." I
have added a few remarks denoted by [ . . . ]. Please pay particular attention
to Bailey's description of the first stage of overshadowing.
". . . many cases of overshadowing
will be seen and will demonstrate in a three fold manner . . . . .prepared
disciples and highly evolved men and women, will be found who will be doing the
work along the lines intended, one who will be occupying places of prominence
which will make them available for the reaching of the many; their bodies will
also be sufficiently pure to permit of the overshadowing. It will only be
possible in the case of those who have been consecrated since childhood [as I
was], who have been servers all their lives or who, in previous lives . . .
[Yes, the concept of *reincarnation* is a basic requirement of the New
Religion.] First. *An impression upon the physical brain of the man or
women, of thoughts, plans for work, ideals* . . . which (emanating from the
Avatar [Hindu: An incarnation of a deity in physical (earthly) form]) *will yet
be unrecognised by him* [This is a very important aspect of overshadowing.] . .
. .This is literally a form of higher telepathy . . . . Second. The
overshadowing of the chela [Hindu for disciple] during his work (such as
lecturing, writing, or teaching) and his illumination for service. He will be
conscious of this . . . and will seek more and more to be available for use,
rendering himself up in utter selflessness to the inspiration of His Lord. Third.
The conscious co-operation of the chela is necessitated in the third method of
overshadowing. In this case, he will (. . . ) surrender himself and step out of
his physical body, handing it over for the use of the Great Lord or one of His
Masters . . . he renders up his body, and stands aside for a specific length of
time." (2, p. 756-757).
Certain portions of the above Bailey
description can be related slightly to the Christian concept of being
"indwelt by the Holy Spirit" on various spiritual levels. However,
type three corresponds more closely to the concept of "being possessed by
a spirit entity." An Avatar is definitely a spirit being.
"All Avatars in the strict
sense of the word are liberated souls . . . a Master in physical plane
incarnation is a type of avatar for He is a 'free soul' and therefore only is
incarnate for specific purposes." (2, p. 722).
From the Christian perspective,
among others, the only non-demonic (supernatural) spirit that overshadows is
the Holy Spirit. "That is to say, the exalted Christ is now experienced
in, through and as Spirit. Christ now cannot be experienced apart from the
Spirit: the Spirit is the medium of union between Christ and the believer (1
Cor 6:17)." (5, p. 703). We also have ". . . the Spirit is conformed
to the character and work of Christ and only that spirit which displays that
character and testifies to Jesus the Christ is to be recognized as the Spirit
of God. (1 John 4:1-3, 6; 5:6-8)" (5, p. 704). Hence, the basic Christian
doctrine implies that any Avatar or the like that is not a manifestation of the
Holy Spirit, can only overshadow (possess) an individual by means of a
Scripturally defined demonic (evil) spirit or the spirit of the antichrist. (1
John 4:1-3).
In the next section, it will be
easily demonstrated that the only entity that could have supernaturally indwelt
the New Testament Jesus in any manner whatsoever is not the same entity
that indwells any of Bailey's Masters, including Master Jesus. Further,
statements written by Bailey will show, beyond any doubt, that she and
individuals that accept any major aspect of her theology are the Scripturally
define antichrists (1 John 2:22).
[Note: In this analysis, the term
"demon" will often be used both as a noun, adjective, and as an
adverb.]
Bailey's second Master has the name Master
Djwhal Khul or simply Master D. K. Moreover, "he" also is
called by the more familiar name - The Tibetan. Bailey almost always
writes as if she is taking dictation from her Master.
"A.A.B. takes down to my
dictation an average of seven to twelve pages of typing (single-spaced) each
time she writes for me; but owing to the exigencies of my work I cannot dictate
to her every day, though I have found that she would gladly take my dictation
daily if I so desired; . . . " (1, p. 251). [Master D. K.] ". . . is
the latest of the adepts taking initiation, having taken the fifth initiation
in 1875, and is therefore occupying the same body in which He took the
initiation . . . . His body is not a young one, and He is a Tibetan." (4,
p. 57).
Bailey gives more descriptions of
Masters in the chapter The Lodge of Masters to be found in reference 4.
Further,
"The Master, however, can build
a body through which He can approach incoming disciples . . . . He will
normally build this body in semblance of the human form, doing so
instantaneously [sudden appearance] and by an act of the will, when
required." (1, p. 705).
Bailey lists in her various books
other members of the Hierarchy. There is Master Jupiter, Master Morya,
Master Koot Humi (of Kasmiric origin), Master Jesus (the Master
Bailey claims that the Christians follow), Master Rakoczi (who has a
home in the Carpathian mountains). Indeed, Bailey informs us that Master R.
overshadowed Comte de St. Germain, Roger and Francis Bacon. We are told that he
is called "the Count." [I wonder how this relates to Bram Stoker's
"Count."] Then for science there is Master Hilarion, who was
as ". . . an earlier incarnation . . . Paul of Tarsus." In 1922,
Master H. occupied a Cretan body. There was the Master Serapis, Master R. and
many others. (4, p. 53-61). Exhibit 4 (4, p. 48-49) is a key diagram that
shows various Masters and their relation to the Great Lords, Sanat
Kumara, Solar Logos and others. The line diagram on page 48
indicates the inner relations for these spirit forms.
(There are many witnesses who claimed to have seen the Transhimalayan
masters, see link. But later a liar named Charles Leadbeater invented fictional masters
such as "Master Jupiter," “Master R”, or "the Venetian Master"
see link, and he also made up many lies about the masters and the planetary
hierarchy. And
Alice Bailey copied all those lies, so there is no point arguing about what she
said about it, since 90% of her claims on these topics are falsehoods.)
The particular Masters in which we
are interested, both in their supernatural and dense physical plane
manifestations, form a portion of the Planetary Hierarchy. This
Hierarchy will be discussed shortly. Our immediate concern, however, is with
the identity of Bailey's Master Jesus. Bailey tells us that in 1922,
"Master M., the Master K. H.
and the Master Jesus are interesting Themselves closely with the work of
unifying, as far as may be, eastern and western thought, so that the great religions
of the East, with the later development of Christian faith in all its many
branches, may mutually benefit each other. Thus eventually it is hoped one
great universal Church may come into being." (4, p. 55-56).
Now Master D. K. (through Bailey) tells
us that Master Jesus
". . . is presently [1922]
living in a Syrian body, and dwells in a certain part of the Holy Land . . . .
His pupils are frequently distinguished by fanaticism . . . . He is tall and
spare with rather a long thin face, black hair, pale complexion and piercing
blue eyes . . . . He is well-known in Bible history, coming before us first as
Joshua the Son of Nun, appearing in the time of Ezra as Jeshua, taking the
third initiation, as related in the book of Zechariah, as Joshua, and in the
Gospel story He is known for two great sacrifices that in which He handed over
His body for the use of the Christ . . . . As Appollonius of Tyana, He took the
fifth initiation . . . ."(4, p. 56). [Bailey writes,] ". . . the
Mahommedan faith will be found linked to the Christian faith because it
embodies the work of Master Jesus as He overshadowed one of His senior
disciples, a very advanced initiate, Mahomet." (1, p. 254).
*Bailey claims that Master Jesus and
the Jesus of the New Testament are one and the same*. She writes, ". . .
The Master Jesus, the inspirer and director of the Christian Church everywhere
. . . ."(4, p. 46). Further, ". . . this can be noted in the Gospel
story . . . of the Master Jesus." (6, p. 83). Clearly, Bailey's intent is
to correspond Master Jesus to Jesus Christ. For more direct evidence, Bailey
states
"Christianity will be in a
state of chaotic division and upheavals. When this takes place . . ., the
Master Jesus will take certain initial steps towards reassuming control of His
Church, . . . " (6, p. 573).
Numerous other references can be
cited that immediately lead to the conclusion that Bailey would like us to
believe that her Master Jesus that appears in position 6 under the direction of
(c) the Venetian Master and controlled by (C) that Mahachohan in Exhibit 4, page 49, is the Christ Jesus. Observe also that on
page 48, Master Jesus is connected to The Bodhisattva (The Christ, The World
Teacher). Please note that according to the diagram, Master Jesus is only a
"far-away" disciple of the Bailey's christ and, as will be
specifically shown, *Master Jesus is not the Christ Himself as the concept is
Scripturally defined*. However, the most important and, indeed, absolute evidence
where Bailey attempts to establish that Jesus Christ is the same as her Master
Jesus is the entire book From Bethlehem to Calvary; the Initiations of Jesus
written without the aid, we are told, of Master D. K. This will be analyzed
shortly.
First, it is necessary to consider
the Planetary Hierarchy and to identify Bailey's "Christ" and
Bailey's orthodox God. Notice that in Exhibit 4, Sanat Kumara, the *Lord of the World* (The
Ancient of Days, the One Initiator) appears at the top of the spirit
entities for the Planetary Hierarchy. Below Sanat Kumara in influence is the
Bodhisattva (the "Christ"). Further, below we find Master Jesus. Once
the identify of Bailey's Sanat Kumara is determined, then the identify of all
of the other spirit beings controlled by this entity will become clear.
The original Sanat Kumara is the
mind-born son of the Hindu god Brahma. Brahma is the creator god who was later
joined by Visnu and Siva and these form the Hindu trinity. Bailey equates the
Christian concepts of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit with the Hindu
gods Siva, Visnu and Brahma, respectively. However, the Hindu trinity form
distinctly different gods and it is required that they be worshiped in idol form.
The idol representation of Brahma has four heads and four arms, for example (2,
p. 36). It is also important to this analysis that the Masters, the Great
Lords (in this case, the Manu, Bodhisattva and Mahachohan) as well as Sanat
Kumara and his brothers (the Three Kumaras) have achieved this purely
spirit or semi-spirit positions through various occult initiations processes.
In many cases, Bailey claims that this supernatural process is the counterpart
of the ordinary secular evolutionary models for the physical universe. However,
Bailey's process has a special variation.
As an example, Bailey's description
for Sanat Kumara states that
"The Planetary Logos [a spirit
form] of our earth scheme, one of the Seven Spirits before the throne, took
physical incarnation, and, under the form of Sanat Kumara, the Ancient of Days,
the Lord of the World, came down to this dense physical planet and has remained
with us ever since. Owing to the extreme purity of His nature and the fact that
He is (from the human standpoint) relatively sinless, and hence incapable of
response to aught on the dense physical plane, He was unable to take a dense
physical body such as ours, and has to function in His etheric body." (4,
p. 28).
[Note: Once we identify Sanat
Kumara, the meaning of the term "pure" will also be very clear.]
Further, we learn that with the Sanat Kumara there ". . . come a group of
other highly evolved Entities, who represent His own individual karmic group
and those who are the outcome of the triple nature of the Planetary
Logos." (4, p. 29).
In order to place these spirit
entities in their proper linear perspective, please refer to Exhibit 5 (2, p. 293). This shows the evolution of the Universe
(spiritually) as it "now" appears. From the Unknown or as
Bailey writes it "ONE ABOUT WHOM NAUGHT MAY BE SAID" we have seven
spirits of the highest order, the Cosmic Logi. Under each Cosmic Logos
are seven Solar Logi and under each Solar Logos are seven Heavenly
Men. The earth's Heavenly Man is Sanat Kumara. Bailey tells us that 18
million years ago Sanat Kumara appeared on the scene (4, p. 28). However, we
are explicitly told that many of these spirit entities obtained their lofty
positions through general evolutionary processes (4, p. 13) and many
started as human beings (4, p. 222).
At this point, we can now easily
identify Sanat Kumara. First, Bailey employs many distinct synonyms for Sanat
Kumara throughout her writings. He is claimed to be Sanat Kumara, the Ancient
of Days and The Lord of the World as well as the Youth of Endless
Summers (4, p. 28, 38). Bailey claims that Sanat Kumara is the entity that
the orthodox Christians call God (6, p. 465). Also, the Ancient of Days, the
One Initiator, is claimed to refer to the Old Testament God. The other synonyms
Bailey uses are from Hinduism.
Obviously, for a hundred different
reasons, Sanat Kumara does not correspond to the Ancient of Days as
described in the Scriptures. Sanat Kumara does not exhibit the most outstanding
attributes of the God - Jehovah. The claim that Sanat Kumara is not the one and
only one creator God, the God of everything, (indeed, Bailey's Unknown)
immediately eliminates Sanat Kumara as being the Old Testament Ancient of Days.
Further, the claim that Sanat Kumara also corresponds to a major deity of an
idolatrous religion is yet another of many, many reasons why this spirit being
is not, but would like to be, the Old Testament God. The claim that he is the
orthodox God of Christianity falls for the same reasons among many, many
others. This leaves use with the title that Bailey uses more than any other -
The Lord of the World. This can be directly translated to be the Scripturally
described created spirit entity called the Adversary, Satan, the Devil
(9, p. 523). Hence, whenever Bailey and the followers of her theology use the
term "God" in a Judeo-Christian context they mean the Scripturally
defined spirit being called Satan. I also point out that the original name
given to Bailey's publishing company was the Lucifer Publishing Company
who is a ruler of a planetary center (Exhibit 9 (6, 107)).
It is apparently true that in early
Rabbinic usage "Lord of the World" or "King of the World"
is synonyms with God. But in the Scriptures as they have been accepted for
2,000 years, and especially in the New Testament, Lord of the World is
absolutely synonymous with the term Adversary (Satan). It is also interesting
to point out that in all of the Scriptural quotations employed by Bailey she
apparently never quotes Luke 4:6 - 7 relative to the "world".
"And the devil said unto him,
All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for this is delivered
unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me,
all shall be thine"
Now that the evidence indicates that
Bailey's Sanat Kumara is the Adversary, the next step is to identify Bailey's
christ and determine whether he corresponds, in any manner whatsoever, to the
Christ of the Scriptures. Note that the spirit entity The Bodhisattva is
the department head of the Sanat Kumara's Love-Wisdom aspect and Bailey
defines The Bodhisattva as "The Lord Maitreya, Who is known in the
occident as the Christ . . . . The Bodhisattva is the Head of all religions of
the world." (4, p. 216). This is also stated in the World Goodwill Web
page where the *Bailey's "Christ" is claimed to carry names as they
have been given him in various religions such as "The Lord Mitreya,
Krishna, the Imam Mahdi and the Messiah."* Since Bailey's christ has not
as yet made an appearance in physical form, then Bailey christ is, obviously,
not Christ Jesus. Bailey's "Christ" has attributes of idolatry and
also comes about by reincarnation since the Lord Maitreya is to be in a
physical manifestation the fifth reincarnation of Buddha (3). Hence, it
is certainly not the Messiah of the Old Testament. Bailey actually states that
her *"Christ" is not the entity that differentiates
Christianity from all other world religions*.
"The Tibetan has asked me to
make clear that when he is speaking of the Christ he is referring to His
official name as Head of the Hierarchy. The Christ . . . ; He does not belong
to the Christian world any more than to the Buddhist, the Mohammedan or any
faith. There is no need for any man to join the Christian Church in order to be
affiliated with the Christ." (6, p. 558 (footnote)).
Of course, from a New Testament
viewpoint, Bailey's Christ has attributes that directly contradict the
attributes and statements made by Jesus and all of His Apostles. Further, since
she specifically denies that the New Testament Jesus is the Christ, and the
Master Jesus is but a disciple of the true "Christ," then she and any
individual who follows this aspect of her theology, in any manner whatsoever,
is an antichrist. Since it is rather obvious that Sanat Kumara is the
Adversary, then Bailey would have done under the guise of love and wisdom what
such great Satanists as Aleister Crowley did not attempt to do. Since Masters
are produced by the occult process of overshadowing and *Bailey claims that the
Master Jesus established the Christian Church*, then Bailey may have committed
the very serious Biblical sin of implying that Jesus the Nazarene was indwelt
by a demon or satanic spirit. Due to the seriousness of this Scriptural sin,
more direct evidence needs to be developed. (For more evidence relative to the
Bailey's "Christ," see section 7.)
(What Alice Bailey says about
Jesus, Christ, Sanat Kumara, Maitreya, the Bodhisattva, the World Teacher, etc,
are also lies that she copied from Leadbeater, see link. And therefore it is not worth arguing about it, because her
explanations are many falsehoods.)
The Bailey category of Deva
(angles) has many subdivisions and these subdivisions carry many names such as the
greater or the lesser Builders (4, p. 217). The greater Builders are
categorized as the Solar Pitris (Hindu: semi-Divine deceased
forefather), Agnishvattas, (2, p. 679) and Fire Devas (2, p.
679). The lesser Builders are called such things as the Lunar Pitris (2.
p. 612-613). It will be noticed that on page 682 of reference 2 (Exhibit 6 ) that Bailey has expanded H.P.B.'s terminology
somewhat to include Solar Pitris as a Solar Angel. Apparently H.P.B.
considers Pitris only to be "Lunar" or a lower aspect. It is much
more important, however, to consider H.P.B.'s terminology that appears in the
footnote on page 614 of reference 2. (Exhibit 7) H.P.B. calls Solar Angles, Solar Gods. They
give humankind two "principles" the Lower mind and Higher
mind. Then on page 950 of reference 2 (Exhibit 8), Bailey gives us the exact description for the Solar
Angles (i.e. Solar Gods) as stated in the Secret Doctrine of H.P.B. They
are the Fallen Angles. Further, they are the Serpents of Wisdom
as well as having a nature of Knowledge and Love. Once again observe
that the ruler of the "Humanity" department of the Planetary
Hierarchy is Lucifer. (Exhibit 9)
For what purposes are the Fallen Angles
employed? We are told that
"The work of the Agnishvattas
[Fallen Angles] . . . is to unit the higher three principles - atma, buddhi,
manas and the lower three, and thus become in very truth the middle principle
in man." (2, p. 681). [They give man the "Higher Mind" (2, p.
614) and thus they work directly upon a human beings "brain."]
Bailey relates exactly how they
"benefit" humanity.
"As the Solar Gods descend ever
nearer to the physical plane, and their descent assume a steadily increasing
control of the lunar nature [lower mind], the thoughts and desires of men are
consequently purified and refined. . . . The Solar Angles blaze forth in all
their glory . . . " (2, p. 951).
[Note that Bailey often uses the
term "man" or "men" to mean mankind, male or female.] These
Fallen Angels yield the Ego (2, p. 617) and thereby "redeem
humanity" and "endow him with human affections and aspirations."
(2, footnote p. 951). Of course, the Fallen Angels, as Scripturally defined,
are demonic spirits that can only endow mankind with Scripturally defined evil.
Are the Fallen Angels related to
Sanat Kumara? Bailey claims that the Fallen Angles in the form of the greater
Builders are related to a specific Christian concept.
"From the Christian standpoint,
the greater Builders are the Holy spirit, . . . . " (2, p. 617).
From a Scriptural viewpoint, this
may be the most evil correspondence an individual can make, equating the Holy
Spirit with demonic spirit beings. But, as will be discussed in another
Internet paper, this exceptional evil correspondence is exactly what is being
done today within the "psychic" community. In her analogy to
electricity, Bailey states that "The greater Builders are the positive
aspects . . . . "(2, p. 612). Relative to the entities called The
Brothers of Light, Bailey states that "The Brothers of Light
co-operate with the positive aspect in, and of, all forms - the building devas
of evolutionary intent - in order to bring about the purposes of the Heavenly
Man . . . ." (2, p. 615). Thus, translating the code words, one has that
demonic spirit beings work for Sanat Kumara (Satan), and they perform Sanat
Kumara's mental overshadowing of mankind.
These and hundreds of other pieces
of direct evidence lead to only one conclusion. Bailey's theology is controlled
completely by all of the satanic concepts described within the Scriptures.
Bailey, along with all of the followers of this theology, have an immediate god
which is the Adversary. Bailey's telepathic control as well as the entities
that control the followers of this theology are demons. Bailey and all of the
followers of this theology may have committed the most grievous of Scriptural
sins. If they have actually used Holy Spirit procedures for their work, then they
have blasphemed the Holy Ghost. But, most certainly, they have used satanic
methods and controls for their work as well as claiming that Jesus Christ is a
demon controlled individual.
Although Bailey attempts to hid the
true identity of her "Christ," the identity is now rather obvious. In
the occult diagram of in Exhibit 4, as with all such diagrams, the
diagrammatically nearest non-Kumara entity to "S" (Sanat Kumara) is
always the most significant. Notice that this entity is "B," Bailey's
"Christ." If the three entities had equal weight, they should be
grouped along an arc of a circle. The Scriptures teach that the
"closest" entity to the Adversary and the entity that has not
formally appeared, yet, in its full earthly form is THE Antichrist of
Revelations. There is no doubt that the true identity of Bailey's
"Christ" is not as she has described him but, rather, he is the
Antichrist.
Many individuals who do not believe
that such spirit forms exist in objective reality would pass off Bailey's
claims as harmless if the secular aspects of her "theology" are
inconsistent with her supernatural concepts. Shortly, the material aspects of
Bailey's New World Order will be investigated and it will be determined
whether or not her secularized "theology" is truly harmless. Before
this investigation, let us see exactly how devious and how much a liar Alice A.
Bailey really was.
Now that certain, but not all,
Bailey code words have been identified, then, in order not to mar Bailey's
ingenious linguistic techniques, within the Bailey quotations these code words
or phrases are indicated only by the { . . . } notation. The actual Scriptural
meanings for these code words will then be given at the end of many of the long
quotations.
(Here too, what Alice Bailey says
about solar angels is filled with the falsehoods invented by Leadbeater.)
If Christians with their usual
amount of Scriptural knowledge were to first read this 1937 book, they might be
favorably impressed through the first hundred pages. Indeed, this is the very
first Bailey book I read since it is the only Bailey authored book in the U. S.
Naval Academy library and it is located in the section on "religion."
Fortunately, I began to observe certain Scriptural errors. Now this book, it is
claimed, was not dictated by Master D. K., but, we are told, Master D. K. does
endorse it completely.
Bailey utilizes every Scriptural and
extrabiblical reference she can in her attempt to show that Jesus of Nazareth,
the New testament Jesus, was not the only "Christ" manifested in the
flesh, "Son of God" or "Messenger" - a direct Scriptural
contradiction if all of the Scriptures are consulted. For example, she
writes on page 6,
"Yet St. Augustine tells us
that 'that which is called the Christian religion existed among the ancients,
and never did not exist from the beginning of the human race until {Christ}
came in the flesh, at which time the true religion, which already existed,
began to be called Christianity.' " {Master Jesus}
On page 8, Bailey writes,
"We know much of the exoteric
teaching. Orthodox and theological Christianity is founded on it, as are all
the orthodox formulations of the great religions."
Throughout this treatise, Bailey
continually uses the terms "Christ" and "God" and
"Jesus" as if they are, to her, one and the same entity. As shown
above, this is a deception on her part and a direct lie as to her true beliefs
since this book was written after she presented her true beliefs in her
other writings.
What Bailey attempts, and others
attempt even today, is to show that Jesus of Nazareth went through five great
episodes ("Birth, Baptism, Transfiguration, Crucifixion,
Resurrection") in order to become a Master and only much later does Bailey
call these episodes *initiations*. "Their significance for us and
their *re-interpretation* in modern terms is our task." (7, p. 15). This
quotation is our first strong clue as to Bailey's methods - methods used by
many cults that are present today - re-interpretation.
Bailey claims that "The
religion of Buddha, though preceding that of {Christ}, expresses the same basic
truths . . . ." (7, p. 19). {Master Jesus} Then some strange comments
begin to creep into her introduction.
"The story of {Christ's} birth
at Bethlehem can be paralleled in practically every detail in the lives of
earlier messengers from God." (7, p. 21). {Master Jesus}
We then discover exactly what Bailey
considers the "kingdom of God." She writes on page 45, "This
world is the kingdom of {God}." {Satan} Then on page 54, Bailey writes,
". . . and He had been preceded by other great {Sons of God}."
{Masters} Bailey continues along this same line attempting to show that Jesus
the Nazarene is simply an overshadowed disciple of Bailey's
"{Christ}" [the indwelling spirit being Satan, the Antichrist or
Master Jesus depending upon context] as was Buddha, Bailey claims. But, we now
come to the remarkable statement
". . . before the advent of
Christianity men recognized Him [Bailey's "Antichrist" concept
produced by Satanic overshadowing] as the beloved Krishna of the Hindu faith .
. . ." (7, p. 83).
Checking out a dictionary yields the
following: "Krishna. In Hindu mythology, the eighth son of Visnu" and
a picture of this idol god is shown (8, p. 1009, Sup. p. 65).
Further along in this treatise, we
find the interesting statement that "The majority of these great {Sons of
God} were curiously enough, born in a cave and usually of a virgin
mother." (7, p. 100). {Masters} "All of them 'descended into hell and
rose again on the third day'." (7, p. 102). Bailey claims that
"Zarathustra," Buddha, Krishna and other Sons of God behaved exactly
as {Jesus} did during their life times. {Master Jesus}
Bailey continues in a very
methodical rhetoric to prepare the way for yet more startling conclusions.
"{Christ} stands alone because
He was the greatest, the highest and truest that has ever appeared, but not
because - dare I say it? - He was the greatest that ever could appear. One dare
not so limit {God }." (7, p. 157). "{Christ} has given us the highest
and the most inclusive revelation . . . . But how shall we dare to say that no
more is possible to {God}, when we are ready to receive it?" (7, p. 158).
". . . *the {Christ} was one of the long line of manifesting {Sons of
God}*." (7, p. 332). ". . . Many men have died violent deaths. In
this, {Christ} was in no wise different from thousands of other far-seeing men
and reformers down the ages. In none of these respects was {Christ} really
unique." (7, p. 366). "History tells us many of these {Sons of God}
died and rose again, and finally ascended into Heaven." (7, p. 414).
"Purification of the self leads one up to the portal of initiation, and
then one can tread the Way, the Way that {Christ} trod from Bethlehem to
Calvary." (7, p. 482). {God = Satan} {Christ = Master Jesus} {Sons of God
= Masters}
One can immediately determine from
these last quotations that the Adversary controlled completely the mind of
Bailey. You might also recognize statements that Bailey has made that form a
portion of other so-called "Christian" doctrines. Indeed, this one
book has many contributions to make to this investigation, but rather than to
continue in this piecemeal manner, it seems much better to consider certain
categories separately. In so doing, we will often begin each category with
quotations taken from Bailey's From Bethlehem to Calvary even though it
was written after she developed and wrote down most of her basic doctrine.
What possible method could Bailey
apply in order to substantiate her conclusions? The method is the well-known
process of *re-interpretation of Scriptural concepts and dialectic argument*.
First, let us recall one of the major concepts within basic Christian doctrine
- The Kingdom of God - a concept that Bailey completely reverses.
"As depicted in the preaching
of Jesus, the kingdom of God may be characterized as being opposed to
everything present and earthly, to everything here and now. It is absolutely
miraculous . . . . Man can therefore, neither hasten the coming of the kingdom
of God by doing battle with God's enemies (as the Zealots hoped) nor force it
to appear by scrupulous observations of the law (as the Pharisees hoped). He
can only await its coming in patience and confidence . . . . This kingdom is
coming in the form of a cosmic catastrophe . . . . The facts that the kingdom
is the gift of God . . . . The kingdom of God is utterly transcendent and
supernatural: it comes from above, from God alone." (10, p. 385-386).
Now what does Bailey claim is the
kingdom of God?
"*This world is the kingdom of
{God}* . . ."( 7, p. 45). "It is time that the Church woke up to its
mission which is to materialise the kingdom of {God} on earth, today, here and
now." (7, p. 369). "People are no longer interested in a possible
heavenly state or probable hell. They need to learn that the *kingdom is here,
and must express itself on earth* . . . ." (7, p. 370). "But {Christ}
founded a kingdom on earth . . . ." (7, p. 501). "*We can produce,
and as a race give birth to, the next kingdom in nature, which {Christ} called
the kingdom of {God}* . . . ." (7, p. 454). ". . . the question,
however, arises whether we may hasten the process . . . so expedite matters
that the kingdom and its laws may hold sway earlier than would otherwise be the
case." (7, p. 483). "However, it is possible to hasten the coming of
the kingdom . . . ." (7, p. 485). "*The true Church is the kingdom of
{God} on earth* . . . ." (7, p. 487). "How will this condition of
{God's} kingdom materialise on earth?" (7, p. 489). ". . . {Christ}
certainly opened the door into the kingdom, *the rest of the work rests upon
our shoulders*; . . ." (7, p. 491). "*{He} came to found the kingdom
of {God } on earth* . . . ." (7, p. 505). "The kingdom is now
organised on earth . . .." (7, p. 505). {God = Satan} {Christ, He = Master
Jesus}
Is this kingdom of God on earth
simply a momentary aberration or has it become a continuing theme? In 1946,
Bailey takes the following dictation from her control Master D. K.
". . . the long-awaited
*kingdom of {God} is simply the appearance of soul-{controlled} men on earth in
everyday life and at all stages of that {control}*." (6, p. 588). ".
. . when the facts of the presence on earth . . . of the Kingdom of {God} will
be accepted: . . . ." (6, p. 589). ". . . the eternal existence of
the kingdom of {God} on earth is established." (6, p. 561). [In 1947, we
have] ". . . to make public the already existent Kingdom of {God}."
(6, p. 661). {God = Satan} {control = demon control}
In Oct. 1982, the Lucis Trust
supplied (free of charge) this investigator with a long list of pamphlets and
booklets. What do these say about this kingdom of God on earth?
"The bringing of the kingdom of
{God}, the preparation for the coming {Christ} and salvaging of mankind . . .
." (SH, p. 8). "The {Christ} stands in patient silence, attentive to
the effort that will make {His} work materialise on Earth . . ." (ROC, p.
3). "Let us forget distance, remoteness and vagueness and realize that we
are talking of *exact and literal happenings on our planet*." (ROC, p.
12). ". . . and finally the self-evident truth that *only through humanity
itself can the divine {Plan} work out*." (TMW, p. 10). "It then sums
it all up in the clarion words: 'Let Light and Love and Power restore the Plan
on Earth.' Always the emphasis is laid upon the place of appearance and of
manifestation: the earth." (GI, p. 14). {God = Satan} {Christ, His = Antichrist}
{Plan = Satanic Plan}
And the same ideas are repeated over
and over again. Before continuing the methodology of Bailey, it might be better
at this moment to discover additional information about the Bailey meanings for
the terms love and evil. Recall that the Fallen Angles have a
nature of Knowledge and Love. This in itself is a significant characterization
for the term "love." Any additional information will aid us greatly
as we continue to discuss the "Plan" and the other concepts that
Bailey employs. We will return shortly to other Scriptural re-interpretations
and Bailey's use of dialectic argument.
Throughout most of Bailey's writings
the term "love" is in continual use. One consistent meaning for
Bailey's "love" concept is that is manifests itself in "service
to humanity." Are these Bailey concepts consistent with our previous code
word identifications?
With respect to service,
Bailey emphases the New Group of World Servers. This group is the major
element of the "Plan." Often the terms used to describe the service
this group will "lovingly" supply are general rather than specific in
character. It seems that all individuals will be placed into two categories.
Those who will not be members of this elite group of World Servers are,
". . . those people who,
clinging to *reactionary methods of finding and expressing truth, prefer
obedience to authority* to clear thinking and self-imposed guidance of their
own {soul}." {demon controlled soul}
You can easily determine from what
follows in this investigation that the term *"reactionary" refers to
all of the methods and processes used within, at the least, fundamental
Judeo-Christine doctrine*. The "authority" accepted by individuals
who will not be members of the New Group of World Servers is the
authority of religious doctrine such as the Bible.
Then we have those who will populate
this new, never before, existing group.
". . . those who, while
affirming the fundamental {truths} by which humanity has evolved, are
*sensitive to {soul} impression*, and recognise that response to human need and
spiritual {unfoldment} are determining factors which lead humanity into a new
age of peace and plenty." (NGWS, p. 3). {truths = Satanic truths} {soul =
demonic} {unfoldment = demonic unfoldment}
Remember that Bailey's *initiation
process, where an ordinary human being can become a Master or even a godlike
spirit being* much like Sanat Kumara, is modeled on the physical theory of
evolution. Note the not yet identified terms peace and plenty.
But what does Bailey's control consider as "peace"? The world servers
must ". . . *repudiate violently the unproven*." (NGWS, p. 3). The
term violently, as will be seen, means very violently and the
term unproven refers to anything that might be accepted on faith such as
a supernatural kingdom of God. Indeed, the "plenty" will only go to
the New Group of World Servers and "peace" will be maintained by the
most violent of means. Members of this group must also have goodwill and
foster right human relations. The concept of what are "right human
relations" is not directly but only indirectly defined within Bailey's
writings. As it will be demonstrated, such relations are those that are to be
dictated by the Antichrist. This fact is shown by what is considered the most
important characteristic for the leaders of the New Group of World Servers.
"They can be regarded as the
embodiment of the emerging kingdom of {God} on earth, but it should be
remembered that *this kingdom is not a Christian kingdom* . . . ." (NGWS,
p.5). {Satan}
Additional characteristics for
members of the New Group of World Servers can be found in the Lucis Trust
booklet with this title. There are different subgroups within this group.
First, we seem to have a description for the leaders.
". . . they *embrace all
religions, all science and all philosophy*. Their characteristics are
synthesis, *inclusiveness*, intellectuality, and fine mental development . . .
. They *recognise no authority save that of their own {souls}*." (NGWS, p.
7). {demon controlled souls}
Note the code word inclusiveness.
This means that they all follow, in complete subservience, the dictates of the
Antichrist. Indeed, they probably have no choice in the matter. Now the next in
line of service use the methods of secular mind control. They
". . . are the intellectual,
highly educated men and women . . . . They utilize all the known methods to
reach the general public. They *stir the middle class to activity and, through
them, arouse the masses*." (NGW, p. 6).
These methods and, indeed, the very
wording of this quotation should be very familiar to you.
As pointed out above, one of the
most important terms used within these Bailey descriptions is the term
"inclusiveness." Inclusiveness is the absolute of Bailey's
"right human relations" and characterizes her concept of
"love." ". . . a spirit of love (which is a spirit of
inclusiveness . . . .)" (7, p. 469). The antithesis to this concept is
represented by the term separateness. This *concept of separativenss is,
to Bailey, the highest of all of the evils*. Bailey has a great deal to say as
to what is not to be considered as evil today. In fact, as certain
quotations will indicate, the "evils" described in Judeo-Christian
doctrine are no longer evil within Bailey's New Age ethics.
"Our interpretation of sin and
its penalty has been at fault . . . ." (7, p. 343). "Christianity has
produced such sad, weary, and sin-conscious men." (7, p. 345).
"Theology over-reached itself with its 'miserable sinner' complex and its
emphasis upon the necessity for purification by blood." (7, p. 336).
"But we have been so preoccupied with the subject of sin that we have
forgotten *our divinity*; . . . " (7, p. 330). "The question of evil
is too large to elucidate at length, but it might be defined simply as
adherence to *that which we should have outgrown, the grasping of that which we
should have left behind*." (7, p. 354).
Thus, to Bailey, *there are no
longer any absolutes relative to sin*. Hence, *no basic behavior requirements
as stated in Judeo-Christian and other religious doctrine*. This idea is
prevalent today [1997] with many so-called Christian groups; "we have
evolved and we should have outgrown these sin concepts." Indeed, sin is
now whatever her New Group of World Servers declare and should no longer be
guided by the Scriptures.
As to the concept of
"separation," Bailey writes:
"When we are *separative in our
attitudes* or *do anything which produces separation*, we are transgressing a
fundamental law of {God}." (7, p. 355). "It is the sense of
separateness, this emphasis upon *personal and individual good, which is the
nature of sin*." (7, p. 356). "Separateness is hatred, aloneness and
division." (7, p. 356). {God = Satan}
One might wonder how an emphasis
upon personal and individual good could ever be considered as sin? This is
directly counter to the Declaration of Independence of the United States is it
not? Indeed, in order to entice many to accept her theology, many statements
that appear in the free booklets contradict this specific meaning for Bailey's
term "separateness."
(*)The "freedoms" we have
of association is termed as "separateness" by Bailey's demon control.
Any personal "rights" that might separate one from the control of
Bailey's god and anything that would alter an individual's complete unwavering
allegiance to Bailey's god is separateness.(*)
We now have the basic meaning for
Bailey's code word "separateness" and when this code word is used you
should refer back to this basic meaning.
Shortly, using Bailey's own words,
we will discover what Bailey considers the *worst form of separateness - the
following of fundamental Judeo-Christian doctrine*. But, first it seems that
Bailey's control may have had some difficulty in defining the term
"love;" a term she uses thousands of time.
"The expression of divine love
is still in the making; the world is not yet full of love and few there are who
understand the true meaning of the word. But - speaking symbolically - when the
United Nations has emerged into factual and actual power, the welfare of the
world will then be assured. What is that welfare but love in action?"
(ROC, p. 9).
The United Nations plays an very
important role in Master D. K.'s plan for it is from this or similar platforms
that the satanic "Plan" is to be presented and controlled.
It is by examining Bailey's concept
of evil that the true meanings of such terms as love, goodwill, service and
right human relations are ascertained. In 1937, Bailey made a comment about the
coming conflict in Europe. You will notice that her control considers this conflict
a "right and good" thing.
"The disintegration in the
world at this time is right and good, provided we understand why it is taking
place and by what it should be succeeded. *Destruction, that is carried on with
a view to eventual construction is right and proper . . . some ideas must exist
as to subsequent reconstruction.*" (7, p. 463).
Master D. K. even calls this *destruction-construction*
concept *The Principle of Conflict* and the results produce *The Ray
of Harmony through Conflict*. (1, p. 623).
What I am about to relate may be
difficult to believe and even more difficult to read. As is well-known,
probably the greatest event in modern Bible prophesy since 70 A. D. is the
official return of the Jews to Palestine in May 1948. There is no doubt that
this one event would be highly repugnant to Bailey's controlling force since it
would clearly indicate the beginning of its end. On the other hand, if
individuals doubt the existence of such supernatural forces, then I feel they
would be hard pressed to account for what I am about to relate. What appears
next is, from Bailey's viewpoint, one of the most evil examples of
"separateness" that has ever occurred.
Bailey wrote many of these
quotations in 1948. (1, p. 620). Research indicates that other portions were
written, at the least, during the period from March 1946 - March 1949.
"The Poles and the Irish are
prime 'catalysts of conflict' and are constantly instigating difficulties
between peoples. . . . *Today the Jewish people are engineering trouble*, and
it is interesting to note that the main contention in the past of Poland,
lately of the Irish, and today of the Jews, is territory, thus
evidencing a most distorted sense of values. . . . They [the Jews] were also,
during the years immediately following the war [World War II], under the
control of a glamour imposed by the Zionist Dictators, who were attempting
(somewhat unsuccessfully) to be to the Jewish people what Stalin and his group,
and Hitler and his gang, have been to their people. . . . They worked through
the same methods - terrorising, withholding information, browbeating their
opponents, making false claims and bribing and corrupting. . . . They are
claiming a land to which they have no possible right . . . . *The Jew has ever
been (could he but usefully remember it) the symbol of humanity - evolving,
seeking, restless, materialistic, *separative* and greedy*." (1, p.
634-635)
As to The Holocaust, Bailey's demon
control down plays the significance of this most evil of events.
"The Jewish people . . . ; they
forget that millions in the world today have suffered as they have suffered and
that - for instance - there are eighty per cent of other people in the
concentration camps of Europe and only twenty per cent Jews. . . . I have
enlarged thus upon the Jewish conflict because it is the symbol of all past
conflicts in human history, based upon universal selfishness and the greed of
undeveloped humanity, . . ." (1, p. 635). "Now they [the United
Nations] have made another [mistake]. . . . for it is the American Jews who
have created the situation, with relatively little help or endorsement from
Jews of other nations. The United States . . . have thrown the weight of their
influence into the conflict on the side of aggression and of territorial theft.
They could have worked for the Principle of Harmony and permitted time and the
non-*separativeness* of the nations to adjust and solve the Jewish
problem." (1, p. 636).
In the next quotations, you will
discover that Bailey's control *approves of the teachings of Marx and Lenin but
not how their teachings have been implemented* in Russia. This proves that
Sanat Kumara is not all knowing since in 1981 it was irrefutably demonstrated
that combining Marxism with any supernatural philosophy, including Bailey's,
would yield a highly overtly inconsistent, contradictory and dangerous
philosophy that would be overthrown (11). [Indeed, as is well-know, this 1982
prediction has occurred.] Also we have the introduction of two new code phases
- *the Great White Lodge that aids in the externalization of Bailey's
theology and the Black Lodge that attempts to externalize the precepts
of the Judeo-Christian and similar doctrine*.
"The major battle in the word
today is that of the freedom of the average citizen to think for himself and to
come to his own decisions and conclusions. [This is logically inconsistent with
other Bailey statements relative to separateness and appears to be used only as
a deceitful appeal to human pride.] It is here that the major quarrel between
the {Great White Lodge} and the {Black Lodge} is to be found. It is a battle in
which humanity itself is the decisive factor, and for this reason the {Black
Lodge} is working through the group which is controlling the destiny of Russia
and also through the Zionist movement. The leaders of the U. S. S. R. are
working intelligently and potently against human freedom and particularly
against freedom of thought. Communism per se has no such objective; . .
.Zionism today stands for aggression and for the use of force, and the keynote
is permission to take what you want irrespective of other people or their
inalienable rights." (1, p. 679-680).
Of course, as demonstrated, it is
*Bailey's god that actually wants to take these rights away from the
individual*.
"The true communistic platform
is sound; it is brotherhood in action and it does not - in its original
platform - run counter to the spirit of the {Christ}." (1, p. 680).
{Antichrist}
Bailey then says that people have
interpreted the writings of Marx and Lenin incorrectly for their own gain and
this is
"just as the *theologians of
the Church interpret the words of Christ [Jesus], which has no relation to
{His} original intention*." (1, p. 680). "The leaders of the Zionist
movement of aggression constitute a real danger to world peace and human
development and their activities have been endorsed by the expediency policy of
the U. S. A. . . . It is the Zionists who have defied the United Nations,
lowered its prestige and made its position both negative and negligible to the
world. . . . These activities [returning to a homeland in Palestine] run
counter to all the plans of the spiritual Hierarchy and mark a point of triumph
of the forces of evil." (1, p. 681). {Master Jesus}
As it is slowly being demonstrated,
*that which the Bible considers as "good" and "proper"
Bailey's control considers as evil, and that which Bailey's control considers
as "good" and "proper" the Bible considers as evil*. In
fact, to Bailey's control Master D. K., the evil presented by the Jews return
to the Holy Land, or what is called "isolated separativeness" is the
supreme portion of the ultimate evil - cosmic evil.
"The true nature of cosmic evil
finds its major expression in wrong thinking [not that of Satan], false values
[not the values as stated in the Scriptures] and the supreme evil of
materialistic selfishness and the sense of isolated *separativeness*." (1,
p. 753)
Master D. K. introduces the code
phrase *seal the door where Evil Dwells*. *The sealing is to be
done violently.* This demon not only advocates that the *door be closed
on the Jews*, but begins to allude to the same *cosmic evil as being present in
the Christian Church*. What is most certain, however, is that Satan, as stated
through Master D. K. and all other members of the Hierarchy, hated Judaism prior
to May 1948. In the section entitled The Hidden Source of the Outer Turmoil
(January 1939) of the book The Externalisation of the Hierarchy the
Jews are again attacked.
". . . you can come to an
understanding of the Jew, his *separateness*, his desire for racial purity and
his interest in that which is commercial and tangible. The Jew, down the ages,
has insisted upon being *separated* from all other races but he brought over
from the previous system the knowledge (necessary then but obsolete now) that
his race was the 'chosen people.' " (6, p. 77).
Notice that the *knowledge presented
in the Old Testament is now, according to Bailey, "obsolete."* The
conservative Christian Church takes on the characteristics of the Black Lodge,
in Bailey's view. With respect to the New World Religion, we have the
following remarks.
"1. The reorganization of the
world religions - if in any way possible - so that *their out-of-date
theologies, their narrow-minded emphasis and their ridiculous belief that they
know what is in the Mind of God* may be offset, in order that the churches may
eventually be the recipients of spiritual inspiration. 2. *The gradual
dissolution - again if in any way possible - of the orthodox Jewish faith, with
its obsolete teaching*, its *separative* emphasis, its hatred of the Gentiles
and its failure to recognize the {Christ}." (6, p. 544). "That the
*Vatican cease its political scheming, its exploitation of the masses and its
emphasis upon ignorance* is as important; that the manifold *divisions of the
Protestant churches be bridged* is imperative." (6, p. 545). {Master
Jesus}
I point out that it will soon be
demonstrated that the phrase Bailey uses "in any way possible" means
by every possible and violent means. Of course, we also have major discussions
as to the "Plan" that, when coupled with the above quotations,
indicates what Christianity is not considered to be. "The
establishing, by all means available, of right human relations."
(6, p. 546).
In 1946 and as part of the
"Plan," Master D. K. continues through Bailey to state, when the New
World Religion is discussed, why the Jews should be eliminated.
"2. The Gradual Dissolution of
Orthodox Judaism. Reason. a. Because of its presentation of a wrathful
Jehovah, *caring only for his chosen people. This is a basic evil.* The Lord of
the World, the {God} in whom we live and move and have our being is totally
otherwise. b. Because of its *separateness*. c. Because it is so ancient that
its teachings are largely obsolete." (6, p. 551). {Satan}
Bailey's demons continue to escalate
their attacks upon the Christian Churches that do not accept Bailey's form of
non-Christian ecumenicalism. First, we have the emphasis on separateness.
"Basic cleavages and
*separateness* unrecognised 500 years ago is now recognised as harmful, and
remedies are sought." (SH, p. 6). "The spiritual awakening of men
everywhere (within or without the worlds faiths, and largely outside of them) .
. . ." (ROC, p. 5).
Further, we have Bailey's description
of the New World Religion,
"The Reorganisation of the
World Religions. Reasons. a. *To make way for the World Religion,
universal religion*. c. To *rid the world of theology and
ecclesiasticism*." (6, p. 551). "Because having a religious basis
[the next world war], the hate involved would be far greater than anything
hitherto known." (6, p. 552). "This second group [of World Servers]
will implement this new religion; by the time they come into control the old
theological activities will have been completely broken; Judaism will be fast
disappearing; Buddhism will be spreading and becoming increasing dogmatic; Christianity
will be in a state of chaotic division and upheavals." (6, p. 573).
". . . *offset the scheming of reactionary and conservative politicians
and churchmen*, and teach the young of the age the *new modes of living
indicating to them the better values* . . . ." (6, p. 576)
Notice the use of the term
"conservative." Further, these so-called "better values"
are not those found in a conservative interpretation of the Scriptures.
Master D. K. continues with his
denouncements.
". . . this same orthodox
Christian will find it increasingly difficult to induce the intelligent masses
of people to accept the *impossible Deity and feeble Christ [Jesus] which
historical Christianity has endorsed*." (6, p. 590). ". . . these
people will *not tolerate authoritarianism in any Church* [such as the
authority of the Bible] . . . (6, p. 618). ". . . *defeat of all that
which infringes human free will [this contradicts other statements and means
Satanic controlled will] and which keeps humanity in ignorance; it applies
equally to any established system - Catholic or Protestant -* . . . ." (6,
p. 701). [Notice how these statements attempt to take advantage of many human
weaknesses.]
Let me now close this section with
two quotations that characterizes absolutely Bailey's basic evil. I note
that another code word for her theology is *Christ consciousness*. Of
course, her "Christ" is the Antichrist and this means *overshadowing
for the purpose of embedding Satanic concepts*. In the next quotation, more of
what Bailey considers to be absolute evil is identified; equating her
"Christ" with the Scriptural Jesus Christ.
"Why this triumph of the
{Christ consciousness} must always be spoken of in terms of religion of
church-going or orthodox belief is one of the incredible triumphs of the forces
of evil." (ROC, p. 11)
This continues the theme that her
"Christ" is not the same as the Christ concept of Judeo-Christian
doctrine. But, how is her demon control going to control the forces of
"evil," and exactly who or what are they? What is the material Power
that Sanat Kumara is going to evoke? He tells us that
"The atomic bomb emerged from
the first ray Ashram, working in conjunction with a fifth ray group
[scientists] . . . its intent was and is purely beneficent. As a means in the
hands of the United Nations to enforce the outer forms of peace and on the
growth of goodwill to take effect . . . . It belongs to the United Nations for
use (or let us rather hope, simply for threatened use), when aggressive action
on the part of any nation rears its ugly head. It does not essentially matter .
. . whether it is generated by political groups of any powerful religious
organisation such as the Church of Rome . . . ." (6, p. 548).
These statements are so immediately
clear that they need little further illumination. I suppose that if atomic
weapons are not available, then other such *violent means will be employed*. It
is not necessary that one assume that this specific means will be the
"Power" used only that violent means of one sort or another will be
utilized. Of great importance to Bailey's control is the use of violent means
for purification, purification which her control describes.
"Shamballa Force 1. The Energy
of Purification. . . .It involves the elimination of all that hinders the
nature of divinity from full expression. [This is the Antichrist concepts being
displayed by humanity.] 2. The Energy of Destruction. This is a destruction
which removes or changes the forms which imprison the inner spiritual life and
hide the inner {soul} {light}." (Sham.). {soul = demon controlled soul}
{light = Luciferian enlightenment}
I feel that no additional quotations
with respect to Bailey's wish to destroy certain church organizations is
necessary. *Being a Jew or being a member of any "church" body
different from her New World Religion, or not following in any fashion Bailey's
teachings adds additional content to the code word separateness.* The
first article that appears in the July-August (1982) issue of the
"Beacon" journal (founded by Bailey in 1922) is entitled, The
Greatest Heresy. "The Ageless Wisdom teaching informs us, in no
uncertain terms, that *separation* is the greatest heresy, or evil, from which
the most serious world problems spring."
*Bailey takes advantage of many
human weaknesses.* In fact, it is explicitly stated that the controlling demons
of the New World Order will take advantage of these human weaknesses.
"The gullibility of the average
citizen, his willingness to accept what is told him if it is said loudly enough
and with sufficient force is well-known. Mass psychology and mob determination
have been exploited down the age . . . . But this negative receptivity can be
easily turned to good ends as bad." (SH, p. 8).
Of course, this contradicts the
Scriptures in many places such as Rom. 3:5 - 8. Then we have that within the
New World Religion "pagan" festivals play an important role. Of
course, this is justified since some of today's so-called Christian festivals
were originally pagan in character.
". . . new world religion
emphasising the three major spiritual festivals at the time of Aries, Taurus
and Gemini full moon periods and nine lesser festivals." (TMW, p. 11).
"The Wesek Festival is the festival of the Buddha and is held each year at
the time of the full moon of May or more correctly the full moon in the sign of
Taurus." (ROC, p. 7).
We now come to the greatest dangers
of all. Many, many cults and so-called Christian sects completely contradict
the Scriptures as to the sinful nature of humankind. Many such organizations
also *use forms of initiation that they claim will eventually lead humankind
into godlike states*. Bailey's demon control *takes complete advantage of the
"prideful" nature of mankind and exploits it absolutely*.
"We are human beings, but we
are also divine." (7, p. 482). "*If there is really a God-man, there
is also a Man-god*, . . . ." (7, p. 482). ". . . *man is
divine*." (7, p. 459).
Bailey concentrates upon the assumed
sinless (in her sense of sin, I suppose) godlike qualities of all human beings
throughout every piece of her writings. Repeatedly she dismisses the
Scripturally described sin concept and states that "*you will be like God*"
exactly as stated by the serpent in Gen 3:5 (NIV). Moreover, *group meditation
and absolute mind control will be fostered*. All of this is outlined in the
booklets entitled Meditation at the Full Moon, The Science of
Meditation, and Techniques of Goodwill handbook pages 31 - 35. These
booklets appear on the 1982 literature selection received from the Lucis Trust
and may be obtained free-of-charge from their various offices. I should also
mention one other important aspect of the New World Order - The New
Astrology. But, I need not give any details of this aspect since it
actually contains nothing new.
Is it possible that after knowing
all of these facts that there remains one more great danger for the Christian?
The greatest danger for a Christian has not as yet been fully discussed. I
firmly believe that many, many, *Christians can easily be entrapped by Bailey's
theology due to their lack of Scriptural knowledge* and, hence, their *extreme
misunderstanding of such Bailey terms as the "Christ" and by her
clever re-interpretation of Scriptural concepts*. A vast number of individuals
have the impression that Bailey's Christ is Jesus Christ. As an example, in
reference 3 on page 54, one can find a brief biography of Alice A. Bailey. The
writer of this biography leads one to believe that Bailey's Christ is, indeed,
Jesus Christ. He writes, ". . . the figure Christ continued to play a
central part of her beliefs." As this analysis has irrefutably
demonstrated, this last statement implies a false conclusion, since *Bailey's
Christ in "dense physical plane form" is NOT Christ Jesus as He is
known throughout the orthodox Christian community, but is rather the
Antichrist*.
Thus far, many examples of the
ingenious ways Bailey has re-interpreted Scriptural concepts and used dialectic
argument have been presented, but a few more examples will definitely be
beneficial. With regard to the return of Jesus Christ, where the Scriptures
state the exact manner He [the glorified Jesus] will return, Bailey writes,
"The symbolic prophecies found
in all the world scriptures anent this imminent event will prove their
veracity; their symbolism will nevertheless elicit re-interpretation;
circumstances and happenings will not necessarily be exactly as the Scriptures
would appear to indicate." (ROC, p.7). "He will come indeed in the
'clouds of the air' . . . means little to our modern civilisation." (ROC,
p. 7). "*He does not come as the omnipotent God of man's ignorant
creation*, but as the *{Christ} the founder of the Kingdom of {God} on Earth* .
. . ."(ROC, p. 12). "The generally accepted idea that He will return
as a triumphant warrior, omnipotent and irresistible has surely no basis in
fact." (ROC, p. 13). "That the circumstances of {His} return are only
symbolically related to the world scriptures; this may produce a vital change
in perceived ideas of humanity." (ROC, p. 14). "All this will not
come as the result of some proclamation or some stupendous planetary event
which will force human beings everywhere to say : 'Lo: He is there! Lo: Here
are the signs of His divinity!' for that would evoke only antagonism and
laughter, resistance or fanatical credulity." (ROC, p. 8). {God = Satan}
{Christ, His = Antichrist}
Master D. K. tells us the actual
plans for Bailey's "Christ" to return will not
". . . produce the wild claims
and the credulous recognition of the well-meaning and the *unintelligent* as is
so frequently the case today [~1948] nor will someone appear and say 'This is
the Christ. He is here or He is there.' " (ROC, p. 9).
After Bailey's "Christ"
establishes "goodwill" and "right" human relations [the
Scripturally defined evil concept] on earth, Master D. K. tells us,
"Then {His} task will be done:
{He} will be free again to leave us, this time not to return, but to leave the
world of men in the hands of the great spiritual {Server Who} will be the new
{Head} of the Hierarchy, the {Church Invisible}. (6, P. 604). {I am sure you
can now translate such code words. However, note that at various places within
Bailey's writings the words revert to their original meanings.}
Why must Bailey's "Christ"
leave? This is simply because Bailey claims that no supernatural heaven exists.
"It requires . . . a cessation
of the constant presentation of a beautiful future in a mythical heaven . . .
." (SH, p. 8). "That Kingdom exists but it is not a place of
disciples or golden harps *peopled by unintelligent fanatics* . . . ."
(ROC, p. 10). [Notice how Bailey characterizes many conservative Christians.]
Bailey explains exactly why the human
race is now receiving these "new" truths. Because
"{His} earlier message has been
negated, forgotten or misinterpreted for two thousand years . . . ." (ROC,
p. 13). [The Christian Church has produced a] ". . . distortion of {His}
teachings . . . ." (ROC, p. 9). [For the church] ". . . has made it
appear that He [Jesus] and He only and no one else could possibly do the same
works." (ROC, p. 9). "These groups . . . have so distorted the
teachings by dogmatic assertions on unimportant details and by ridiculous
claims that they have evoked little recognition of the underlying truth, nor
have they portrayed a {kingdom} which is attractive." (ROC, p. 10).
{kingdom = earth} [Even Paul appears to be at fault, according to Master D.
K.,] "The words {He} spoke were few and simple and all men can understand
them, but their significance has been largely lost in the intricate legalities
and discussions of St. Paul, and in lengthy disputations of theological
commentators since {Christ} lived . . . ." (ROC, p. 2). {Christ, His, He =
Master Jesus}
Bailey claims that if a Christian
wishes to determine the attributes of the returning Christ, then the Scriptures
must not be relied upon.
"If men look for the Christ
[Jesus] who left His disciples centuries ego, they will fail to recognise the
{Christ} {Who} is in the process of returning. "(ROC, p. 16). "*The
{Christ} {Who} will return will not be like the Christ Who (apparently)
departed.*" (ROC, p. 15). [Moreover,] "{He} comes *to correct the
mistakes and the misrepresentations of those who have dared to interpret His
simple words in terms of their own ignorance, and to recognise those whose
faithful service has made {His} return possible*." (ROC, p. 13). "He
will gather around {Him}, in the flesh, {His} chosen associates and advisers;
these will not be the ones who gathered around in those earlier simpler days
but those members of our human family who today recognise {Him} and are
preparing to work with {Him} as far as in them lies." (ROC, p. 13).
According to Bailey, one need not
have any particular Scripturally directed beliefs.
"*The {Christ} has no religious
barriers in {His} consciousness. It matters not to {Him} of what faith a man
may call himself.*" (Roc, p. 16). [Indeed, we are told that] "There
is a growing and developing belief that {Christ} is in us, as {He} was
in Master Jesus." (ROC,p. 2). [You can believe in reincarnation and the
like and still remain an important part of Bailey's Kingdom of God on Earth for
the Buddha and Christ are considered by Bailey to represent the same divine
entity.] ". . . the Buddha and the {Christ} will together pass before the
{Father}, the Lord of the World. . . ." (ROC, p.4). [Christ is] ". .
. the same great Identity in all the world religions." (TMW, p. 3). {Father
= Satan in this context.}
I close this section with the exact
description of how the Masters, Bailey's "Christ" and other members
of Bailey's Hierarchy will appear in their demon controlled dense physical
plane manifestations as well as the exact sequence that Bailey claims will deliver
the "Christ" to this world.
1. *None of these dense physical
plane individuals will differ physically from the ordinary members of the human
race.*
2. [The probable method that
Bailey's spirit entities will utilize.] ". . . the most probable method
will be through overshadowing of some men, or some group of men, so that they
will be inspired to bring about the victory of liberty." [Men = male or
female] (6, p. 268).
3. [With respect to the actual
appearance of Bailey's "Christ," we have] ". . . that this
{Rider} on the white horse is no extra-planetary Entity or Life, but
essentially {One} like unto ourselves - human and animal combined as are we
all, but fused with divinity and inspired from on high, informed by the same
cosmic and divine Principle . . . . The {Rider} is one of our humanity {Who}
has reached a pre-destined goal and {Who} - for very {love} and understanding
of man - has remained for ages in the secret place of revelation . . . waiting
until {His} hour comes around again and {He} can then issue forth to lead {His}
people to triumphant victory." (6, p. 269). "The Christian concept of
the return of a triumphant Christ, coming in the clouds of heaven to Jerusalem,
there to reign for a thousand years, is true in one way and utterly false as to
design, location and method . . . . {His} coming in the air might be
interpreted literally to mean that at the right time {He} will come by plane
from a place on earth where {He} has been for many generations, watching over
the sons of men; the words 'every eye shall see Him' might mean that, by the
time {He} comes television [and the Internet] will have been perfected and {He}
will then be seen, by its means, from even the most distant spot on earth. To
the orthodox Christian, the above will sound like the rankest blasphemy, but
the question immediately arises: Why should it be blasphemy for {Him} to use
modern methods? . . . *A great deal of reactionary stupidity will have to be
eliminated [violently if necessary] before {He} can come, and it will be as
the new generation assert their hold over human thinking.* (6, p. 575-576).
{Italics added}
The "Plan" is rather
obvious from all that has preceded this section and will not be further
analyzed to any great degree. In general, however, the Plan means a one-world
that is totally unified in all things and this unity is to be obtained
completely by human endeavor that is inspired by members of the Hierarchy. Of
course, this means complete unity with respect to the ideals of the
Scripturally described Satan. In addition, this unity will be maintained by
demon control. One of the code words for this Plan is The New World Order.
Many preparatory steps are needed in order to establish this demonic New World
Order.
"In the preparatory period for
the New World Order there will be a *steady and regulated disarmament*. It will
not be optional." (6, p. 191).
This is required so that Bailey's
United Nations or a *similar organization can utilize the Power of
Destruction to control the religious "fanatics," among others*.
Today [1997], this is actually what is taking place within the United States.
The United States is disarming while other nations and organizations in the
Middle and Far-East are retaining, stockpiling or continuing to seek the
ultimate weapons. Also we have The New World Education and The New
International Economic Order that will *redistribute all of the
worlds economic resources*. Bailey lists the terminology that The New Group of
World Servers (her human disciples) should utilize. Such terms as Right
Understanding, Union, United, Human Welfare and especially World
Goodwill. Notice that Bailey capitalizes the first letter in order to
differentiate these terms from the usual ones with their different basic
meanings. Indeed, any terminology, with the first letter a capital, that
signifies complete unwavering unity in thought or in deed is to be a code word
for this movement.
*Many of the terms signifying
worldwide efforts to aid individuals and even countries would be consistent
with Christian goals and for this very reason many Christians have joined the
ranks of the organizations that are covertly implementing Bailey's goals.* Many
such organizations employ overshadowing techniques, *types of meditation* and
*"Invocations"* similar to the "Great Invocation." These
techniques are to serve the purpose of eventual demon control.
The safest way to avoid any such
demon controlled individuals or organizations is to reject all statements made
by any individual or organization that do not follow explicitly the strict word
of God as stated in the Scriptures. Then, due to the ingenious methods often
used, one also needs to obtain, exactly as stated within the Scriptures, the
indwelling of the Holy Ghost. Then one needs to apply true Holy Ghost
verification in order to determine the exact spiritual intent of any such
individual or organization.
As far as the Great Invocation and
other similar invocations is concerned, obviously the Lucis Trust and other
such organizations *wish to deceive the general public as to the true meaning
of this and similar "mantras."* We are told that this "prayer"
is to replace the Lords Prayer and will thereby become the The New World
Prayer.(GI, p. 8) (TMW, p. 7).
"First, the general public will
regard it as a prayer to God Transcendent . . . . They will regard it finally
as a prayer that some equally vague primeval condition of blissful happiness
may be restored . . . . This is, for them, entirely good and helpful . . .
." (GI, p. 8).
Then, depending upon your
"spiritual intelligence," the "Prayer" gathers more and
more meaning. Nevertheless, we are strongly reminded that when it is employed
an individual ". . . allies himself with the spiritual Hierarchy."
(GI, p. 11). Moreover, we are told that ". . . not a day does by that the
{Christ Himself} does not sound it forth." (GI, p. 9).
As to new code phrases that appear
in this invocation, I draw your attention to the center where the Will of
God is known. This center is Shamballa, among other names. Bailey's
original definition for this term is The City of the Gods . . . . It is a
sacred island in the Gobi Desert. (6, p. 255). This term, however, has
reverted to its original meaning in Vedic mythology but has retained this
spelling. The term in Vedic mythology is spelled "Skambha" or
"Stambha" and refers to the entire frame or supporting structure
of Bailey's planetary Hierarchy, including the inner relations between the
Hierarchy and humanity. [This term is therefore similar in meaning to the
Scriptural term "hypostasis." The Scriptural understanding of this
term is that it means all of the real but hidden or underlying attributes or
assumptions that control and yield all of the outward direct or indirect
manifestations that characterize a material or immaterial thing. These
attributes tend to be greater than any natural manifestation of their presence
(the reality behind appearances).] The changing of the spelling was apparently
required so that Bailey could use a small and insignificant amount of occult
numerology.
In trivial modular 9 arithmetic,
Shamballa is represented by the number 6, the number that Bailey defines as a
representation of "perfection." Then she re-interprets 666 to
simply mean the basic materialism of the ordinary human being. As an individual
moves along in their initiation, they drop the first digit 6 and can be
represented by the number 66. Finally, at the end of their initiation, they can
then employ the number 6. (1, p. 79-80). Elsewhere, we are told that one of the
Heavenly Men is associated with the number 666, while our Heavenly Man (Sanat
Kumara) Bailey claims is associated with the number 777. However, none of this
numerology is developed to any extent in any of the references used in this
analysis.
Further code words that appear in
the Great Invocation are now easily translated. The term Light means *occult
illumination or enlightenment*. This refers to actual or real information
obtained from another natural or a supernatural mental source. This particular
type of light is that which is associated with the Latin word lucis, a
term that is usually employed to signify light produced by chemical means. (8,
p. 1072). It is to be differentiated from the Christian concept of
"light" which is usually considered the middle English licten.
(8, p. 1046). In what follows, since this illumination comes from Satan and the
company that publishes Bailey's illuminations is the Lucis = Lucifer Publishing
Company, then the term "Light" as it appears in The Great Invocation
is translated as Luciferian enlightenment.
We are told that Bailey's
"Christ" also carries the titles Lord Maitreya, World Teacher, Imam
Mahdi and the Messiah. However, as demonstrated, this term when it corresponds
to a material entity is the Scripturally defined Antichrist. Throughout
Bailey's writings *what she claims to be the unintelligent, the weak ordinary
non-initiated human being is referred to as the little ones or those
with little wills*. These terms, at the very least, refer to *anyone who
follows the strict precepts of Judeo-Christian doctrine*. As previously
detailed, *the Plan is to obtain complete world domination even through
violent means* as utilized by her disciples - The New Group of World Servers.
Of great importance are the terms "Black Lodge,"
"separateness" and the like which, at the least, refer to those that
follow orthodox Judaic or conservative Christian doctrine. If all of the
significant religions are placed in order of Bailey's degree of hatred we would
list them as Judaism, conservative Christianity, some liberal Christianity, and
Islam. Finally, it is obvious that the Bailey term "Love" corresponds
in many respects to the Scripturally described term hate or evil.
Recall that Bailey not only advocates restoring the Plan to the earth by the
Power of spiritual dominance but suggests that the Destruction-Construction
concept is right and proper to employ. Indeed, such violent means as the atomic
bomb are justified in order to rid mankind of any large group or organization
that stands in the way of Bailey's forthcoming kingdom of "God."
With respect to The Great
Invocation, the following are the specific Bailey code word correspondences
that have been identified within this research. The Bailey term or phrase
appears on the left and the corresponding Scriptural (or otherwise identified)
term or phrase appears on the right of the => symbol.
Light, light => Luciferian
enlightenment. Satan.
stream forth => overshadow.
love => various forms of
Scripturally defined evil or, generally, hatred.
Christ => Antichrist.
little wills of men => the
claimed unintelligent, weak and inferior desires of individuals; especially
those that follow conservative Judeo-Christian doctrine.
purpose => to prepare for the
appearance of the Antichrist.
Masters => demons or demon
controlled individuals.
race of men =>
"humanity," as ruled by Lucifer.
plan => complete world domination
in preparation for and after the appearance of the Antichrist.
seal the door where evil dwells
=> violent, if necessary, eradication of those that follow Judaism,
conservative Christianity, some liberal Christianity, and other similar
orthodox religions.
power => often hideous and actual
destructive forces.
It is an interesting exercise to
re-write The Great Invocation with the true meanings of the code words
substituted into the appropriate places.
[The material in this article is
research driven and, as such, I will not engage in any discussion as to my
findings.]
10. References
(1) Bailey, Alice A., A Treatise on the seven Rays, Vol. V of the
Rays and the Initiations. (Sixth printing, 1982), Lucis, New York.
(2) Bailey, Alice A., A Treatise on Cosmic Fire, (Twelfth
printing, 1982), Lucis, New York.
(3) Cavendish, Richard (ed.)., Encyclopedia of the Unexplained,
Magic, Occultism and Parapsychology, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1974).
(4) Bailey, Alice A., Initiation Human and Solar, (Fourteenth
printing, 1980), Lucis, New York.
(5) Brown, Colin, Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Vol. 3,
Zondervan, Grand Rapids, (1971).
(6) Bailey, Alice A., The Externalisation of the Hierarchy,
(Seventh printing, 1982), Lucis, New York.
(7) Bailey, Alice A., From Bethlehem to Calvary, The Initiations of
Jesus, Lucis, New York, (1937).
(8) McKechnie, Jean, Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary of
the English Language, Simon and Schuster, New York, (1979).
(9) Reference (5), Vol. 1.
(10) Reference (5), Vol. 2.
(11) Herrmann, Robert A., "The Reasonableness of Metaphysical
Evidence," The Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, March
1982, p. 17 - 23. "Mathematical Philosophy 1981 Status Report 1," The
Annual Meeting of the American Scientific Affiliation, Eastern College, St.
Davids, PA, 23 August 1981. "National Security and Mathematical
Philosophy" - Report for William P. Clark, Presidential Advisor for
National Security Affairs, (1982).
(TMW) The Tibetan Master's Work, Booklet, Lucis Trust, New York,
(1982).
(GI) The Use and Significance of the Great Invocation, Booklet,
Lucis Trust, New York, (1982).
(SH) The Spiritual Hierarchy, Booklet, Lucis Trust, New York,
(1982)
(ROC) The Reappearance of the Christ, Booklet, Lucis Trust, New
York, (1982).
(NGWS) The New Group of World Servers, Booklet, Lucis Trust, New
York, (1982).
(Sham) Shamballa, the center where the Will of God is known,
Folder, Lucis Trust, New York, (1982).
11. Internet Examples
Of course, the main example of an Alice Bailey organization that exists
today and continues her work is Lucis Trust. They are rather ingenious in their
approach and are intermediate in their "overtness."
[Some of the following Internet
sources may no long be active.] For a very overt presentation of the Bailey
theology, consider Benjamin Creme and his Internet site. Indeed,
please read his biography and the recommendations under the "Further
reading" category. This is a prime example of such overtness and is what
allows the covert groups to more easily carry on their efforts.
A covert, but slowly becoming an
overt, manifestation of Bailey's Universal Church and the Kingdom of God on
earth can be found in the present day Promise Keepers movement. An analysis of this
organization that appeared on the Internet, but I can no longer find, shows
that it is a primary present day example of satanic control through
re-interpretation of the Scriptures and overshadowing of "prominent"
individuals. Leaders of this organization us the same techniques as Bailey uses
with respect to the Scriptures to promulgate, in a very clever manner, the
desires of Bailey's satanic control; desires that will lead the way for the
forthcoming Antichrist. A Christian with the usual amount of Scriptural
knowledge will be very impressed by their official published statements. But,
for an individual with an in-depth knowledge of the Bible with its unalterable
fundamental interpretation, this control becomes obvious when one reads or
hears how the leaders of this organization have either re-interpreted or
ignored the Scriptures. The very existence of this large organization is yet
another strong indication that the time of the Antichrist is very near.
All of the *so-called
"psychic" heath and healing practitioners actually follow portions,
if not all, of the Bailey theology*. This, of course, includes those that
follow the teachings of Ambrose and Olga Worrall. At least, one member of the Seekers Church accepts completely the demonic
practices of the Worralls'. I have specific knowledge of the Worrals'
activities, when at the age 15, I was classified by Mrs. Worrall as the most
spiritual sensitive individual she had ever met and she asked me to join her
activities. Fortunately, I recognized her occult astrological beliefs and I
rejected her ideas on scientific grounds. I did not consider my abilities as
occult in nature. Bailey's influence upon some members of this organization
appears to be very covert in character. But, as with all such organizations,
careful analysis of the official writings of some of the members of this
organization reveals the true identity of their spiritual control. Due to the
first stage of occult overshadowing, it is very possible that various members
of this group are not aware of the relation of their beliefs to Bailey's
theology. As an example, see how occult aspects of the Worralls' healing
"ministry" are discussed within the sermon entited "Faith."
[This may have been removed from their website.] As a second example, there are
the Seekers Church: Core Documents. [These also may be difficult to now find on
their website.] Relative to other "Seekers" writings that appear on
the Internet, it is interesting to note what is missing from this organizations
doctrine. [I will further discuss and establish within another exactly why
"psychic" healing practitioners are disciples of the Bailey
theology.] Another occult centered modern theology based upon what is called
"authentic mysticism" is "Creation Spirituality." You will
find a definition of this concept under the title at What is Creation Spirituality?. [This may now be difficult to
find.] This is a key theological concept as stated on the Creation Spirituality Network site. [This URL now appears as
considerably different from what it was.] This doctrine is a blend of
Catholicism, New Age pantheism, and the universal god concept. It uses many of
Bailey's concepts under different code names such as the "Cosmic
Christ," an impersonal type of universal spiritual force. Matthew Fox is
the major contributor to this movement. There is material on the Internet in
reference to his contributions and, maybe, on Website creationspirituality.org.
[Again this site no longer appears as it once did.]
(Original document, 1982; Last
slight revisions 16 MARCH 2001, 23 FEB 2016, 13 AUG. 2019.
(Source: http://www.raherrmann.com/bailey.htm)
OBSERVATION
Robert A. Herrmann is a great
mathematician, but here he made the mistake of not investigating further,
because Alice BaIley is not waiting for the arrival of the Antichrist, Satan,
Evil, or whatever you want to call it.
In reality, she is waiting for the
arrival of "Lord Christ Maitreya, the Teacher of the World" who is a
fictional character invented by Leadbeater to justify his followers that
Krishmnamurti would be the next Messiah, but all that are lies as I show you in
this another article (see link.)
And Alice Bailey, unaware that
Leadbeater was a big charlatan, she also copied that falsehood from him.
No comments:
Post a Comment